IS THERE any possibility that Tory David Melding will follow the path carved out by that other UK federalist, William Gladstone, writes Clive Betts from the National Assembly press gallery.

Gladstone, who tried to introduce home rule all round (ie federalism) to Scotland and Wales in a bid to keep Ireland within the UK, started life as a Tory. He ended up as one of the greatest leaders of the Liberal Party.

Melding, the South Central AM for the Tories, is often seen as a bit detached from his party, standing much too far to the Left. He would no doubt be horrified to think of himself as a Welsh Lib Dem.

Perhaps the answer to the conundrum is that Mr Melding stays where he is politically, and the rest of the Welsh Tory Party moves leftwards, and becomes a winnable organisation once more.

Certainly Mr Melding is even less likely to follow the other federalist active at the end of the 19th century.

That was a gent by the name of Karl Marx, who went as far as using the “f” word, which Gladstone may never have done. At the same time as Gladstone was trying to sort out Ireland, Marx wrote that the way to sort out the problem was for England’s working class to “take the initiative in dissolving the Union … substituting a free federal relationship for it”.

Mr Melding provides a truly fascinating tour of the federal scenery in his Will Britain Survive Beyond 2020 ?, just published by the Institute of Welsh Affairs.

It’s a pity the volume does not include an index. Which means I’m unsure whether Mr Melding mentions Marx’s interest in the subject. My own reference is the current edition of Prospect magazine.

Speaking to Mr Melding in the Welsh equivalent of a dungeon (the area surrounding the debating chamber in the Senedd building), he assured me that he had not, in fact, mentioned Marx. No doubt, however, he is glad of an extra name for his list.

One of Mr Melding’s Tory colleagues was hardly put out by the South Central member’s thoughtful meanderings. While he himself thought federalism meant going “a bit far”, he was glad that Mr Melding was promoting thought and discussion on the issue.

Share
 

The Welsh Tory strategy for countering Nationalists appears to be to ‘give in’ on national sovereignity and full devolution but repair Unionism by insisting on ‘ federalisation’ to the UK in a sort of United States of Britain. This is prefigured in a book by David Melding AM.

Nationalists should be aware that this could potentially be a real vote winner for the Tories and could destroy the Plaid Cymru vote in the predominantly English speaking  urban constituencies of  Wales such as the South and North East and Borders.

THE United Kingdom is in danger of disintegration and should embrace a federal structure of government and create individual parliaments in each nation, Conservative AM David Melding declares in a major book published today.

He envisages a new constitutional settlement which could cut the number of MPs at Westminster to 300 and officially recognise the sovereignty over domestic issues of the parliaments of Wales, England, Scotland and Northern Ireland.

Source: David Williams

Share
 

When it comes to the Welsh language, people can harbour some very strange ideas, writes Clive Betts from the National Assembly press gallery.

The latest and strangest is that 80 per cent of AMs are Welsh-speaking.

The upshot of that claim, as made by a letter-writer to the Western Mail, is that the Assembly should be deprived of any right to take any further powers over the Welsh language because the institution is “unrepresentative”.

The gentleman, writing from that very strange town of Cardiff – where the Assembly unfortunately happens to be located – is that “political parties clearly tend to select their candidates because they can speak Welsh”.   !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Now if Mr Welton, a well-known Welsh surname, knew a little more about the relationship between politicians from various parties and the Welsh language he would realise he is speaking out of his backside.

Simply because, for the Labour party, ability to speak Welsh has usually been a negative factor, often strongly so.

Not nowadays, perhaps. But senior figures in any party originate in an earlier generation. And in the past, Labour has been tremendously anti-language in almost all parts of Wales.

That attitude continues to this day. Certain fluent Welsh-speakers never, or hardly ever, address the Assembly or its committees, through Welsh, despite the existence of continual simultaneous translation.

The Tories have been better inclined towards the language – although that party has always possessed a predilection towards looking towards the great and the good. And these people either hailed from across the border (as does the party’s present MEP, although she is in fact Welsh-speaking); or they had lost the language in previous generations when only the lower classes clung to Welsh. And such Tories of course seldom mixed with the lower classes.

The Lib Dems are a wee bit thin on Welsh-speakers; they wish they could attract a few more. They currently have to rely on Eleanor Burnham, the North AM. Sometimes they wish they could find someone else to appear on Welsh radio and TV because her comments sometimes make ones hair curl.

If a “Welsh-speaker’s dictatorship” (the words of the letter-writer) exists in the Assembly, it is strictly restricted to the ranks of Plaid Cymru. And it doesn’t extend too far in that party either, as a number of senior AMs speak little or no Welsh – or certainly don’t use it in public forums.

The Assembly has 60 members. How many can be counted as Welsh-speakers ? If you speak of members who use the language naturally, you would come up with a grand total of 19 – one Lib Dem; three Tories; five Labour and 10 Plaid.

Is that 80 per cent ? No, that is 31 pc.

Admittedly, there are a couple of AMs who have learned the language very well – but they are mostly included in the 19.

There are several more who are LEARNING it. But that’s very different from speaking it.

Unless of course you are an anti-language fanatic, and ignorant at that. Just like a few people who live in Cardiff and pontificate. But who, when questioned in detail, admit they have hardly ever come across a Welsh-speaker, and have certainly never encroached upon a Welsh-speaking area.

Some people would criticise the Mail for having printed this letter.

But that would be wrong. The writer in Cardiff is only using the same sort of distortion which is second-nature to the extremists of the British National Party.

Share
 

So now those that support Independence, a separate National identity and full Devolution for Wales know just where they stand with respect to published Labour policy. Households throughout Wales will have just received through the letter box an official  Liebour ‘Election Communication’ and it states quite clearly the following:

Welsh Labour believe this is a time for unity not ‘independence’ for Wales. We need to pull together not break away.

Most potential voters will read this at face value. ie. Labour do not support independence for Wales.  The exhortation to ‘pull together’ is a fine sentiment but hardly constitutes a political policy which will influence voters whereas  Independence and Devolution are clearly issues that our readers and Welsh voters will have a view on.

The leaflet goes on to state:

Both Plaid Cymru and the Lib Dems are ineffective in Europe and would leave Wales on the fringes without an effective voice. Labour can deliver for Wales in Europe.

Well, this is a matter of subjective opinion and Cambria Politico and many others have  frequently posted articles about the Labour/Kinnockian performance and legacy in Europe. The answer to this is clear from the record of Wales as an economy under Labour. In spite of huge EU investment (always delayed and tied up in bureaucratic knots) arguably it has gone backwards not forwards like the Irish economy.  It is also reflected in the vast growth of the Public Sector in Wales which now employs an astronomically and unsustainably large proportion (70% +) of the workforce.

Labour claims to be investing in the Future of Wales but it is the Present that needs the investment. ProfliGate, the expenses scandals has made sure that Labour will NOT be a part of the Future of Wales.


Share
 

Anti-Welsh Liebourites such as Piggy Andrews and others have recently been jumping on the bandwagon to gainsay the troubled economies of small independent nations in a pathetic attempt to cover up the devastating problems of a genuinely failing state: the good old UK.

LieBour troughersTheir argument runs something like this: These troubled times prove that Wales is far better off under the protective wings of Westminster rather than going it alone as an independent nation. Just look at small independent nations like Iceland and Ireland – they’re going bust. Isn’t it just great, especially when just a year ago these uppity little countries had GDPs which put that of the UK to shame? Well now they’re on the road to ruin, while we, under Gordon Brown’s world-saving helmsmanship are deadheading towards an early recovery. The green shoots just lurking there under the surface ready to spring to life.

Piffle and balderdash.

As Lieghton and his chums well know, Brown and Liebour’s mismanagement of the current economic crisis has saddled every man, women and child in Britain with a debt in excess of £35,000. The UK’s manufacturing base has been shot to bits; public spending (Liebour’s euphemism for electoral bribery) has reached unprecedented levels, and the whole flimsy structure is about to split apart against a backdrop of mounting public anger, a police force running out of control, and dangerous, unpopular and prohibitively costly overseas adventures to which the UK’s poorly equipped armed forces have been committed.

No wonder the Scots are asking themselves whether they want to be part of this basket case arrangement. So should we. Urgently.

Despite the grim reality of the situation charismatic Rhondda AM and “Minister for Regeneration” (!) Piggy Andrews seems happy to continue bamboozling his long-suffering constituents with a mishmash of downright twaddle and hogwash in his local organ. This is what he wrote in last week’s offering:

“They (Plaid Cymru) want to cut Wales off from the rest of Britain.

They threaten jobs coming to Wales.

Over recent years they have said that Wales should be an independent country, like Iceland.

Well, we know what has happened to Iceland in the current global economic crisis.

It is bankrupt.

An independent Wales would be bankrupt very quickly, cut off from UK and international investment.”

If, like me, you can’t honestly believe that Piggy is completely devoid of intelligent thought, then he’s got to be spouting this stuff for nefarious reasons.

The whole idea of independence is to give Wales the prosperity and economic security it lacks as part of the United Kingdom, because union with England (and the boom-and-bust policies of successive Liebour and Tory governments) has turned Wales into one of the poorest parts of the EU. The whole idea of independence is to attract inward investment into Wales, because it can’t get it under the present arrangement. The whole idea of independence is to ensure job creation in Wales and to prevent the current drain of talent as young people are forced out of the country to find work. The whole idea of independence is to put Wales at the heart of Europe with a direct voice at Europe’s decision-making top table rather than seeing it represented by dodgy second-hand car salesmen from Essex. What on earth would be the point of championing it if it wasn’t?

It’s precisely because those who get the point realise that small independent nations like Iceland and Ireland have the ability to control their own affairs – for good or ill. Iceland may be bankrupt, but this is NOT because it is independent, but because it had bad leadership and bad fiscal management in a global financial crisis.

Britain is bankrupt for the same reason.

Ireland, on the other hand – another example Liebourites use to warn of the ‘dangers’ of independence – is regularly disparaged in the British press with gleeful headlines such as “Roar goes out of Celtic Tiger” and “Celtic Crown loses Gleam” with accompanying pictures of half-drowned cats, drink-sodden leprechauns and the like, is, actually proof that small nations have a better chance than large ones. Well, better, certainly, than the poor old UK.

In an article (‘Celtic Tiger sharpens its claws for recovery’) in last week’s Financial Times, BP chairman and former EU commissioner Peter Sutherland describes Ireland’s problems as being ‘acute rather than chronic’. The article is worth quoting at length because it clearly shows the unfathomable chasm between the incisive analysis of a brilliant international economist on the one hand, and the bizarre ramblings of a puffed-up buffoon from the backbenches of Wales’s toothless Assembly on the other.

“The reasons for the deficit are well known,” writes Sutherland, “Ireland’s growth and tax revenues, from about 2003, became overly dependent on housing. So, when the property bubble burst, the economy slowed sharply and tax revenues plummeted. The problems of the Irish banks are related to this issue too (their exposure to US mortgage-backed securities and other non-domestic toxic assets is minimal).

While the housing slowdown and the associated budget deficit has created a major challenge, to focus exclusively on housing-related problems provides a distorted picture of the under lying health of the Irish economy. The economy has been a phenomenon since the late 1980s. From a relatively poor country on Europe’s periphery, Ireland has risen to become one of the richest economies in the world in 20 years. Even after an anticipated 8 per cent fall this year, its GDP per capita, in terms of purchasing power, will remain significantly higher than that of the UK or Germany. And, while unemployment has risen, there are still 80 per cent more jobs in Ireland today than 15 years ago. Much of its infrastructure has been transformed during this period.

Since 2007, Ireland’s current account position has been rising and, at the current trajectory, it should return to surplus by the year end. To the extent that Irish public sector borrowing has been rising, this is being more than offset by a rise in private sector saving.

The cause of these favourable statistics is export-led growth, led by inward investment in industries such as information technology, pharmaceuticals and private sector services. The fact that Ireland’s economic success has been driven by exports in these areas has resulted in a far stronger basic Irish economy than the one that existed in the 1980s. Because of the nature of these exports the drop in exports anticipated for this year, as a result of recession, is estimated to be only 5.9 per cent. The corresponding Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development figure for Germany is 16.5 per cent, France 11.4 per cent and Great Britain 9.8 per cent. Some others are considerably worse, such as Japan, forecast at 26.4 per cent.

Another issue on which there has been much comment is the alleged disadvantage to Ireland of being in the eurozone. In reality, Ireland may have been saved by its membership from the possibility of a run on its currency – however unwarranted such a run would have been. The UK, meanwhile, has seen its currency fall by 30 per cent against the euro and this is likely to bring short-run benefits. This option is not, of course, available to Ireland; flexibility has had to come instead from an adjustment in real wages. But – and this is the most important positive for Ireland’s long-term prospects – there is clear evidence that it is dealing with the competitiveness issue in a sustainable manner and one I believe to be unprecedented in the OECD area.

The latest data suggest there has already been an 8 per cent drop in private sector wages and salaries and, via the “pension levy”, there has also been in effect a 7-8 per cent fall in public sector pay. It is hard to imagine wages in other economies displaying such flexibility. If these figures are maintained or even supplemented, the Irish economy should emerge from the recession in a highly competitive position. Meanwhile, the minister of finance has given an undertaking to maintain Ireland’s low corporation tax rate of 12.5 per cent.

It has to be recognised that Ireland has a very open economy.

Ireland’s problems are acute in nature rather than chronic. Once Ireland overcomes this short-term panic – and I believe that last week’s budget, whatever its alleged deficiencies, was a vital step in this process – the basic strengths of the Irish economy remain formidable. If the Irish people continue to react constructively to the harsh measures necessary, Ireland will be in a very strong position to benefit from the eventual global recovery and its healthy demographic profile will greatly help in this.”

Piggy and his cronies need to wise up. Yes, we all know that the recession is global; but it will be small nations like Ireland who will see the first green shoots of recovery rather than Britain’s benighted wasteland.


by Cuneglas

Share
 

I read with interest (Western Mail 2nd April) that certain ‘eminent’ ex-pats want a vote in any future referendum on full law making powers for the Welsh Assembly. They say that anyone of Welsh birth or parentage living outside Wales should be allowed to determine how those still living inside Wales are governed. Interesting.

Amongst these patriotic ‘exiles’ are Lord Garel-Jones (Tory), Lord Howe (Tory), Lord Cranbourne (Tory) and Lord Kinnock of Bedwellty (Labour). Their lordships all hinted that they would not go along with granting more powers to Wales as it might endanger “the Union”. It is quite understandable that they would oppose any such moves in that direction – “the Union” has served them well and they don’t want the natives to rock the boat.

But this notion could backfire. Unlike these wealthy establishment careerists, who left Wales through choice, many ordinary working people were forced to leave Wales through no fault of their own. They had to move in order to find employment elsewhere because the London government had failed to provide decent jobs for them in their own country.

I’m sure that, if given the choice, many of these economic migrants would vote for a positive change in their homeland. The status quo let them down and a new approach is desperately needed and should be welcomed. If we have sufficient self-confidence and determination, we will eventually find our own answers to our own problems. We need to take on this responsibility and start making important decisions ourselves.

And what about all the ‘exiles’ from other countries now living here, such as students from outside Wales, holiday home owners, temporary residents and those that don’t intend to settle here or consider themselves to be in any way Welsh? Will they have a vote in a referendum? Will they be allowed to decide the future governance of the indigenous population?

It’s a fair question. If only certain people outside Wales are granted a referendum vote, (because they are “Welsh”), then, using the same criteria, it follows that only certain people inside Wales should be granted one too. What’s sauce for the goose …

Byline: Rhobert ap Steffan, Llangadog.

Share
 

Welsh LabourIt’s a delicious moment for Welsh patriots. Savour it, and then move on. There are a great many battles still to fight, but at least Welsh Liebour is on the run. As the shoddy amalgam of the ambitious, the venal, the craven and the power-hungry descends towards meltdown, one of the very few decent Welsh people left in the party – soon-to-retire Rhodri Morgan has tried to get a grip of his disintegrating party by ordering the pulling of the lamentable “Sound of Stupidity” video from the ether. It’s pretty obvious that this has been done on “orders from above”. While poor old Gordo wrestles with the problems in saving the world, his Welsh minions are busy queering his pitch in what was once Liebour’s golden heartlands.

The silly farce dreamt up by Peter Hain, Piggy Andrews and Eluned Morgan, (general dogsbody to the Anglesey fishwife Glenys “Glen” Kinnock) turned sour pretty quickly. As for the peevish post that the “Sound of Stupidity” video was pulled because of “complaints from humourless nationalists and tories”, these were the very people desperately searching for a copy of the wretched nonsense to put up on You Tube because they knew how wonderfully harmful to Liebour it is. As long as we can view it on the web, so it will remain.

(By the way if you missed it, you can see it here in all its splendour: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IT_CqY-eOYQ )

All of which leads us to the question ‘what has Peter Hain got do with Wales? Why is he here?’ The expensively primped, orange-skinned lounge-lizard was born in Kenya, came to us via South Africa and, of all things, the Liberal Party, and was parachuted into Neath where he was guaranteed a safe seat for life. Neath is – for the time being at least – one of those “if-they-put-up-a-monkey” constituencies, but as the Liebour meltdown continues may not remain so for long. Elements of this scenario will of course have inevitably brought another waste-of-space to mind. Step forward Piggy Andrews, pasty faced, charisma-by-passed AM for Rhondda (another of those ‘i-t-p-u-a-m’ constituencies), former Liberal and now rising Welsh Liebour star (the mind boggles). Which brings us breathlessly to another point. Why did Hain and Piggy join Labour in the first place if it wasn’t for the prospect of power? Lets’ face it, you’re not going to get very far with the Lib-Dems either in Westminster of in the Senedd. The same question could be asked of a number of others like Gwilym Prys-Davies, Denzil Davies, Elystan Morgan, Rhodri Morgan and Carwyn Jones, all of them, unlike most of their peers, decent men. The answer is simple. It is because it was once perceived that in order to achieve anything in politics in Wales, you had to do it through the Labour party. The choice was limited. Which,  with the emergence of Plaid Cymru as a serious and powerful force in Welsh politics, makes the defection of Plaid turncoat Alun Davies to the ‘nest of traitors and lickspittles’ one of the most extraordinary acts of idiocy in recent times.

In any case, let us delight, momentarily, in Liebour’s gross embarrassment over it’s “Obama moment”, and wait for the next one. It won’t be long a-coming.

From the desk of: The Rev Idwal Lloyd-Price

Share
 
Scuttling the SNPUnder the 30 year rule much has been revealed about how the British Government tried to scuttle Scottish Nationalism in the 1970′s.
This programme in Gaelic, from BBC Alba with English subtitles, looks at dirty tricks from the 1950s to the late ’70s – from the theft of the Stone of Destiny from Westminster Abbey to the work of agent provocateurs (eg. John Cullen BEM) through to the discovery of oil in the North Sea.
Did you know there was a plan to persuade Orkney and Shetland to break away from Scotland, Ulster style, and to shift the sea boundary north from Berwick rather than east so that the Forties Oil Fields would remain in the UK?
If you’ve got an hour watch this. It’s fascinating and true!
Click below (BBCi Player)
Hat tip:  Castro
Share

Cambria Books

New publication. Important contribution to our knowledge of the Arab Spring by Denis Campbell.
© 2011 CAMBRIA POLITICO Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha