Comments on: Independence: lies and economic realities

By: JT Walsh

JT Walsh — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:47:40 +0000

In fact they’re just pigs.

Don’t be put off by lies and half-truths. Liebour will no doubt accuse you of being child-molesters next. There is no depth to the extent of guile, ignominy and slander to which these people will sink. Damian, Dolly, Vain, Pigswill, Eluned etc have already proved that point.

Keep going at them – relentlessly – and these cowards will be driven out of Wales with their tails between their trotters!

By: Steve Thomas

Steve Thomas — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:37:50 +0000

I love Wales, her people, her history, and I want to see her become a free and independent nation. I have therefore decided to ‘come out’ as an anti-semite! I want to make a full public apology for all the damage this attitude of mind has caused to the people of any nation, especially those minorities who have been persecuted and suffered because of being in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Wise up Liebour apologists, cheap rhetorical tricks won’t save you from the wrath of the Tories!

PS: Pigs are lovely animals. Liebour pigs are not.

By: Dai Williams

Dai Williams — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:05:19 +0000

Surely Andrews is called Piggy for the simple reason that is what he is has been called in political circles for some years. It’s common knowledge and didn’t originate on thsi blog. He can’t help the way he looks and people can’t help referring to him as Piggy because of it. If he was indeed Jewish there might (possibly) be an argument that the term was anti-semitic, but as far as I know he’s not. The term could just as easily be considered anti-Islamic for exactly the same reason. However, apparently Andrews and his wife regularly attend a non-confomist chapel in Cardiff – which might provide a bit of a clue as to his religious leanings!

It just shows how pathetically weak and feeble once powerful Liebour has become in Wales in that its simpering apologists have to stoop to the dubious babble of psycho-analysis to try and fight their way out of an ever-tightening corner.

By: Daffy

Daffy — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:39:16 +0000

Dafydd says: “There is no burden of proof upon me relating to the charge of the anti-semitic (concious or subconcious) undertones of this blog, as that is merely my perception”

Ah well, that’s handy.

By: Kairdiff West Kid

Kairdiff West Kid — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:28:09 +0000

Dafydd. OK, since you seem unable to defend the following quotation: “the use of the pig as the chosen animal in this case points to the blogger’s anti-semitism, either concious or subconcious.” which is an accusation of anti-semitism and racism.
I note you haven’t defended it, or proved it, just ignored it. As I say, my objections to you are not political, they are moral. They concern the crass and cynical holllowing out of emotive and deeply serious terminology for personal or rhetorical gain. It is pretty despicable really.

By: Ifan Arswydus

Ifan Arswydus — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:53:08 +0000

I do know that i have responsibilities when it comes to supporting this site and I would like to say something cleaver but dai williams has said it all – PIGGY PIGGY PIGGY!!! OINK OINK OINK!!! sorry i do not like him