Syncretist

 

Peter HainUnbelievable but we are being foisted with both Peter Hain and Glenys Kinnock yet again.

Guido Fawkes was the first political blogger to have a go at Peter Hain and here is his reaction below

Hain is we are told heading back to the Welsh Office.  Is it because of his brilliance?  When Gordon sacked him last time it was for incompetence.
Is it because he is clean when it comes to his expenses and will demonstrate the sincerity of Brown’s plans to clean up politics?  This is the man who failed to declare £100,000 laundered through a think tank / slush fund for his deputy leadership campaign.  Hain, do not forget, was the cabinet minister who argued for the change in the system that allowed ministers to designate their London home as their second home, he “employs” his 80 year-old mother at the taxpayer’s expense to look after his interests, such a shame she never actually visits his office…

Diolch i chi  Gordon Brown.


Share
 

So now those that support Independence, a separate National identity and full Devolution for Wales know just where they stand with respect to published Labour policy. Households throughout Wales will have just received through the letter box an official  Liebour ‘Election Communication’ and it states quite clearly the following:

Welsh Labour believe this is a time for unity not ‘independence’ for Wales. We need to pull together not break away.

Most potential voters will read this at face value. ie. Labour do not support independence for Wales.  The exhortation to ‘pull together’ is a fine sentiment but hardly constitutes a political policy which will influence voters whereas  Independence and Devolution are clearly issues that our readers and Welsh voters will have a view on.

The leaflet goes on to state:

Both Plaid Cymru and the Lib Dems are ineffective in Europe and would leave Wales on the fringes without an effective voice. Labour can deliver for Wales in Europe.

Well, this is a matter of subjective opinion and Cambria Politico and many others have  frequently posted articles about the Labour/Kinnockian performance and legacy in Europe. The answer to this is clear from the record of Wales as an economy under Labour. In spite of huge EU investment (always delayed and tied up in bureaucratic knots) arguably it has gone backwards not forwards like the Irish economy.  It is also reflected in the vast growth of the Public Sector in Wales which now employs an astronomically and unsustainably large proportion (70% +) of the workforce.

Labour claims to be investing in the Future of Wales but it is the Present that needs the investment. ProfliGate, the expenses scandals has made sure that Labour will NOT be a part of the Future of Wales.


Share
 

According to a story in the Western Mail taken up by Miss Wagstaff blog, buried deep in the massed ranks of jobsworthies in the Department for Economy and Trmoleratansport of the Wales Assembly Government exists a whistleblower/mole who is bravely telling all about the WAG’s performance – he lists a series of alleged shortcomings, claiming they illustrate how the Department for Economy and Transport is letting Wales down, and which include:

  • Recent Ministerial refusal to meaningfully engage with the UK Government on stimulating bank lending to Wales’s businesses in favour of WAG lending of public money direct to business;
  • hundreds of millions of pounds of European aid being diverted from the private sector into the continuation of longstanding, re-branded public sector schemes with poor track records;
  • the much-trumpeted Single Investment Fund and WAG’s SME (small and medium enterprises) relationship manager support is only reaching a minuscule number of Welsh businesses;
  • millions of pounds of funding intended for SMEs not being used and handed back;
  • an expensive IT project to develop a customer relationship management system not delivering;
  • major problems with the public transport concessionary fares scheme;
  • ministers’ decision to reject connecting with the highly praised Business Link and Direct Gov websites, helping millions of individuals and businesses elsewhere in the UK, on the grounds that they are “too English” and would make the millions of pounds invested in WAG’s site look embarrassing;
  • expensive staff events continuing at some of Wales’ best hotels regardless of the recession, and
  • the department’s staff having the least faith in senior management, according to staff survey results.

The witch hunt  is on. This will make the Christopher Glamorgan story pale into insignificance.  Cambria Politico is willing to give the WAG space for a point by point rebuttal of all the allegations since there is no way that the ‘mole/whistleblower’ can be right -  can he/she??

Surely the Mole cannot be right that Convergence Funding has been diverted into public sector projects?

Surely the Mole cannot be right that millions of pounds allocated to business support through the Single Investment Fund in a recession is not reaching those for whom it is intended?

Surely the Mole cannot be right that relationship managers are not having meaningful relations with businesses?

Surely the Mole cannot be right that EU funds are being handed back unspent?

Surely the Mole cannot be right that a cock up has been made of  expensive IT projects?

We await the publication of WAGs rebuttal with bated breath or rather we won’t be holding our breath. Can the WAG at least come up with a list of businesses that have been supported in a way that wasn’t available before the recession through the usual channels?

This is a matter of public interest. Publication of case studies, success stories  and examples  would allow the WAG to rebut these (probably Tory initiated) allegations. We would be only too happy to post these success stories. No-one wants stories and rumours about the Welsh economy to be mole-driven. These rats must be driven out into the open and exposed for all to see that, in fact, the WAG  and its dedicated staff in the Department for Economy and Transport is doing ahem … a great job.

Hat tip- Miss Wagstaff

Update: Much vaunted ProACT scheme not applicable to businesses like JCB in Wrexham. JCB said it had examined the scheme and had not applied because the wage subsidies are only paid for employees in training. Prof.Dylan-Jones Evans says that training support has been available under other schemes for years. So what is new?

Share
 

ballotIn the run up to the European and General Elections, Cambria Politico will be publishing occasional articles and opinion pieces about the reasons to vote FOR a particular political party. A great deal has been written about the negative  ‘attack dog’  role of political blogs and, without giving up on our campaigns against corruption and loss of liberty, we want to provide a more balanced positive commentary.

We will be taking each party in turn and finding one good reason to vote for them, starting with NuLiebour oops! Labour. We will also be scoring them against appropriate parameters to put them in a historical and societal context.

Finding a good reason to vote FOR Labour at the present moment is difficult. However, the Labour Party/Movement has an honourable history, has accomplished many fine things, and has produced figures and personalities of international renown and historical significance.  It has a proud and valued record of  social and political achievements.

labourtideBut that was then and this is now. Labour is now psychologically and socialogically an irrelevance. It has washed out on the tide of political thinking. In Monty Python terms, it is a Dead Parrot or on a par with the People’s Front of Judea or is it Judean People’s Front?

So where is the FOR reason to vote for them?

The brilliant  SF author John Brunner, wrote a famous novel  published in 1965 entitled ‘The Squares of the City’ (ISBN 0-345-27739-2). It is a sociological story of urban class warfare and political intrigue, taking place in the fictional South American capital city of Vados. It explores the idea of subliminal messages as political tools, and it is notable for having the structure of the famous 1892 chess game between Wilhelm Steinitz and Mikhail Chigorin. In this story, society is ‘managed’ using city planning techniques. There are no actual villains and heroes it is mainly  an exploration of how people can be controlled using bulldozers, urban planning  and surveillance. The grim and powerful result is a true nightmare foreshadowing present and possible future conditions in Britain.

So how does this relate to a positive vote for Labour? Brunner, Orwell and other writers, like the late J.G.Ballard, tell us that a truly ‘efficient’ and well organised government is the greatest threat to freedom and human liberties of thought. So a vote for  a useless, chaotic, bumbling, directionless government with real identifiable  ‘faces’ attached to it is a vote for liberty and freedom from faceless efficient supra national oppression. Labour is classically inept and disorganised and thus truly worthy of your vote.

Forget the lies, the minor expenses corruption, the broken manifesto committments, Labour is infinitely preferable to a Brunner, Orwellian, Kafka-esque world of super efficient civil service and control by ‘faceless’ bureaucratic elites exemplified by the frightening Kinnockian European ideal.

Political X Factor Scoring

PARAMETER SCORE (out of 10)
Leadership 1
Grassroots Organisation 5
History 9
Corruption 2
X Factor / Charisma 1
Planet Earth Reality 2
Future Potential 0
Policies 8
Personalities 3
Financial Competence 1
Magic 0
Internet Awareness 2
Governmental Competence 4
Media Savvy 5

TIDE OF HISTORY : AGAINST

Selected quotes:

“[This Labour government] is the most mendacious, dishonest, endemically corrupt, power-hungry, incompetent, illiberal f**king shower of shits that has ruled this country…”—Devil’s Kitchen

Times’ David Aaronovitch – similar wavelength?

Share
 

Resignation PetitionIt will be interesting to see if  this official Downing Street petition asking Gordon Brown to resign gets many signatures. Methinks all those addresses and signatories will end up somewhere on  MI5′ s list or a Labour List spamming/smearing campaign. Mind you some online petitions take off like wildfire so you never know your luck.

Image Hat tip: Guido Fawkes

UPDATE: Carry on up the Prime Minister petition

Share
 

draper1We’ve now had a sort of apology from Derek Draper of LabourList blog (see below) so now the people of Wales should get a similar apology from the scurrilous perpetrators of the Aneurin Glyndwr blog for their gross mis-representations of senior Welsh political figures and bringing politics into further disrepute (if that were possible).

Since the beginning of this year we have worked hard to build a Labour supporting presence online. 99.9% of that time was taken up by setting up LabourList and trying to build it into our version of ConservativeHome. I am proud of what we have achieved in those three months. But of course I regret the 0.1% of my time that I spent thinking about how we might set up a separate left wing “gossipy” site. We had been looking at the success of the right across the blogosphere and seen how effective their more scurrilous elements were. To be honest I think we were a bit dazzled by what they get up to.

In these troubled times, we need 100% of our politicians’ time to be devoted to serving the people rather than infighting on the blogosphere. Leave this to the modern versions of Jonathon Swift who do it so much better.

Share
 

Oliver CromwellOliver Cromwell’s famous speech dismissing the Rump Parliament 20 April 1653.

It is high time for me to put an end to your sitting in this place, which you have dishonored by your contempt of all virtue, and defiled by your practice of every vice; ye are a factious crew, and enemies to all good government; ye are a pack of mercenary wretches, and would like Esau sell your country for a mess of pottage, and like Judas betray your God for a few pieces of money.

Is there a single virtue now remaining amongst you?

Is there one vice you do not possess? Ye have no more religion than my horse; gold is your God; which of you have not barter’d your conscience for bribes?

Is there a man amongst you that has the least care for the good of the Commonwealth?

Ye sordid prostitutes have you not defil’d this sacred place, and turn’d the Lord’s temple into a den of thieves, by your immoral principles and wicked practices? Ye are grown intolerably odious to the whole nation; you were deputed here by the people to get grievances redress’d, are yourselves gone!

So! Take away that shining bauble there, and lock up the doors. In the name of God, go!

MP’s and AM’s should take note.  History is repeating itself. No lessons have been learned. Clichés are becoming Truisms.

Hat tip: a commentator on Guido Fawkes.

Share
 

Everyone else has got this so I suppose we should have it too.  Daniel Hannan MEP rips a new arsehole in G.Brown. He makes the same point that Wyn Price (see below) has made about all the money being diverted into the public sector at the expense of business and the taxpayer.

Gordon Brown finds Daniel Hannan's speech amusing.

Gordon Brown finds Daniel Hannan's speech amusing.

Share