When it comes to the Welsh language, people can harbour some very strange ideas, writes Clive Betts from the National Assembly press gallery.

The latest and strangest is that 80 per cent of AMs are Welsh-speaking.

The upshot of that claim, as made by a letter-writer to the Western Mail, is that the Assembly should be deprived of any right to take any further powers over the Welsh language because the institution is “unrepresentative”.

The gentleman, writing from that very strange town of Cardiff – where the Assembly unfortunately happens to be located – is that “political parties clearly tend to select their candidates because they can speak Welsh”.   !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Now if Mr Welton, a well-known Welsh surname, knew a little more about the relationship between politicians from various parties and the Welsh language he would realise he is speaking out of his backside.

Simply because, for the Labour party, ability to speak Welsh has usually been a negative factor, often strongly so.

Not nowadays, perhaps. But senior figures in any party originate in an earlier generation. And in the past, Labour has been tremendously anti-language in almost all parts of Wales.

That attitude continues to this day. Certain fluent Welsh-speakers never, or hardly ever, address the Assembly or its committees, through Welsh, despite the existence of continual simultaneous translation.

The Tories have been better inclined towards the language – although that party has always possessed a predilection towards looking towards the great and the good. And these people either hailed from across the border (as does the party’s present MEP, although she is in fact Welsh-speaking); or they had lost the language in previous generations when only the lower classes clung to Welsh. And such Tories of course seldom mixed with the lower classes.

The Lib Dems are a wee bit thin on Welsh-speakers; they wish they could attract a few more. They currently have to rely on Eleanor Burnham, the North AM. Sometimes they wish they could find someone else to appear on Welsh radio and TV because her comments sometimes make ones hair curl.

If a “Welsh-speaker’s dictatorship” (the words of the letter-writer) exists in the Assembly, it is strictly restricted to the ranks of Plaid Cymru. And it doesn’t extend too far in that party either, as a number of senior AMs speak little or no Welsh – or certainly don’t use it in public forums.

The Assembly has 60 members. How many can be counted as Welsh-speakers ? If you speak of members who use the language naturally, you would come up with a grand total of 19 – one Lib Dem; three Tories; five Labour and 10 Plaid.

Is that 80 per cent ? No, that is 31 pc.

Admittedly, there are a couple of AMs who have learned the language very well – but they are mostly included in the 19.

There are several more who are LEARNING it. But that’s very different from speaking it.

Unless of course you are an anti-language fanatic, and ignorant at that. Just like a few people who live in Cardiff and pontificate. But who, when questioned in detail, admit they have hardly ever come across a Welsh-speaker, and have certainly never encroached upon a Welsh-speaking area.

Some people would criticise the Mail for having printed this letter.

But that would be wrong. The writer in Cardiff is only using the same sort of distortion which is second-nature to the extremists of the British National Party.

Share
 

Expect major changes to the National Assembly when the Tories enter No 10.

George Osborne, shadow chancellor, promised in blunt irreversible sentences to work solidly with the Cardiff body when David Cameron takes over in Downing Street.

St.David's Day parade at the Welsh AssemblyAnd much more. If necessary, Cardiff will get extra  powers.

Which means anti-devolution characters such as David Davies, MP for Monmouth, and his fellow backwoodsmen, Stephen Crabb, Presili, and shadow minister for Wales David Jones can go and get lost.

Not, I am sure, that Mr Jones needs such an invitation – when an AM he was a conscientious loyalist to whatever the party line was, as expressed, usually, by devolutionist Nick Bourne.

Mr Osborne’s comments were expressed in a press conference at the Tories’ Cardiff conference after he had delivered his keynote speech on the economy.

The first issue he dealt with, when speaking to the press, was co-operation between the two cities.  He offered not an iota of hope for those who want to do away with the Assembly.

The institutions both in Cardiff and Edinburgh are here to say. And to work. And work well.  “We now understand devolution, and Wales must make its own decisions,” Mr Osborne told the press. He added that “we want to work” with both Cardiff and Edinburgh.

Plenty of experts have been saying for some time that the biggest problem for Cardiff and Britain is the unsustainable state of the Labour “settlement”.

Mr Osborne said, ” I am open-minded on looking at powers, on whether they should be changed or added to.”

Afterwards, Assembly leader Nick Bourne listed Mr Osborne as one of those favouring development of the Assembly.

The Cardiff hierarchy were pleased with what he said. They were scathing about the anti-devolution clique hidden around David Davies, who did not seem to be present.

Mr Osborne shows why the Tory Party is such a success historically. It accepts change, and works to make things work.

This blog was penned a short time ago. Since then I have been working on getting my systems working once more. Several more blogs will be sent on what happened at the Tory conference.

Each was written immediately after the events it refers to.  Thus, David Jones makes another appearance later. But this blog was not altered to take account of later happenings.

Share
 

The initial meeting of the All-Wales Convention – tasked with plotting the road forward to a more-powers referendum – revealed a fascinating seating plan.

The meeting was held in a conference room in the Pierhead building – where Ron Davies had planned to install his cabinet, with himself installed next door to today’s meeting in the former dock company managing director’s office,

The 16 members are tasked with recommending to the First Minster and Deputy by the end of next year the next stages in the more-powers saga. Basically, they have to report whether the people of Wales want to move to obtaining Scottish-style powers.

Of course, this job has also been carried out by the 10-member Richard Commission – which worked in an almost identical fashion,  and reported to the aforementioned First Minister in 2004 after spending around £1m on a very similar series of public meetings around Wales. Labour around No 10 then got cold feet – which is why Wales is having to do it again. Continue reading »

Share

Cambria Books

New publication. Important contribution to our knowledge of the Arab Spring by Denis Campbell.
© 2011 CAMBRIA POLITICO Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha