Gary Speed

In my years in London’s Fleet Street I never worked for Rupert Murdoch’s The Sun but had a friend who did and, when he presented his first story to his news editor, he read it and asked him what he thought it was. “Well, basically, it’s shit,” my friend explained.

“I know it’s shit but I want it made shittier,” the news editor exploded.

I often think of this little cameo and the news editor wandering around his newsroom exhorting his reporters to write more shit since it tells us a lot about the way the newspaper operates and the cynicism which drove it to become the biggest-selling in the world.

It was often said that no self-respecting haddock would want to find itself wrapped in The Sun yet I did often drink with its reporters in Fleet Street and found them a companionable bunch, never slow to get to the bar for their rounds and with at least two disgusting stories about everyone. They were little more than second-hand car salesmen really, enjoying good pay and huge fraudulent expenses with private lives that would have put a gang of alleycats to shame.

I did have a few run-ins with The Sun over the years, once over my then friend, the Labour leader, Neil Kinnock, with whom I had shared a house in university. I wrote a piece for The Independent about our college days which, unknown to me, was sold on to The Sun. They took the piece and carefully changed almost every line until it suited the anti-Kinnock line they were promoting at the time. It became a tissue of lies and, perhaps needless to say, Kinnock never spoke to me again.

The best thing you can ever do with any Sun reporter, if he comes poking around your door, is not to say one single word and keep that door firmly shut. Whatever they say, even it’s to tell you the time, is almost bound to be a lie.

Occasionally I am called to take part in a lunchtime discussion on BBC Radio Wales, usually when it’s something to do with the media. Recently I found myself on a panel with the London online editor of The Sun. When asked why his newspaper kept hounding celebrities about their sex lives he said they did so as a service to society, that the paper made them into better and more responsible people.

The show’s presenter Jason Mohammed asked me what I thought of that reply and, practically foaming at the mouth, I shouted, “Well there are only two words to describe that and they are ‘Complete bollocks’.”

I couldn’t then finish what I wanted to say because Jason cranked up his apology machine and drowned out all my other words saying how sorry he was about all this bad language. Even the online editor of The Sun started complaining about me using such language in front of him.

Well that’s the end of my career as a BBC pundit, I thought rather happily because it’s an occasional job I’ve worked hard to kill off for years. But minutes later a businessman got on the line and, before Jason could bleep him, shouted: “Tom Davies was absolutely right. What that man from The Sun said was complete bollocks.” Jason moaned and groaned and started cranking up his apology machine all over again.

An unusual thing happened to me the other day since I kept crying copiously during a football match. I know I’m in the absolute prime of my decrepitude but there was Newcastle playing Chelsea – neither of which I am particularly fond of – and I was sitting there blubbering like a baby because the fans kept chanting: “There’s only one Gary Speed.” 

There is a lot of talk on Twitter and elsewhere that Gary Speed was gay and that he committed suicide because The Sun was pursuing him about some affair he was alleged to have been having. I don’t know if there is any truth in this but I do know that who a man wants to sleep with is entirely his own business, no matter what the online editor of The Sun might tell you.

But if The Sun was actually hounding this lovely, beautiful footballer to a premature grave, for whatever reason, then I can promise you that, if it does get out, all hell will break loose and every decent minded person in the land will rise up and march on the offices of this shitbag newspaper and destroy the dump with the flame and flood of their purest anger.

This paper has become the very cornerstone of a great dynasty of evil which is now ruling the minds and thoughts of almost everyone in this blighted world. With its routine lies, degradation of women on Page Three and merciless hounding of people merely because their faces appear on television, this newspaper is rotten to the core and all it truly deserves is to be consigned to an early and dishonourable grave.

gan Tom Davies – see my facebook page for more articles

Share
 

We are pleased to welcome the author and ex-journalist Tom Davies as a contributor to Cambria Politico.

Tom DaviesYet another mad dog of the video age, Anders Behring Breivik, was hauled up into the public dock in Oslo for the first time this week and I can’t quite decide who I despise the most: this wretch who took 77 lives or the world’s media gathered there recording his every word and look.

When you look at Breivik’s life you see a man who planned his attack meticulously over years and one who was plainly relying on the publicity generated by his attack to give him a world platform for his ideas. And didn’t it work like a dream! “Gruesome but necessary,” he said of what he had done.

The last thing he did before his attack was to send out e-mails listing his ideas and, within hours of that attack, all these dopey ideas on such as political correctness and Islam were being run at nose-bleeding length even by so-called respectable papers like The Observer. They’re still examining his ideas in column after column in papers everywhere as if they have some intrinsic worth just because he mercilessly gunned down all those poor kids.

This tragedy takes us right to the heart of modern terrorism: the filthy relationship which has grown up between terrorism and the media. They have both become the truly fatal lovers of our lost and falling world: the media with its addiction to all forms of violence and the terrorist with his ruthless and even intelligent exploitation of that addiction. It is all beyond the wildest fantasies of Shakespeare. Both sides hate one another and yet are locked in a lethal, sado-masochistic embrace which they cannot get out of and, in so doing, are both dragging the world spiralling down into their stained and incestuous beds.

If you have a cause to promote forget about stupid words and get yourself a bomb or a gun. Give me a celebrity murder, preferably of a sexual nature, and I’ll reward you with eternal fame.

The media will shout and scream about these charges. They almost always do. But maybe that’s as it should be. The greater the truth, the greater the rage.

gan Tom Davies – follow me on facebook

Share
 
scotmap

The new Conservative bill on elections passed last year reduces the number of seats overall from 650 to 600.  The breakdown is as follows:

Nation                        Old  seats                                     New seats

England                         533                                                 502

Scotland                         59                                                    52

Wales                              40                                                   30

N. Ireland                     18                                                   16

Total                              650                                               600

I have estimated the effect on the parties if the last (2010) election had had the new boundaries, by simply assigning the percentages of the 2010 vote according to the way the 2010 constituency was split up:

Scotland:  Old                                                New (estd.)

C 1, Lab 41, LD 11, SNP 6                 C 0, Lab 38, LD 8, SNP 6

England:   Old                                                New (estd.)

C 298, Lab 191, LD 43, G 1              C 291, Lab 183, LD 28, G 0

N. Ireland:   Old                                            New

Nationalist 18                                       Nationalist 16

Wales:     Old                                                   New

C 8, Lab 26, LD 3, PC3                      Available Jan. 2012 (see also my article ”The Taffymander” in Cambria).

The most interesting case is Scotland, where the SNP are the only part not to lose.  This recalls my findings in the article “The Taffymander” that would lose less in the new seat distribution for Wales than any other party.  I showed that this was due to the geographical distribution of the Welsh language, which is strong in “promontory”-type constituencies, and also in the neighbouring “mainland” regions.  When seat numbers are reduced, promontory seats have to be expanded, and this can only be done in the direction of the neighbouring mainland, which only brings in more Welsh-language (i.e. Plaid) votes.  The “promontories” involved in Wales are Ynys Mon, the Llyn, and Penfro (which can only expand into Welsh-specaking Arfon. Gwynedd, Ceredigion and Carmarthen).

It looks like the same is true in Scotland, where the “promontory” involved is Aberdeenshire (ignoring the Western Isles, which are given special treatment in the new law).  Since they cannot expand into the North Sea, as the number of seats decreases, the promontory seats expand into a broad arc from Moray Firth to the Tay which is rich in SNP voters, and so the SNP do not lose.

But this leaves one big question unanswered – why are SNP voters so heavily concentrated in the north-east of the country?  In the case of Plaid’s promontory seats, it is because of an underlying social variable – the Welsh-speaking vote.  But what is the social variable underlying the SNP vote in North-East Scotland?  Not language (Gaelic), nor religion (“Wee Free” Presbytreianism, by analogy with Welsh Nonconformity).  Does anybody have any suggestions as to why this sector of Scotland is so strongly Nationalist?  I’d like to hear from you.

Share
 

The University of Wales has just had a clean bill of health and confidence report from the QAA. Colleges across the country would like these results, so why are they being hounded?

Our information is that Leighton Andrews has never met with the University of Wales, why not?

Why is the BBC gunning for the University of Wales?

The University of Wales is only doing what all other educational establishments across the country are doing.  It was set up under the watch of other universities who are now ‘rubbing their hands with glee’ as they watch the fallout, why?

Share
 

S4C What of it’s future?

 

gan Eifion Lewis

Touring a show they had devised themselves about S4C’s on-going crisis my students had quite a shock. The drama – 4 waleS/C england – was the product of intensive discussions they organised on behalf of a channel that they infrequently watch. Indeed, they infrequently watch any television channel. Facebook and other social media applications have generally taken the place of television with regard to this age group. The response of audiences in the village halls and chapel vestries of our Welsh speaking communities was quite a shock to them. Audiences presented them with a depth of feeling and concern about the potential fate of S4C that they were just not prepared for.
At the beginning of this year I took part in an open discussion in my own community about the channel’s crisis. Two emotions were prevalent: anger and anxiety. The anger emanated from the UK coalition government’s high-handed treatment of our one and only Welsh medium channel. The anxiety was focussed on its future. Does S4C have one?
It’s a good question and one that has almost as many answers as there are interested parties. Some media analysts are concerned that the contractual arrangements between S4C and the small group of largely Cardiff based companies that supply the bulk of its output will make it very difficult for the channel to manage the severe budget cuts that the government has enforced.
Although they are too wary to say it out aloud what they infer is simple: S4C does not have a sustainable future. Not, that is, in its present form. Their worst day scenario is a complete – call-in-the-receivers style -shutdown.
Their best guess is that a much smaller and very much less active S4C will be rescued from the ashes. Less active would mean a return to limited hours broadcasting – from 6.00pm until 10.00pm nightly, for example. Such a reduced schedule would mean the end of S4C’s substantial children’s output – an output that is widely acclaimed not only for its high production standards but also for its tangible contribution towards delivering a bilingual Wales. Such a reduction would also raise questions about S4C’s presence at our main communal happenings which include the Royal Welsh Agricultural Show as well as the Urdd and the National Eisteddfodau. Whereas television coverage tends to have an adverse effect on sporting events Wales’ principal cultural festivals have doubtlessly enhanced their appeal and effectiveness since the advent of S4C and its comprehensive coverage.
Ned Thomas, a veteran of the battle to establish a Welsh channel and an academic with wide experience of international media, has commented that whilst many European broadcasters are heavily dependent on the dubbing of American drama and films to fill their schedules S4C, from the start, has managed to provide us with television that is home-produced through and through. But whilst the harbingers of doom warn us that such a service cannot be taken for granted in the future other, more radical voices say that cutting S4C’s working budget does not necessarily mean a less virile service.
Indeed, they argue to the contrary. A slimmer S4C could be more invigorative and much more exciting. Such an argument is based on a presumption that the channel’s guiding figures will translate the funding crisis into an opportunity to re-imagine its role and re-define its raison d’etre to take account of the very different current context of television as a national media and its relationship with the whole issue of the Welsh language in comparison to the days of its inception, almost 40 years ago. In 1982, the Welsh fourth channel was allowed to join BBC 1, BBC 2 and HTV’s collective monopoly of home  entertainment. Within the last 10 years the advent of multi-channel digital television followed by the social networking revolution has consigned that situation well and truly to history.
Similarly, the day-to-day status of the Welsh language has changed considerably over the same period of time.
Forty odd years ago hardly any one of the many professional agencies that now plan and promote the language at national, regional and local level existed. Most importantly of all, there was no Welsh Assembly Government to take political responsibility for the language and to instigate progressive initiatives across the boundaries of all devolved matters.
The students who wrote and performed 4 waleS/C england are from a variety of linguistic backgrounds. They would not have gathered together on a Welshmedium university course were it not for the bilingual educational provision whose widespread blossoming is indicative of the changes Wales has undergone since S4C was first launched. Language commentators attribute much of the success of the bilingual schools movement to the change in attitude towards the Welsh language effected by S4C’s early success. From being the language of all our yesterdays it became the lingua franca of a confident and ambitious young and creative energy.
Doomsday could still happen – not least if S4C is to become merely an esoteric department within the BBC’s vast and hierarchical empire. Surely the radicals’ approach is the only possible way of ensuring a meaningful future for the channel. Such an approach would engender the development of a broadcasting strategy that is based on the multi-channel and multi-platform reality of the moment. Such an approach would ensure that S4C, and its world-wide potential, is seen as an essential component within the burgeoning framework of a bilingual nation. In Welsh, ‘language’ opinionis idiomatically partnered by ‘culture’ (iaith a diwylliant). The radical re-imagining of S4C would re-establish the symbiotic link between the language and distinctive culture of Wales. Such a step could be very far reaching. It could even provide us with the power of self-belief.
It was understanding the battle fought by a determined few that enthused my students to create a drama out of S4C’s crisis.

Eifion Lewis

Eifion Lewis is a proud product of the Rhondda Valley. However, it is the rural communities of the west that have provided him with a base of creativity and energy with which to question both the fragility and resilience of Welsh culture. During his time as Lecturer in Charge of Theatr Felin-fach he instigated radical projects that
sought to develop a creative dialogue between cultures. Subsequently he established Cwmni Cydweithredol Troedyrhiw – a co-operative company that produced, in 2010, a whole year of multi-media work dedicated to the re-telling of how the community of Epynt was lost, 70 years previously. In May, 2010 he was appointed Performance and Script-writing Fellow at University of Wales, Trinity St David’s. He has one son, Rhodri, and his wife, Eleri, is part of Tinopolis’ Wedi 3 production team in Llanelli.

Share
 
“As you are probably aware The Welsh Assembly Elections are being held in May. “
(ed. errmmmm … yes)

Have you given any thought as to which candidate would be best for your business ?

Carmarthenshire and Pembrokeshire Branches of the FSB Branch are organising an “Election Hustings”. This will take place on Tuesday the 19th April, 7:30pm at Llanteglos Confernence Centre, Llanteg. SA67 8PU.

We have received confirmation that representatives of the major parties have accepted the invitation to attend. These will be:

Selwyn Runnett, Liberal Democratic Party.
Nerys Evans, Plaid Cymru.
Angela Burns, Conservative.
Christene Gwyther, Labour.

This is a wonderful opportunity to question the politicians on a range of business related issues, ie Business Rates, Bank Support, Welsh Assembly Support for Business, Planning, Procurement etc. and whichever candidate  is successful can be reminded of promises made at this meeting!

Using the same format as proved successful in the past, please forward your questions to  the Hustings Chairman Donald Melrose, donaldmelrose@actioncoach.com he will put these to the panel, there will also be an opportunity to ask questions “from the floor”.

Share
 

Rhobert ap SteffanIn memoriam.

Rhobert ap Steffan was a founder member of the St.David’s Day Parade in Cardiff. Sadly, he passed away last month but we are sure that he will be marching along with us in spirit. We all miss him especially today.

Wherever you are Rhobert – Cymru am byth!

For the rest of us I hope you enjoy the day and please support your local festivities wherever they may be.

Share
 

Now #WikiLeeks, Wales’s own whistleblower website, targets Assembly politicians with astonishing revelations!

Truly shocking revelations from secret files intercepted by #WikiLeeks sympathisers mean that Welsh politics will never be the same again!

WikiLeeks

Share

Cambria Books

New publication. Important contribution to our knowledge of the Arab Spring by Denis Campbell.
© 2011 CAMBRIA POLITICO Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha