IT’S A move that will please petrol-heads and some of their fast-moving Tory friends, writes Clive Betts from the National Assembly press gallery.

Ieuan Wyn Jones, the transport minister and Deputy First Minister, is bringing in new speed limits for roads which are HIGHER than for the same sort of roads in England.

Mr Jones first told us about the impending changes a short while ago.  Some of us wondered at the time where this idea originated; where, for instance, was the preliminary consultation among road-users, which might have led to the idea.

But the publication of the Assembly coalition government’s half-term report – entitled One Wales 24 (because we are talking of 24 months of governmental activity) – gave a chance to raise the issue again.

The reason for placing one’s voice into gear and ask Mr Jones a question was that some English organisations – such as, no doubt, the AA among them – are complaining that the result of changes being introduced by the Department of Transport for England could result in considerable confusion on English roads.

This will be because on any particular road speed limits could change frequently – in accordance, you understand, with the character of the road.

The question which arose in my mind was whether Mr Jones’s statement of some months ago was merely a copycat reaction to what England was doing. This thought was heightened by the apparent absence of any separate Wales-only consultation process.

Well, indeed, there were some elements of copying the English, Mr Jones admitted to Cambria during the cabinet press briefing. The department in London had apparently decided to relax the normally-strict rules on speed limits.

Which means Wales can do the same.

Of course, Scotland has rather more power, and that country is on its way to gain the power fundamentally to change speed limits.  Perhaps they could even copy the Germans and drop them entirely on motorways …

When Mr Jones spoke this week to the press on what what will happen in Wales, he focussed on pressure for lower limits around schools. Nice and liberal – except in the opinion of petrol-heads.

“There are different issues,” in Wales, Mr Jones said. But he let the cat out of the bag when he started talking about the what these “different issues” might be, where they concern main roads.

In England, he said, main roads between towns were usually dual carriageways or motorways.  He didn’t need to tell us that, in Wales, they usually aren’t.

Wales would, from now on, be able to decide on speed limits in such locations. To suit the character of the country.

In Mr Jones’s words, “A lot of Welsh roads are single carriageway, and therefore there is a different relationship, and how you take is forward … “

And what does that mean ?  Does it mean you would be able to drive faster on a Welsh road than on a equivalent road in England ?

The answer from the transport minister was unequivocal – “Yes, we will be able to.”

But Mr Jones refused to say by how much that would reduce his travelling time from his Anglesey constituency to Cardiff Bay.  Of course, usually Mr Jones travels by either train or plane, to he wouldn’t want to emulate a former Plaid candidate in Denbigh who boasted of how quickly he could easily manage his trip to Cardiff – at least half-an-hour faster than I could ever manage in a newspaper office car.

 

THIS MUST be the first document for the 2011 election campaign, writes Clive Betts from the Assembly press gallery.

Perhaps significantly, it was launched by Ieuan Wyn Jones, leader of  Plaid Cymru and Deputy First Minister, rather than by Labour First Minister Rhodri Morgan.

Ieuan of  course hopes that the May 2011 election will see him moving into the big fifth floor office overlooking the Pierhead Building currently occupied by Rhodri.

To be fair, blatant politics seems to find little place in One Wales 24.

In his launch of the document at the weekly press briefing for the Cabinet, Mr Jones did manage to slip in a spot of politics. The document and the period of cabinet policy launches and publicity events its spawns are a sign of “a strong and more confident nation”.

Rhodri could hardly disagree. But the nearest the document approaches pure politics is the phrase that its policies “respect our nation’s proud tradition of fair play for all”. Which could hardly be a Tory policy.

The 10 pages of solid policies amounts to a useful check-list of what the coalition has achieved or is in the process of doing.

Also a useful list of what has NOT been achieved. Such as free parking charges in all hospitals. The wording used is – “reducing the cost where external contracts are in place”.

The Assembly Government press office admitted that in some hospitals charges will continue to be paid until 2018.

Could they continue even later than that ?  Perhaps not surprisingly, the press office didn’t know.  Or where will charges continue beyond the 2011 election….

For some reason, the press office didn’t know.

One Wales 24 also reminds us that some policies have created real controversy.

We are told of the policy to “develop and implement a programme for improved North-South links”.

Huw Lewis, Labour Merthyr, was one of the few to ask  whether that was a Nationalist policy, which was at the expense of East-West links, in particular the Heads of the Valleys dual carriageway. In other words, Plaid wants quicker links to its heartlands in Gwynedd, and as few as possible into England.

As if on cue, within a couple of hours a number of AMs quizzed the First Minister on what was happening to the Heads of the Valleys road. One asked whether the A 470 (the North-South road) would be dualled before the A 465 (Heads of the Valleys) was finished.

Mr Morgan, as usual, gave an interesting tour around the question when he didn’t want to give a real answer. He told of the “optimism bias” which surveyors employ when costing road schemes for acceptance onto governmental programmes.

The result is that the Welsh Assembly Government nowadays build in a factor of no less than 40 per cent to arrive at a more realistic cost.

But one massive question remained unanswered. Mike German, former Liberal Democrat leader, asked whether the original 2020 target for dualling still stood.

Mr Morgan preferred to speak of all the problems involved in planning and delivering a road.

The upshot to those listening is that there’s still a tremendous lot of work ahead.

And that 2020 will never be met.  But Mr Morgan ensured he never mentioned the words.

 

Air IeuanWhen I was working for the London technical press, one weekly journal got quite excited about the launch of the daily air service between Cardiff and the North.

The magazine, aimed at local authority professionals, were extremely surprised about the development.

You can be sure, that wasn’t because they thought it such a grand idea.  More likely it was because their readers – in one of the technical services – were quite amazed that such money was being spent in the light of the existence of roads and railways.

My stories for the magazine predated the coalition government’s decision to spend quite substantially on up grading the rail link, and its decision to prioritise the north-south highway.

Some might say here lies a nationalistic-style prioritisation which runs counter  to the needs of Wales … apart from politicians wanting to reach Cardiff.

Let us remember how important Cardiff is in transport terms. The international baccaleuriate organisation is pulling out, apart from some specialist functions, because the city it too difficult to get to from the rest of the world. Which is another way of saying that almost the only places you can get to from the city’s airport are Spanish holiday resorts.

Although there are big adverts in Cardiff central station from Lufthansa … you’ve got to go to Bristol to find them.

That northern air link is threatening to turn out bad for Plaid. The Penarth Times carries on attack from an intelligent left-wing Labour supporter on the coalition, which focuses on Plaid, and refers to the “heavily subsidised Ieuan Air Link”. Even Plaid people have been known to refer to “Air Ieuan”.

The party replies that it was the previous Labour government which set up the daily flight to Holyhead, not far from the party leader’s home in Llangefni.

They then add that important users of the flight are civil servants who are running Wales. After all, it takes around five hours to reach Holyhead by road from Cardiff, and four hours to Llandudno.

So how much does Ieuan himself use the flight? One way each week he goes by plane (to Cardiff), while the other is by train.

What about Labour AMs?  Unfortunately, that party doesn’t possess any Assembly seats in the north-west. The electors don’t seem to vote for them …

In other words, this flight could turn into an electoral embarrassment.

 

The Assembly – and in particular Ieuan Wyn Jones, transport minister and deputy to Rhodri Morgan – will soon be presented with an opportunity to make a mark which will last  a half-century or more.

Alternatively, the institution, its ministers and its civil servants could bust their chances through short-sightedness, inability to plan, and failure to innovate.

The gossip has been heard around Cardiff Bay for about a month. But this week an  apparently well-founded press leak has gone far to turn this gossip into fact.

The railway line between Swansea and Paddington is to be electrified. Current plans are to make an announcement early in the new year, with the intention of starting work in 2012.

According to the magazine Today’s Railways UK, the work would be done in five years – or even in three.

Now, this will of course be a London scheme, bringing nearer to completion long-term talk of electrifying all the main lines from the English capital.

Which only goes to emphasise the London-centredness from which the rest of Britain suffers.

But once the electric wires reach Cardiff, the situation changes dramatically for Wales. For some years, work was under way under the old South Glamorgan County Council to electrify the suburban railway system around Cardiff.

After the county was converted into two unitary authorities, it seems the professional engineering working on the project was quietly disbanded – at least partly because of the disruption which accompanies any such major organisational changes.

The idea at the time was linked to talk of running trams to Cardiff Bay. To this day, the precise routes which these tramlines would follow are carefully safeguarded by planners.

But a decade or more later, the transport situation  in the South has changed somewhat. At that time, one of the reason for trams was to get rid of the ugly Bute Street railway embankment.

Now, traffic is growing so much on the Valleys railways that all the talk is of expansion. Platforms are being expanded to take six-car trains; the line to Ebbw Vale has reopened; the next plan surely will be the reopening of the Beddau link at Llantrisant.

Cardiff now is rapidly developing a metro system the equal of the best in the British Isles and the equal of those on the Continent.

A metro system is typified by frequent services (preferably every 15 minutes); stations which are close together; good links to bus services (OK, that’s still to happen in a worthwhile way).

Indeed, trains on a metro take the place of buses on our jam-packed roads.

In Rhondda, almost every village has its station (which means, collecting all the fares is a tough job for the guard !). On the Coryton branch, some stations are within walking distance of each other.

All right, the Ebbw Vale line is a failure from the point of view – a number of the stations closed by Dr Beeching have inexcusably failed to reopen.

All that is obviously wrong with the Valleys system is the trains. Most of the coaches have only two axles; the last time two-axle coaches were common on the valleys, it was the 19th century, and the coaches were swiftly relegated to use on colliers’ work trains.

New trains are needed in the Valleys.

Now, it so happens that one of the main reasons for the Paddington electrification is that the high-speed trains (HSTs) have to be replaced.

The question must then be raised as to whether we get heavy-weight electric trains, as used around London, or whether we adopt systems pioneered some years ago in Germany allowing the new trains to double up as trams and enter town centres (as well as Cardiff Bay…).

This will be a big project. It will mean an enormous amount of work be all levels in the Assembly. Fortunately, the minister is a friend of the railways…

And if we are thinking in coalition terms, this would be a true coalition project.  For the person who first spoke of a Cardiff metro was Sue Essex, the Cardiff North Labour AM, and subsequent transport minister.

 

Police turned out in more-than-usual force for the first demonstration of what seems likely to be a long – and perhaps nasty – battle against a new Assembly motorway. They obviously want to ensure that the Campaign Against the Levels Motorway (Calm) takes place in a truly calm atmosphere.

Whether the demonstration outside the Senedd will be a precursor of peaceful demos is perhaps dubious – I suppose it all depends who comes across the border to lend (perhaps unwanted) help.

The particular cause of bad congestion on the M4 around Newport is its reduction of lanes from six to four because of the Maesglas tunnels.

Neil Crumpton, the highly-respected campaigner for Friends of the Earth who has been busy on road issues for so many years, was certainly very “calm” when I came across him outside Ty Hywel, the Assembly’s office block.

He argues that the road is now unaffordable because recent events mean its cost has risen from £300m to £600m. Although he admits the widening of the present motorway and tunnels is a possible alternative, he would rather such money were spend on a series of small alternatives.

One such is the growing network of railways in the south-east. Although there is now no talk of electrification, modern diesel trains (admittedly not in use yet on the lines in question) mean that we can increasingly talk of a close-frequency metro network.

And that network is growing. Earlier this year, the Ebbw Vale branch was reopened. Earlier this month, albeit almost totally unpublicised, the first stage was taken by allocating £2.6m to restart services from Ebbw Vale to Newport by summer 2010.

Mr Crumpton spoke about opening new stations on existing lines around Newport to create far more of an urban operation.

But he didn’t seem to realise that full potential will not be gained from the Newport line until more stations were opened along the route – compared with pre-Beeching days, a number of quite important stations have not been reopened.

 

Getting us the right to have our national flag on our numberplates

The paramount need for “regional” assemblies has been underlined by a move taken by Janet Ryder, Plaid Cymru’s North AM. It has sometimes been said by experts in the ways of governance that Westminster is seriously overloaded with work. Not many of us took that as a serious complaint.

But Mrs Ryder has now overcome the first hurdle to taking an issue about which nothing has happened for seven years out of Westminster’s hands and handing it to Cardiff’s care: the ability to add national flags to car number plates. The present plates came into use in 2001; they consisted of a new numbering system (commencing with ‘C’ in Wales), a specified font for the letters, together with the ability to add the Euro symbol – thus obviating the need to use a GB sticker abroad.

Scots Nationalists quickly realised that there was no legal place for the saltire. London responded to SNP pressure by agreeing to allow use of the dragon, saltire or St George’s cross instead of the EU symbol. The use of soccer club symbols would be banned.

In the years which have passed, a number of Welsh drivers have been successfully prosecuted for carrying the dragon. You see, London has yet to change the regulations to put the 2001 promise into effect. Mrs Ryder got fed up; she decided that Wales should gain the power to change its own plates. She has won the ballot to propose a Legislative Competence Order to the Assembly.

No doubt, she will win. As the DVLA in Swansea told Cambria, “To date the regulations have not been introduced, and are currently under review.” No doubt, next month there will be a short press release stating that the regulations are about to be introduced!

 

The issues surrounding new roads and their planning just never goes away as this latest message to their AMs from objectors to  the A494 widening in Deeside indicates.

The Parliamentary Planning Bill -Proposals for Infrastructure Planning Commission

This week in our Parliament, the government will propose a new “Planning Bill”. It seeks to “fast-track” the planning approval process for infrastructure projects such as highway construction and waste treatment plants by replacing existing processes with an “Infrastructure-Planning Commission”. This legislation, if enacted will at a stroke, remove from any planning process the possibility of a public inquiry conducted by an impartial inspector.

During the government sponsored proposals to widen the A494/A55 roads, the ordinary people of Deeside were aware of your own significant calls for caution in respect of consequences and due consideration of the alternatives. It was informed sentiments like this, expressed with authority and vigour that contributed to the setting up of a formal independent inquiry. Far from recommending “tweaks” here and there, the Inquiry Inspector, concluded with a recommendation that the whole scheme be rejected. Short of planning expedients that might justify a state of martial-law in the UK, I hope you will agree that this process must be seen as a cornerstone of our democratic accountability.

This needs to be kept an eye on. More on this … HERE

Hat Tip: John Butler



 

It seems that there are still significant battles still to be fought before the out of control Welsh Transport Policy juggernaught can be brought to a grinding halt – we publish the latest episode in this titanic battle…

Letter from John Butler to Janet Ryder

Dear Ms Ryder,

Further to our proposed meeting at your constituency office on 29 May, it would be most helpful if, at that time, you could me provide background clarification/updates for discussion in respect of the following issues:

In view of the fact that several highway schemes in the Principality that were initiated under the same ethos that resulted in the total discrediting of the A494 scheme, are still proceeding, there is continued public unease in respect of concerns for health & well-being.

It would be most helpful if you could ascertain from Assembly Minister for Health, Ms Edwina Hart, her stance on “Statutory HIA’s”.
Also, since BMA Wales have now indicated that they are in process of “drafting legislation”, what is the current progress of the process of enactment?

The evidence supplied by Wales Health Impact Support Unit (WHIASU) which was deposited at the A494 public inquiry, high-lighted collusion and non-disclosure, between high-level officials at Transport Wales and Office Of Chief Medical Officer in respect of any consideration of HIA process.

In light of similar schemes involving the same personnel, could you ascertain from the Assembly Ministers for both Transport and Health if officials in the respective ministerial departments have received any reprimand or revision of instructions?

I am most appreciative of your continued interest in these important matters and look forward to a fruitful meeting on 29th.

see here for more on this

Cambria Books

New publication.
New translation of the Physicians of Myddfai by Terry Breverton

Cambria Books

New publication. Entertaining guide to the US Elections by Denis Campbell.
© 2011 CAMBRIA POLITICO Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha