Huw LewisJust when it all appeared to be going swimmingly well for ultra-left, ultra-unionist devo-sceptic Labour leadership candidate Huw ‘Screwloose’ Lewis – suddenly it’s all gone pear-shaped.

Over the last few weeks in the gripping battle to succeed Rhodri Morgan as First minister of Wales, it appeared that rank outsider Screwloose, despite having more chips on his shoulders than Harry Ramsdens on a Saturday night, might yet slip under the radar and bring the contest to a tight finish.

Obvious favourite Carwyn Jones, a patriotic Welshman and the only contender with enough gravitas to lead a political party, wimped out on the burning issue facing Wales: increased powers for the Assembly – apparently terrified of being labelled a closet nationalist. Meanwhile statuesque valkyrie Edwina Hart’s campaign ran messily into the mud with an unnecessary and unwise spat over the future of Faith Schools.

No mention of anything remotely anti-Welsh, rabidly unionist or loony-left. Suddenly Screwloose seemed to be a contender. The former chemistry teacher’s 5-minute interview on Thursday’s AM/PM programme actually gave the impression of a reasonable, softly-spoken family man and with no mention of anything remotely anti-Welsh, rabidly unionist or loony-left as might have been expected. When considered against the lacklustre efforts of Edwina and Carwyn on the same programme, you’d have fancied his chances.

But then came the headline…

KINNOCKS THROW WEIGHT BEHIND HUW LEWIS’ VISION FOR WALES!

and the dream is all but over.

Political clowns

The very idea of this Wales-hating duo of political clowns and abject failures (Kinnock as Labour leader, Glenys as a globetrotting ‘Welsh’ MEP who failed to champion one single local issue, and latterly as a disastrously bad Foreign Office minister) giving a boost to anyone in this contest is as laughable as it is pathetic. Here is a couple whose loathing of Wales, its people, language, culture and history (Kinnock is on record as saying that that Wales didn’t have any) is matched only by an obscene greed for wealth and gargantuan appetite for adulation (see Cambriapolitico passim). Lewis simpered that he was “honoured and humbled to have the backing of two such great party figures”, adding bizarrely that Kinnock was somehow responsible for having “saved the party from electoral extinction”, when the exact opposite was the case. He famously and disastrously lost Labour an election condemning it to years in the wilderness until Tony Blair recreated it along Tory lines in the lead up to the New Labour victory of 1997.

Champagne-swilling freeloaders

The very idea of the avowed socialist AM for Merthyr Tydfil – who lives with his AM wife in comfortable middle-class style in the leafy avenues of smart, upmarket Penarth (he claims his “passion is to rid Wales of the curse of child poverty”) – being endorsed by a duo of champagne-swilling multi-millionaire freeloaders and political dinosaurs, is one step too far.

Let’s hope what remains of the Labour Party in Wales has the sense to see straight through this grotesque charade.

By Cynfelyn

Editor’s Note

Wales gives notice to Liebour’s Stalinist bullies – we will not be silenced!

After due consideration by Cambriapolitico’s legal counsel, we feel that the people of Wales have the right to read, in full, our contributor Cynfelyn’s article which has induced such a hissy-fit in Huw Lewis’s highly-strung henchmen Matt Greenough and Luke Holland.

The idiotic idea that reminding readers of Huw Lewis’s nickname “Screwloose” – it’s been applied to him in political circles in Cardiff Bay for some considerable time – and, DOH!, it’s also er… a play on his name, is in anyway a comment on his mental health, should send those who thought it up scrambling onto the couch of their own therapists in Cathedral Road.

The whole silly exercise shows how running scared Liebour’s lost legions
are, and that’s what’s made them so pathetically – and babyishly – touchy.

As we have said – be warned – this is a foretaste of the sort of intimidatory regime a Huw Lewis Liebour leadership will mean.

Share
 

Carwyn Jones AMA possible hint as to who would be the new leader of the Labour Party who is best fitted to serve ALL of Wales.

Carwyn Jones was presenting the cabinet weekly press briefing. And it was all set out for bilingualism presentation.

Translation sets at each journalist’s seat and an official carrying a wandering microphone – to ensure that the translators could hear what had to be translated.

Now, I am totally unsure that the bilingual Mr Jones has always availed himself of the system.

Certainly, in the early days of the Assembly, the only AMs who were sure to use Welsh were those in Plaid Cymru, and Rhodri Morgan – principally to answer oral questions.

But today Mr Jones threw himself strongly into the bilingual camp. Several of his fellow Labour AMs have over the years doggedly avoided the Welsh language – presumably because of its connection with another political party.

But no problem with Mr Jones. Which augers well for if he wins the Labour leadership.

Now, it may be that today was nothing out of the ordinary. But with reports being heard that Edwina Hart, his main opponent, has voiced anti-language thoughts – very much in line with her party’s subliminal attitude over a century, a very close eye has to be kept on the Labour Party.

Share
 

I WAS told this by a Tory AM, so I can’t vouch for it myself, writes Clive Betts from the Assembly press gallery.

As we know, Edwina Hart is not the world’s leader at personal relationships.

The Western Mail carried a piece saying that Carl Sargeant had decided to give his backing to Carwyn Jones, Counsel General and AM for Bridgend, because he was the only of the three contestants who had approached Carl for his support.

I was speaking to the Tory about Edwina’s weakness over personal relationships.

Which was when I was told that Carl and Edwina had been seen in close chat in the Assembly coffee shop.

The Tory thought this had been in response to the piece in the Western Mail.

Edwina possesses some good support among the ranks of non-labourites. They see her as extremely competent, extremely frank, and extremely keen to make the right impression over decisions.

Labour possesses an extremely complicated voting procedure – with three voting stages – to chose the new leader. Which means no-one knows beforehand who will win.

But opposition parties give Edwina a very strong chance. Possibly ahead of front-runner Carwyn

We shall see. Decision day is December 1.

Share
 

A LIB DEM with a sense of humour gave his backing yesterday to health minister Edwina Hart to succeed Rhodri Morgan as leader of the Labour Party in Wales, writes Clve Betts from the Assembly press gallery.

The individual – who shall remain nameless – wanted Edwina to win because of the “liveliness” which would ensue.

That means, it is reckoned that Edwina, AM for Gower, would upset enough people  to ensure that the Assembly is a very “lively” place.

Mrs Hart is certainly either  first or second in the race. She is extremely able and cuts a fine figure for Wales.

I spoke also to a prominent Labour figure – not an AM – who is also supporting Edwin. And, unlike my Lib Dem figure, he possesses a vote.

He cited her ability, the public figure she cuts, and the prominence she would give to Wales.  But he also admitted her one failing.

In the piece written by David Williamson in the Western Mail, Mrs Hart is quoted is saying about herself, “You get on with people.”

My Labour contact agreed with my Lib Dem contact. That Mrs Hart is a very lively character. In the way that she can be superb with a person or an issue one day, while the very next she will cut them dead.

I wonder whether the “liveliness” that many see in Mrs Hart is the “liveliness” that the Assembly necessarily wants.

Mind, there’s another side to the job. The current administration in Cardiff is a coalition. According to Plaid ministers, Mrs Hart is a true pillar of that coalition. She helped to build it. And she’ll keep it going.

Whether Mrs Hart is nice to journalists and such characters is beside the point when you’re running a coalition government.

So there !

Share
 

News that plans for the Murder Academy at St Athan are in serious jeopardy will lift the hearts of Welsh patriots. The Sunday Times reports that the whole project is threatened as the contractor Metrix, which is lead by the ‘defence group’ Qinetiq, is struggling to get the £1.3 billion from the banks needed to keep the project afloat.

A New Liebour pipe dream built on lies and half-truths.

Those of us who have been following developments over the last couple of years with mounting disgust will hope that this signals the beginning of the end for this ill-conceived and sinister knavery, largely peddled by Labour Vale of Glamorgan MP John Smith. Smith, a faceless New Liebour fellow traveller, will be defending a slim majority of just 1808 at the next general election, has high hopes that the project might just save his skin. It was Smith, you will remember, who once gushed about Barry experiencing a 21st century Welsh rerun of the Californian Gold Rush, with 5,000 new jobs, and a spanking new ‘centre of excellence’ infrastructure bringing as yet undreamed of benefits to the whole of South Wales. It is turning out to be just another New Liebour pipe dream built on lies and half-truths. And thank goodness it is.

Anyone with any sense knows that any ‘Defence Training Academy’ worth its salt would need a huge influx of highly qualified specialist personnel into the area, and that means around 4,500 of the new jobs. Such an invasion would bring with it all the unsavoury curses of a large-scale military presence with vastly increased traffic and construction, not forgetting the inevitable increase in violence and drunken behaviour and resulting local resentment. Any jobs left over for locals would be those of the order of cleaners, security personnel, ancillary labour, cooks and bottle-washers.

We’ve seen it all before. Remember the sweeteners to attract valuable inward investment by the old WDA? Remember the jobs-for-the-boys of the 1980s and 90s, the reneged deals, the red faces, the desolate, unoccupied state-of-the-art ‘facilities’?

Another idiotic splurge of public money

A recent idiotic splurge of public money, incidentally, was right there at St Athan with the much vaunted “Project Red Dragon” – an aeronautical ‘super hangar’ maintenance centre. Back in 2003, this promised us the creation of, 3,300 jobs and a lot more besides because the new facility was to open its doors to commercial aviation concerns. Ribbons were cut, red carpets laid, champagne sprayed, and First Minister Rhodri Morgan promised the inevitable ‘bright new future’ from the regulation bright new ‘centre of excellence’. Within a year the project was on the rocks with a loss of 550 already existing jobs – the result of sensible rationalisation and a more realistic bid by the RAF.

You’d have thought we’d have seen this one coming then? No, Liebour just can’t help it.

The Sunday Times article continues: “Ministers have insisted that the troubled programme to centralise the military’s specialised engineering and technical training at St Athan in South Wales is back on track and would be signed before MPs’ summer recess.”

“But officials revealed that the deal would not now be signed off before the recess, with the possibility that contractor Metrix, led by defence group Qinetiq, “could walk away”. The memo admits that the “currently planned programme will be hard to achieve” and the implementation team is “conducting fall-back planning”.

“The state has provided another £44m to keep the project going, a sum recently confirmed in a parliamentary minute. The government came under fire this year when it emerged that it had already provided “contingent liability” funding of about £50m.”

‘Fall-back planning’? Sound idea – as long as all the bills, the sweeteners, the perks and the pensions are settled first of course – all from a total that’s not far off £100 million of public money.

Afghan adventure costs Wales £127,000,000 a year

In the light of the current financial crisis, a government defence spending review is now looking seriously at Britain’s Trident programme – the true cost of which, including the purchase of new missiles, the replacement of existing nuclear submarines and the overall costs of maintaining the entire system for 30 years was, in 2006, estimated at £76 billion. It is significantly greater today.

The government is also re-examining the construction of two vast 65,000 ton super aircraft carriers, the original budget for which has risen by a quarter to £5 billion (from an original £3.9 billion). In view of the obvious and urgent need to cut public expenditure, why on earth is Britain still trying to punch so far above its weight when it patently can’t afford it? Why is Britain still sending a foreign aid package of £825 million to India, a nuclear power with its own space research programme and one of the fastest-growing economies of the world? Why is Britain pursuing a winless war in Afghanistan with troops issued with inferior equipment which is patently not fit for purpose, at an annual cost to the British taxpayer of more than £2.5 billion – that’s a cost, incidentally, to Welsh taxpayers of a staggering £127,000,000 a year. Think also of the terrible, criminal loss of life Liebour’s ill-conceived adventures in Iraq and Afghanistan have brought about, and there’s no sign of the latter ending any time soon.

No! to saving John Smith’s parliamentary career

Commenting on the latest developments Mark Pritchard, Conservative MP for The Wrekin in Shropshire, a fierce opponent of the scheme, whose own constituency has a location and facilities which provide a far more feasible and cost-effective option said: “With further delays and escalating costs, no more public money should be allocated to the programme until its viability has been fully considered.” You’ve said it!

Angharad Mair asked recently “Is this the kind of development we really need or want here in Wales?” adding that the St Athan military academy would “be the military centre for the whole of the UK, and that could bring dire consequences to Wales, as well as turning a beautiful and peaceful part of our country into what would have to be a security-obsessed nightmare. In Wales we have a long and proud tradition of peace and pacifism, and that should be enough reason to condemn this horrific development.”

Indeed, the building of Murder Academies in Wales has an ignominious history. In September 1936 a ’Bombing School’ set up to train RAF pilots in the arts of aerial bombardment was burnt down by a group of Welsh patriots, Saunders Lewis, D.J. Williams and Lewis Valentine, outraged at the desecration of one of the most beautiful parts of Gwynedd. As with St Athan, there were perfectly good alternative sites in England, one in Dorset and the other in Northumberland. Both had been rejected after protests by local historians and naturalists. Wales, then as now, was singled out for the privilege.

The answer to the Murder Academy must be NO on every count:

NO to saving John Smith’s lacklustre parliamentary career, NO to disrupting and overwhelming the communities of South Wales and the outstandingly beautiful Vale of Glamorgan, NO to squandering further taxpayers’ money, NO to swelling the coffers of unscrupulous and sinister ‘defence’ consortia – and most important of all, NO to creating a monstrous colonial leviathan which will serve to bind a steadily devolving Wales to a rapidly failing England with titanic bands of armoured steel.

Sources:

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/public_sector/article6638748.ece

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2006/sep/21/military.armstrade

Share
 

Peter HainDoes he still claim for his old mum as secretary?

The Sunday Times has uncovered that Peter Hain, despite being made Welsh secretary  is still a partner in a firm that specialises in political communications. Haywood Hain, a consultancy set up with his second-wife claimed to have a “detailed understanding of the political landscape in the UK” on its website and used Hain’s London home as the office address.

Ah, bless him. Old dogs new tricks. Call the vet.

Share
 

The Kinnocks: an unreserved and abject apology from Cambriapolitico

We make an unreserved and abject apology to the readers of Cambriapolitico. We got it badly wrong.

We were wrong, wrong, wrong!

parasiteWe calculated – from a series of given data – the extent of the Kinnock’s murky empire, and we badly UNDERESTIMATED their booty by many millions of pounds. Revelations in this week’s Sunday Times which are repeated almost verbatim in today’s Wasting Mule, show that the Kinnocks have grossed in excess of a staggering £10,000,000 in property speculation, salaries, expenses and pensions over fifteen years of “public service” on behalf of (in the Ginger Whinger’s case) “Great Britain” as EU Commissioner, and (in the Anglesey Fishwife’s case) in the service of the people of Wales (for Wales, incidentally, read Africa, tuna fish, mangos, bananas and bushmeat ….anything BUT Wales. Oh and p-u-h-l-e-a-s-e, not the ghastly Welsh language). £10,000,000? That’s a badly needed dialysis unit or a specialist children’s facility so badly lacking in Welsh hospitals. But no, it’s all gone on Neil and Glen’s champagne and goodies, trinkets and fripperies, junkets and high jinks. Are you complaining? Well you ought to be.

Bloodsuckers and Welsh suckers

Now revealed as bloodsucking parasites on the UK’s body politic in all its tawdry squalor, the “Socialist” Clan Kinnock continues its ride on the governmental and European gravy train with an ever-swelling bundle of ongoing salaries, perks and pensions.

Baron Kinnock of Bedwellty’s reaction to the revelations? “No Comment”

The soon-to-be “elevated” (?!) Baroness Kinnock’s response? “Unavailable for comment”.

These are the very same brown-nosing Anglophiles who campaigned against the EU in the 1970s, are still campaigning against further devolved powers for Wales (on the heads of whose blinkered voters they clambered the greasy pole to “up yours” prosperity) and a against a new Welsh Language Act. One wonders how on earth the Fishwife’s other “elevation” to Minister for Europe is tenable or justifiable when ordinary MPs are being hauled over the coals for the lesser crimes of ‘flipping’, moat cleaning and indenting for lipstick. They pale into insignificance against the crimes of the Kinnock Gang – all, you understand, strictly committed “within the rules” and, of course, under the radar.

It is time for the voters of Wales to create an unholy outcry about the stink rising from the overflowing sewer that is Liebour whether Welsh or English.

Share
 

Peter HainUnbelievable but we are being foisted with both Peter Hain and Glenys Kinnock yet again.

Guido Fawkes was the first political blogger to have a go at Peter Hain and here is his reaction below

Hain is we are told heading back to the Welsh Office.  Is it because of his brilliance?  When Gordon sacked him last time it was for incompetence.
Is it because he is clean when it comes to his expenses and will demonstrate the sincerity of Brown’s plans to clean up politics?  This is the man who failed to declare £100,000 laundered through a think tank / slush fund for his deputy leadership campaign.  Hain, do not forget, was the cabinet minister who argued for the change in the system that allowed ministers to designate their London home as their second home, he “employs” his 80 year-old mother at the taxpayer’s expense to look after his interests, such a shame she never actually visits his office…

Diolch i chi  Gordon Brown.


Share