Power Generating Windmills

BBC TV Wales and other broadcasters recently trumpeted that a new report showed that more wind-powered generators [known as wind turbines to the marketing men and scientifically backward] would bring more jobs and income into Wales. These wind-powered generators only produce power intermittently, and the latest models, 425 feet high, can be seen from 30 miles away. They need access roads, power from conventional sources, sub-stations and pylons to connect and balance with any electricity grid, and form wind power stations, not wind farms otherwise we would have coal farms, nuclear farms, gas farms and the like.

Wales is by far one of the poorest regions of the EU, and already has five times the density of wind-generated intermittent power generators as its larger neighbour England. It may be that the wind stops at Offa’s Dyke, because English pressure groups have succeeded in preventing their spread across that country. However, in Cymru it is different. Plaid Cymru has become known as Plaid Gwynt, the Party of Wind, which applies to its speeches as well as its backing for wind energy. Labour controls Wales under Arglwydd Carwyn of Millbank, and is itself, as always, controlled by Labour HQ in London, which is pro-wind energy. Its leader, the Croatian-Polish parented Ed Miliband, tells us that it is ‘morally inexcusable’ to oppose wind energy.

Wales has a population of just 3 million, and its only viable industry is tourism which is being wrecked by these wind follies, along with the lives of those who live near them. World population is growing by 3 million a week (i.e. the population of Wales!), and a new and dirty coal-fired power station is also coming on-line every single week across the world. For Wales to be littered with even more inefficient, ineffective wind follies is pointless, when we consider the global picture. Forget the mantra of man-made global warming – climate has always been changing, owing primarily to Milankovic Wobbles, as I outlined in my book Breverton’s Encyclopaedia of Inventions. The Romans had vineyards in Wales and there was not then a fuss about carbon emissions. They held fairs on the frozen Thames in the seventeenth century. A few years back, scientists told us that we would fry because of the gap in the ozone layer, while others said we were heading for a new Ice Age. Forget the cynical manipulation of facts and the fact that scientists now say what their paymasters wish them to say.

The point is, that whatever Wales does, it cannot affect anything upon an international scale. It is a tiny country, thirty miles across its waist, with hardly any industry or carbon emissions, smaller than New Jersey. It would be the 48th largest US state, just ahead of Delaware, Connecticut, Rhode Island and Washington DC. The land area of the USA is 375 times that of Wales, and its population over 100 times as much. The Wales Assembly Government wishes to ‘lead the world’ in green policies, rather than develop an economically viable future for the country. Welsh government planning guidance sets an absurd goal to generate 2,000 megawatts of electricity from onshore wind turbines by 2025, with most of it available by 2020.

However, Wales only uses 2000MW of electrical energy in total each year. Wales already produces over 6000MW of such energy, with 2/3 of it going via huge pylons to England. More conventional power stations are planned, which might effectively provide Wales with over five times the power it requires, nearly all going to England.

Wales is obviously far more than self-sufficient in energy, and if its government wishes to rely totally upon renewable energy, then the country will grind to a halt when the wind speed is too high or low. Not one of its conventional sources of energy can be closed down as they will be supplying England, and also Wales when the wind follies do not spin – so where is the green energy dividend in building more wind follies?

Carwyn Jones, First Minister of Wales, was the person responsible for surreptitiously signing off the infamous Technical Advice Note 8 (TAN8). This effectively gave Forestry Commission land (which belongs to the Welsh people and covers large tracts of the most beautiful parts of Wales) over to wind power station developers. People’s protests are over-run by planning inspectors to fulfil the pledge to green energy, and peat bogs, archaeological remains and spectacular vistas are being ruined. If the Welsh Government is to reach its target, it could have fifty times the density of wind energy generators of England, and one will be able to see and hear a wind folly from any hill in the country. It is madness of the first order when politicians will not admit that they are wrong.

The Welsh Energy Minister is a former solicitor John Griffiths, who has loudly trumpeted the value of this ‘independent’ piece of research, showing that Wales will get 2,000 more jobs and a huge income from meeting its green energy target. This Cardiff Business School-Regeneris report upon renewable energy was sponsored by the Wales Assembly Government and Renewables UK, and therefore has no assessment of cost-benefit analysis, being merely a wish list of the propaganda that its sponsors wish to promulgate. It served its purpose – all media in Wales duly reported that more wind follies are good for the country. Deeply flawed, it is abysmal that a university research department has colluded in its publication. Cardiff University should immediately either repudiate it, or admit that it was paid for and virtually worthless.

I live near a wind power station, Alltwalis, and there have been NO jobs created there. Someone might come along now and again and pick up the chopped up birds and bats, but usually foxes and buzzards do that for them. There are more poposed all over Wales, including on the battlefield of Hyddgen, where Glyndwr’s War of Independence flared into life. Each wind generator requires a 1000 ton slab of concrete, which will cause flooding problems, and the machines themselves are not recyclable. We know that when the massive operating grants are due to end, they will be sold to shadow companies which quickly go into liquidation and will not be able to restore the land. The wind generators themselves will be left to rot in the landscape like the gibbets of old. Wales will be defaced forever.

The report’s only sponsors are the following, ALL windpower renewable companies and mainly foreign-owned:
1. Amegni Renewables is owned by a family of local landowners from Carno, near Llandinam. They allowed Carno 1 & 2 wind power stations to be built on their land (on one of the largest blanket bogs in Wales and cutting through a Roman road). The son built the 3rd windfarm extending the Carno disgrace towards Llanbrynmair, with 12 Wind energy generators reputedly raking in £3million a year. He has another application pending. The village of Carno, despite all this community benefit and income going to a few of the indigenous locals has lost its main employer, and the school is under threat of closure;
2. Pennant Walters is a renewable energy company based in Hirwaun which has built up a landbank of 25,000 acres across Wales to develop windfarms;
3. Renewables UK Cymru is part of the pro-wind lobbying body Renewables UK, representing all the UK and foreign companies involved;
4. RES is an international renewables company;
5. RWE npower renewables;
6. Scottish Power renewables;
7. Tegni Cymru Cyf – a German-Welsh wind power developer;
8. Vattenfall – one of the biggest wind power developers, hit by scandal in the past;
9. Welsh Government – demonically in favour of renewables; and
10. West Coast Energy – wind power developer.

It is almost impossible to get anything published critical of Welsh problems in Welsh media, as they need advertising incomes from councils and government. Carmarthenshire County Council recently withdrew advertising from the South Wales Guardian after some criticism, almost forcing it to close. My new book The Welsh: The Biography criticised the current situation in Wales, but could not be published by Welsh publishers for fear of losing their grants, and similarly has not been reviewed by Welsh newspapers and magazines except possibly for Cambria, Yr Enfys and Golwg. The editor at its English publisher wondered by Welsh people put up with poor government and said that Welsh, i.e. British, history should be taught in English schools. I replied that it is not even taught in Welsh schools.

Is it surprising that the report is in favour of more wind energy? Is it independent? Is it a rigorous piece of research? Does it have any use at all, except to scientifically illiterate politicians trying to justify a scandalous waste of public funds? Why does it take a 66-year-old former businessman to criticise its bias and the non-existent economic policies of Wales, rather than the media, politicans and academics? As a former management consultant, I would have resigned rather than have submitted such a biased piece of research.

gan Terry Breverton

 
The Welsh Koala

Insults Require Counter-offensives

Gan Alan Sandry.

Michael Buerk’s Christmas missive regarding the contribution made by Welsh people through their singing voices is the droll iceberg of Metropolitan resentment about Wales’ existence.

Michael Buerk in The Mail on Sunday “Wales is not another country; it’s England with an accent and a good singing voice. But it is being pulled along by Scotland in devolution’s slipstream, whether it likes it or – more probably – not.”

In his Mail on Sunday outburst – it could only be that rag, naturally, which specialises in cultivating and encouraging the xenophobic angst of, seemingly, rational and cultured public figures – Buerk despaired at the “state of Britain”. Ironically, someone really ought to have taken him to one side and told him that this is hardly innovative thinking, as the big ‘S’ “State of Britain” has perplexed many of us for decades . It would possibly have been more pertinent if Buerk, and similar mollycoddled and indulged members of the London commentariat, actually looked at the condition of themselves and their prejudices. Indeed, for several years now, Buerk has come across as the apotheosis of smug colonialism, personified by the coterie of BBC broadcasters who observe Wales as an oddity; the dog with no hair, who engenders concurrent feelings of pity and loathing. Does this matter? Well it all ultimately depends on how people in our country wish to deal with the stream of ignorant invective from Buerk and his fellow travellers, and whether they decide to act through countering these perceptions with positive action. That, however, would involve affirmative responses, and not just the shoulder shrugging that we appear to have mastered in recent times.
All of this came at the end of 2012, a year that could be described as either an annus horribilis or an annus mirabilis, depending on your ideology and outlook. Leaving aside Olympic and Royal hyperbole, the back end of 2012 saw the issuing of the 2011 Census results. However they are read, these produce some sober statistics, with, arguably, stark implications.
The results provide us with data that enable us to visualise, understand and interpret the clear sociological and cultural de-boning of Wales, in terms of how many of us have attempted to understand our nation through historical representation. For sure, facts, data, and political spin will come and go and, inevitably, a ‘New Wales’ will, in some shape or form, arise: all societies evolve after all.
Nevertheless, with the conspicuous increase in in-migration from England and the political manoeuvring to Anglicise Cardiff and its environs, and amalgamate all points east of Bridgend with a Greater Bristol ‘super-region’, it would appear that rather than a distinctive, identifiably ‘Welsh’, Wales shining through, it may be little more than a watered down Wiltshire that we are eventually left with. Mr Buerk may, indeed, have a point! However, even these changes, dramatic though they undoubtedly are, may well prove to be transient and rapidly reconfigured. By the time of the next Census – 2021 – there is a strong possibility that the UK will not exist.

Should the people of Scotland accept collective responsibility, and vote ‘Yes’ to independence, then RumpUK will be hiccupping its way into the world. In addition, by 2021, the north of Ireland may be on the verge of departing this Rump, as demographic shifts in favour of the Catholic population, and the advancement of Realpolitik, will almost certainly see the staging of a Re-Unification Referendum. Whatever the outcome, Ulster will inevitably be one or two steps nearer Dublin and a couple of
strides further away from London.
The current row regarding the flying of the Union Flag is just the start of the debate on what some observers are labelling “an Irish future?” Taken as a whole, the implications for us are enormous. Wales, and this is the part that terrifies both political and civil society alike, will be forced to consider distinct choices.
Devolution, by that stage in the constitutional process, will be a busted flush. Moreover, Federalism – the halfway house preference, favoured by some urbane politicos – will not be an option. Despite its recent converts from the ranks of ‘soft’ Plaid and ‘inclusive’ Conservatives, with a smattering of Labour  progressives’ to add an air of radical, evolutionary consensus, Federalism ceased to be a viable alternative framework on 3rd May 2007, when the SNP emerged as the largest party within the Scottish Parliament. Since then, and despite their no doubt honest intent, the advocates of Federalism have promulgated an implausible solution.
So, the choice – the division – may be between independence or absorption? Nevertheless, a question rarely asked is this: is it now too late for Wales to consider independence? Whilst the cautious, sentinel voices of British statism warn us that it is far too early to consider anything remotely akin to autonomy, the converse analysis would note that Wales is ‘too far gone’ down the path of England Wales-ism (the Elizabethan State) to ever release itself and claim national political freedom and nation-state classification. One standard obstacle placed in the way of political autonomy, by British nationalists from both the left and the right, is the economy, and its perennially parlous state. Whilst it would be foolhardy to dismiss economic concerns, the notion of self-government, and freedom from extraneous influences, is a completely separate argument of positioning and empowerment. The fact that the Welsh economy – today, just as much as it was in the past – provides a testing ground for those seeking mineral exploitation, labour-force exploitation, and land exploitation is not an argument against independence. Quite the reverse! It provides an unambiguous argument in favour of self-government.

But we also require other forms of renaissance across our communities, both urban and rural. Once established, these linkages between town and country then require bold creations and radical exploration to re-invigorate our society. Some examples already exist. Unitary Urbanism, for example, which was supported by some of the Situationists amongst others, argued for perennial exploration and  experimentation in urban life. Compare this with the scenario in today’s Wales – in today’s
Cardiff Bay, to use its synecdoche – which is static and constricting. Since 1999 an initial sense of progression has been gradually reduced to a state of virtual stagnation. Politicians, political parties, lobbyists, the media, and great swathes of civic society have all played their various parts in stifling any emergence of a buoyant culture: cliché or not, the crushing jackboot of ‘Old Boyism’ truly is alive and well. Disgracefully, we have settled for bland, with a distinct lack of space for elasticity. In amongst all of this, our pinnacle of hope, the National Assembly, has become a ludibrium. It has the power to shape and influence lives but it has become the plaything of a tightly knit oligarchy – the Bay-istas – who oversee and control political, social, cultural and economic interactions (most prominently in Cardiff and the Labour fortresses of the south). The madcap scheme for City-Regions, so beloved by the Bay-istas, will only mushroom this hegemony. In terms of authentic economic and social progress these City-Regions will have scant effect.
In terms of dominance by the social democratic bourgeoisie, and their progeny, the careerist crachach, they will prove invaluable. Furthermore, national integration, disguised as regional overlapping, appears to be the latest project to promote assimilation.
Exemplified by Hain’s Folly – the Severn Barrage – there is a persistent neo-liberal push for locking in the economies and societies of our south eastern corner with the western counties of England. Whilst these developments are perfect for “here today, gone tomorrow” entrepreneurs and speculators, they are disastrous for those who genuinely believe in a verifiable ‘national interest’. Wales is stagnating, but so many people in positions of power and influence seem content for this to occur as they maintain their dominion through disseminating the false promises of “tens of thousands” of (chimerical) jobs on the horizon. Sadly, we have allowed a situation to develop where the cruellest of all cons – the hope of a job with security – is shamelessly played on the unemployed with alarming regularity. Political and economic leadership – of both political parties and broader society – is culpable in this. At the precise moment that we desperately require bold leadership and vision for our nation, far too much time is being wasted on fanciful projects, which provide little real hope.

Unless people are not revealing their true selves, then the statement has to be made that Wales lacks leaders who are truly desirous of significant change. Flipping in the Assembly may be politically meaningful but in terms of societal earthquakes – paradigm shifts – it is marginal. With this in mind, it was interesting to note the commemorations of 30 years of S4C, and Gwynfor Evans contribution in forcing the hand of Thatcher’s Government to ensure that company’s establishment. Gwynfor mastered ‘gamble politics’ with his threat of hunger striking. Fascinatingly, but regrettably, this was the last of the great gestures – the grand positioning – of political figures in Wales. Whilst grassroot members of Cymdeithas Yr Iaith have consistently championed non-violent-direct action, and its consequences, few ‘household names’ have followed suit by attempting praxis outside of the political institutions. If our country is to move on, to progress, to foster a climate of rejuvenation, then more prominent people have to stand up and be counted. The reality remains, alas, that the National Assembly has manufactured Koala Bear politicians: generally assuring but hardly intrepid.

But is this what our nation needs?

The ‘koala effect’ has also filtered into business and commercial circles, with even our protest groups protesting less than they were a decade ago. Last September 1.5 million people were on the streets of Barcelona voicing their demands for independence from the Spanish State. Can Cardiff offer up a tenth of that number (150,000) to demonstrate for political freedom? It can, but to kick-start the process the leaders of Wales have to lead. We have to change the mise-en-scene of Welsh politics and society. It is time for the Koalas to awake from their slumber.

Published in February 2013 issue of Cambria Magazine

Dr Alan Sandry writes and broadcasts
on Welsh and European Politics.

 
maddog

The Welsh are among the dwindling company of acceptable targets for gratuitous public contempt and abuse. Hatred against other identifiable groups of people continues as before, but many bigots now feel a certain embarrassment at ranting in public. They will usually feel comfortable enough at perpetrating such abuse amongst their own kind, and can become very indignant when this is reported. What, though, is the best way of dealing with the kind of ravings we still read against Welsh people and their language, their culture, and their way of life.

A cove I knew who worked on a paper explained that, from the editorial viewpoint, there is often nothing personal in such attacks. Any group of people would do as a target. What matters is that the vilifying pieces attract a lot of attention and elicit a furious response. This boosts the circulation, and thereby enhances advertising revenue.

He went on to assert – and I only have his word for it – that an indirect approach can discourage this kind of calumnious behaviour. The first step is to buy a single copy of the issue of the periodical in question wherein the offending piece was published. The second step is to create a ream or so of facsimiles, either through photocopying or through scanning. They need not be full-sized, or, indeed, particularly legible. All that matters is that they be identifiable. The third step – and I have never tried this myself, nor do I urge you to try it – is to post them to the editor of the periodical in cheap, unstamped envelopes.

This, it is alleged, will indicate the depth of public displeasure at the publication of gratuitous calumnies. For my part, I prefer studiously to ignore them. If the perpetrators fail to elicit the angry response they desire, this will ruin their day for them.

 
A Straight Flush

As predicted in my first post on the US presidential election poker game, Barack Obama duly moved smoothly into the second game of the three ‘presidential’ debates. This time he was in an aggressive mode causing his opponent to be flustered and to fold at the death in the last few seconds. This enabled Obama to hit Mr.Romney with the 47% ‘zinger’ with no chance to reply. Brilliant! What a player!

So what will be in Obama’s hand in the third and final debate? I predict it will be a fistful of zingers. These cards will be a straight flush of:

The Sensata China Syndrome (outsourcing)
The 47% moochers (again)
The Bain effect
The Income tax question
The War on Women

This is a very good hand and it is difficult to see Mr.Romney getting back at this without totally losing his cool. Looking forward to it!

For those of you interested in following the US elections, I heartily recommend Denis Campbell’s blog at UKProgressive .

 

 

When I took “A levels” as a student at a fine grammar school, Howardian High School in Cardiff, the WJEC exams were considered very challenging and among the toughest offered by any of the exam boards. Indeed in the autumn of 1961, before we sat WJEC “A levels”, we were encouraged to sit the “A Level” exams set by London University Boards as practice. The consensus amongst us sixth formers was that the London Board exams were rather easier but good practice nonetheless. I then attended that wonderful federal institution, the University of Wales and went to Aberystwyth. Proudly displayed on my office wall is a certificate from “Universitas Cambrensis” with the details of my honours degree in science. Sadly the original federal university is no more and all of the prime constituent colleges are now individual universities. I then went on to study at the University of California, Berkeley, another federal university system and one of the very finest in the World. Nobody in California saw fit to destroy that federal arrangement. Instead they have honed and polished the University until it sits at the very pinnacle of the World’s universities.

So here we are in 2012 and it is a doleful scene to contemplate. Howardian High School, a great educational institution, was swept away in the 1970’s along with other fine schools in Cardiff and around Wales. The University of Wales, such as remains, is embroiled in scandal and its woeful mismanagement and endorsement of suspect colleges around the World have completely ruined the name of what was once a fine university system that also carries the name of our country. More recently the actions of the WJEC have dragged what was once considered one of the best exam boards in Britain, deep into the mire of ridicule.

Robert Heming, Houston

 
Obama Romney debate

Many of us politics junkies follow elections with fascination. The current US presidential election is no exception. In fact, due to social media and the Internet it is probably the most closely followed and watched election in history.

The first debate (of three) between US President Barack Obama and Republican challenger Mitt (what kind of name is that?) Romney illustrates neatly the election strategy that the Obama campaign is using against the Romney campaign. It is fairly well known that President Obama is a very skilled poker player in contrast to Mitt Romney whose card playing activity is probably highly constrained by his Mormon religion.

Unlike the majority of commentators, I see the first debate as a superb tactical win by Obama based on poker playing principles. Here is why.

1. One of the basic tactics in poker is to make your opponent ‘show his hand‘. This can be done in various ways such as figuring out their ‘tell’, studying how they play and raise the stakes. This is the beginning of the game.

2. A good tactic is to let an opponent grow in the confidence that they are playing well and winning. This fosters ‘over confidence’, lapses in concentration and mistakes that a good player will note but ignore initially.

3. If a player is being staked by others who are watching (ie.super-Pacs), over confidence inspired by small wins initially will cause these backers to be less cautious about committing more funds to the game thus raising the stakes higher and higher so that any eventual loss will be devastating. This is what will happen with the Romney campaign if he loses. Also these funds are tied up and cannot be diverted to Senate races which could have happened if stake holders abandon Romney at this stage.

4. If ordinary Democratic voters (many of whom are disillusioned) feel that Obama is running away with it at this stage then they won’t bother to campaign as hard or  turn out for the election. If they feel the game is slipping away they will panic and work harder believing that a Romney presidency would be a disaster. It will also reduce the expectancy on Obama as some sort of miracle worker.

I expect the next two debates will follow a pattern based on a poker playing strategy and I shall watch with fascination as the stakes are upped and the demeanour of each of the players changes. It seems clear now that a horrible fate awaits the loser of this epic contest.

I know on whom I shall be putting my money and it won’t be an each way bet either.

 

 
libor slots

You despair about the banks. Another Big Fat Worm found in the can of worms that is casino banking.

Casino banking

 

Open Letter to Cadw:
Re: your exhibition about the cartoon Princes of Gwynedd, located in a public lavatory just off the A55

Cadw down the toiletHow is it possible for an organisation charged with the preservation of a nation’s heritage to then treat it with such disrespect? As a patriotic Welshman with a developed interest in my nation’s history and culture, I am revolted and the frankly bizarre decision to place an exhibition about the Princes of Gwynedd in …. a public lavatory! You have made our history, culture and indeed our nation itself into a laughing stock throughout the world. Browse the Internet and discover how people are reacting!
Your decision at Abergwyngregyn (to use the post-conquest name) is incomprehensible – at the least level as a waste of public money – and has made me deeply ashamed and angry. Please consider my long-standing life membership of your organisation void and terminated.
I hope one day soon that those responsible for this tasteless travesty and poorly produced vulgar farce will be made publicly accountable. Your badly produced, childish and ill-sited garbled cartoons have insulted Welsh people everywhere and devalued a proud heritage.

Cadw ToiletYours with complete disrespect, Dafydd Bullock, Gorsedd y Beirdd

Photos: Kathryn Gibson

Cambria Books

New publication.
New translation of the Physicians of Myddfai by Terry Breverton

Cambria Books

New publication. Entertaining guide to the US Elections by Denis Campbell.
© 2011 CAMBRIA POLITICO Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha