Now #WikiLeeks, Wales’s own whistleblower website, targets Assembly politicians with astonishing revelations!

Truly shocking revelations from secret files intercepted by #WikiLeeks sympathisers mean that Welsh politics will never be the same again!

WikiLeeks

Share
 

NEW PIGGY ANDREWS SECOND HOME SHOCK

Pig SwillIf you had any doubts that the National Assembly is a far more cost-effective solution to Wales’s democratic deficit, just look at the list of AMs claiming for second homes.

Not for them the flipping, ducking, moat-diving of their Westminster counterparts, and all for the fairly simple reason that Wales is a relatively small country. Obviously those who live in our remoter regions are entitled to, and do, claim for a second home near their place of work in Cardiff Bay, which is perfectly fit and fine.

But what of those who live within an hour or so from the Senedd? Well most – from all parties – honourably decline to claim for a second home, and are happy to make the journey by car or train. So when your constituency is just 30 minutes away -and with good dual-carriageway/arterial road links for the most part – quite obviously you wouldn’t either be entitled to claim for a second home, nor would you have the brass nerve to do so. Or would you?

Step into the spotlight – once again – Piggy Andrews! Piggy is AM for Rhondda just 20 or so miles from Cardiff Bay and lives in a prestigious area of our capital city in the agreeable home he shares with his good lady Ann Beynon, head of BT’s pisspoor, failing Welsh operation. Now, what we’d like to know, is whether Piggy’s been partial to a bit of flipping himself. Following details of Piggy’s extraordinary second-home claim by Martin Shipton, serious doubts about the propriety of the charismatic ‘Minister for Regeneration’ just won’t go away until he comes clean about exactly which house he is claiming as his ‘second home’: the one he has in the Rhondda or the one he shares with Beynon in Cardiff.

One also wonders how is it possible for other Labour AMs who live even further away from Cardiff Bay perform their tasks without the need of a second home?

Other thorny niggles arise. If Piggy is claiming for the house in Cardiff’s leafy groves, does Beynon contribute to the mortgage? Do they own the house jointly? Does Beynon get a housing allowance as Wales’s BT supremerene?

We need to know the answers quickly, so that our hitherto blameless National Assembly isn’t brought into the same disrepute as the fallen ‘Mother of Parliaments’.

Share
 

Time to call time on Wales’s Westminster freeloaders

If ever there was a need to get rid of an ‘extra, expensive and useless tier of government’ (the old chestnut once much loved by critics of the National Assembly) it is now. And the tier that should be in our sights is that which consists of Wales’s 40 Members of Parliament and some 48 Members of the House of Lords.

In the light of the unfolding constitutional cataclysm which has broken over a benighted Westminster, and which has revealed a veritable rats’ nest of, in varying degrees and combinations, incompetence, profligacy and downright criminality, why not let’s get rid of the lot of them – and run our own affairs.

Quite apart from Liebour’s costly – in terms of wasted resources and young lives – and winless wars, quite apart from the idiocy of maintaining Trident as a ‘unilateral deterrent’ (which isn’t unilateral at all) and the construction of vast new aircraft carriers (to defend what against whom exactly?), when Britain has a national debt now hitting almost incomprehensible trillions of pounds, Welsh taxpayers have to shoulder the phenomenal cost of subsidising a largely useless gang of gravy-trainers zipping up and down from London to Wales in Great Western’s First Class coaches enjoying a more than a few doubles-and-mixers on the way. Time to call time.

Here are the facts. An MP’s basic salary is £64,000, – ‘Spudface’, Wayne ‘Smacked Backside’ David, Chris ‘Y-front’ Bryant and others serving either as members of the Cabinet or holding junior ministerial posts rack up a whole lot more, including ministerial residences, chauffeur-driven limousines, personal staffs, expenses etc. In addition MP’s get a second home allowance of £20,000, and an expenses allowance to cover the cost of offices, staff, researchers etc – which is, in reality often abused with MPs employing family members and hangers-on. If we take a broad average these come to somewhere in the region of £150,000 per MP, which amounts to an average of £250,000 per MP per annum and, with 40 Welsh MPs, that’s a staggering £10,000,000 shouldered by you and I. And for what?

If you reckon that £10,000,000 good value for money, study the records of the vast majority of these politico’s, especially in the light of The Daily Telegraph’s revelations, and think again. Add to this figure the Welsh taxpayer’s share of the maintenance of the Palace of Westminster with its antediluvian rituals and rigmarole, the subsidised food and wine in Westminster’s many bars and restaurants. Add the attendance allowance*, expenses, perks and backhanders (that’s lobbying fees to you and me)** of Welsh members of the House of Lords and the figure rapidly doubles, if not trebles. All this before we ask ourselves what these people actually do for us. Oh and ponder awhile on Baron Kinnock of Bedwellty in starched linen bib-and-tucker dining on the finest foie gras and agreeable claret – all of which you are paying for – and remind yourself what you and your family are having for supper. Ponder also if you will, on the Orange Lounge-lizard’s chameleon-like makeover – which you and I have generously granted him: new home, new wife…and new shed roof! We’d all like at least two of those, wouldn’t we, but they’re probably a little beyond our reach in these difficult times.

Wales now has a democratically elected representative body in our capital city. It is called The National Assembly. It’s been there for ten years. It works – but it could work better with full law-making powers, and, better still, sovereignty. Why on earth do we need another body anywhere else? Why pay twice for democracy?

A vast majority of the issues raised by individual constituents can be handled in Cardiff, and a great number of these are actually duplicated by MPs and AMs at even greater cost – and waste. We are in a deepening recession. Britain isn’t working.

The drive for independence – the drive for sanity – must start now. Time to say ‘Enough is enough, you are no longer fit for purpose.’

* Their noble lord and ladyships can claim a £150 per day attendance allowance, £75 per day subsistence allowance (that’s the foie gras and claret), and £65 per day office costs. In addition there are generous UK – and European – travelling expenses, an annual secretarial allowance of around £5,000 per year, and free postage.

** Earlier this month two Liebour peers, Lords Truscott and Taylor, were dismissed from the House of Lords for taking bribes disguised as ‘lobbying fees’.

Share
 

A couple of weeks ago the Assembly announced that £38m was to be spent on ‘revitalising’ run-down coastal towns in the north. This week the Assembly announced another £22m on a “targeted clean-up campaign” for the Valleys.

That’s a total of £60m, big bucks in any language. Yet the Assembly cannot guarantee that the expenditure will create a single job! The geniuses down in Cardiff docks merely hope that this tarting up will make these areas more attractive to tourists. This is optimism of a kind that makes a child putting a lost milk tooth under its pillow look like a ruthless investor.

For an underfunded body like the Assembly to spend this kind of money and then hope that someone comes along with ideas for starting businesses and providing jobs is also a dereliction of duty. And further confirms what we all suspected, anyway – these buggers have run out of ideas.

From another angle . . . We have recently been enjoined to ‘celebrate’ ten years of devolution. The most trenchant comments I read – though, admittedly, I avoided most of them – came from Ron Davies. He pointed out that a fundamental shortcoming of devolution was that it had failed to raise wages in Wales against UK and EC levels; in fact, after ten years of devolution we’ve fallen even further behind!

If we are ever to catch up we need well paid jobs: for that we need a better educated and more highly skilled workforce; we need indigenous entrepreneurs; we must have our own financial sector. All the Assembly offers us is low pay, no skill, seasonal employment. With these clowns in charge it’s only a matter of time before the ‘third world country’ jokes become reality.

By Jack of the North

Share
 

According to a story in the Western Mail taken up by Miss Wagstaff blog, buried deep in the massed ranks of jobsworthies in the Department for Economy and Trmoleratansport of the Wales Assembly Government exists a whistleblower/mole who is bravely telling all about the WAG’s performance – he lists a series of alleged shortcomings, claiming they illustrate how the Department for Economy and Transport is letting Wales down, and which include:

  • Recent Ministerial refusal to meaningfully engage with the UK Government on stimulating bank lending to Wales’s businesses in favour of WAG lending of public money direct to business;
  • hundreds of millions of pounds of European aid being diverted from the private sector into the continuation of longstanding, re-branded public sector schemes with poor track records;
  • the much-trumpeted Single Investment Fund and WAG’s SME (small and medium enterprises) relationship manager support is only reaching a minuscule number of Welsh businesses;
  • millions of pounds of funding intended for SMEs not being used and handed back;
  • an expensive IT project to develop a customer relationship management system not delivering;
  • major problems with the public transport concessionary fares scheme;
  • ministers’ decision to reject connecting with the highly praised Business Link and Direct Gov websites, helping millions of individuals and businesses elsewhere in the UK, on the grounds that they are “too English” and would make the millions of pounds invested in WAG’s site look embarrassing;
  • expensive staff events continuing at some of Wales’ best hotels regardless of the recession, and
  • the department’s staff having the least faith in senior management, according to staff survey results.

The witch hunt  is on. This will make the Christopher Glamorgan story pale into insignificance.  Cambria Politico is willing to give the WAG space for a point by point rebuttal of all the allegations since there is no way that the ‘mole/whistleblower’ can be right -  can he/she??

Surely the Mole cannot be right that Convergence Funding has been diverted into public sector projects?

Surely the Mole cannot be right that millions of pounds allocated to business support through the Single Investment Fund in a recession is not reaching those for whom it is intended?

Surely the Mole cannot be right that relationship managers are not having meaningful relations with businesses?

Surely the Mole cannot be right that EU funds are being handed back unspent?

Surely the Mole cannot be right that a cock up has been made of  expensive IT projects?

We await the publication of WAGs rebuttal with bated breath or rather we won’t be holding our breath. Can the WAG at least come up with a list of businesses that have been supported in a way that wasn’t available before the recession through the usual channels?

This is a matter of public interest. Publication of case studies, success stories  and examples  would allow the WAG to rebut these (probably Tory initiated) allegations. We would be only too happy to post these success stories. No-one wants stories and rumours about the Welsh economy to be mole-driven. These rats must be driven out into the open and exposed for all to see that, in fact, the WAG  and its dedicated staff in the Department for Economy and Transport is doing ahem … a great job.

Hat tip- Miss Wagstaff

Update: Much vaunted ProACT scheme not applicable to businesses like JCB in Wrexham. JCB said it had examined the scheme and had not applied because the wage subsidies are only paid for employees in training. Prof.Dylan-Jones Evans says that training support has been available under other schemes for years. So what is new?

Share
 

I have been following with interest the continuing saga of the proposed Ceredigion Coastal Path and the extremely costly legal fight put up by Mr Lyn Jenkins of Cardigan Island Coastal Farm Park against the joint might of Ceredigion County Council and the Wales Assembly Government – a sort of modern day David versus Goliath.

Cardigan island farmIn the High Court case of Jenkins versus WAG, the Judge Justice Curran said that no coastal path’s outside edge should be closer than two metres to the cliff edge for essential safety purposes. There are numerous locations where the costal path of West Wales is closer than that to the edge of a cliff (including the newly dedicated path on Mr Jenkins’ farm).

This has opened a whole can of worms. It is of serious concern for the safety of path walkers. It is of very serious concern to the residents of West Wales who as Council Taxpayers may have to pay compensation to those killed and injured in falls from such dangerous paths when the claims for damages and compensation come into their Council. More importantly it is an outright moral disgrace how Ceredigion Council (and now WAG) have relentlessly sought to pursue, harass and destroy Mr Jenkins’ livelihood to create a new path that is breaching serious safety issues.

I’m told that none of the Ceredigion Councillors ever visited the proposed path site nor have they been since. If there are now deaths, then they will have blood on their hands and should be individually surcharged by the families who seek compensation.

It is also of note that elsewhere in the UK, that Coastal Paths are diverted around sensitive business areas like Port Meirion; Tintagel Castle; Penclacwydd and National Trust grounds and Ministry of Defence areas. Many of these diversions are purely to safe guard existing Tourist ventures. Cardigan Island Farm Park brings in a lot of revenue to Cardigan. Many of its thousands of visitors also visit the town and spend money there. We do on our visits from Swansea. We buy food drink and petrol and sometimes gifts in your town when we visit, which is often as we keep a Caravan in West Wales.

Can Cardigan afford to destroy Mr Jenkins’ business spin offs or is it some jealous hate campaign your Councillors are running to destroy one successful local businessman who has dared to criticise them?

Ioan M. Richard, Craigcefnparc, Swansea.

Share
 

Anti-Welsh Liebourites such as Piggy Andrews and others have recently been jumping on the bandwagon to gainsay the troubled economies of small independent nations in a pathetic attempt to cover up the devastating problems of a genuinely failing state: the good old UK.

LieBour troughersTheir argument runs something like this: These troubled times prove that Wales is far better off under the protective wings of Westminster rather than going it alone as an independent nation. Just look at small independent nations like Iceland and Ireland – they’re going bust. Isn’t it just great, especially when just a year ago these uppity little countries had GDPs which put that of the UK to shame? Well now they’re on the road to ruin, while we, under Gordon Brown’s world-saving helmsmanship are deadheading towards an early recovery. The green shoots just lurking there under the surface ready to spring to life.

Piffle and balderdash.

As Lieghton and his chums well know, Brown and Liebour’s mismanagement of the current economic crisis has saddled every man, women and child in Britain with a debt in excess of £35,000. The UK’s manufacturing base has been shot to bits; public spending (Liebour’s euphemism for electoral bribery) has reached unprecedented levels, and the whole flimsy structure is about to split apart against a backdrop of mounting public anger, a police force running out of control, and dangerous, unpopular and prohibitively costly overseas adventures to which the UK’s poorly equipped armed forces have been committed.

No wonder the Scots are asking themselves whether they want to be part of this basket case arrangement. So should we. Urgently.

Despite the grim reality of the situation charismatic Rhondda AM and “Minister for Regeneration” (!) Piggy Andrews seems happy to continue bamboozling his long-suffering constituents with a mishmash of downright twaddle and hogwash in his local organ. This is what he wrote in last week’s offering:

“They (Plaid Cymru) want to cut Wales off from the rest of Britain.

They threaten jobs coming to Wales.

Over recent years they have said that Wales should be an independent country, like Iceland.

Well, we know what has happened to Iceland in the current global economic crisis.

It is bankrupt.

An independent Wales would be bankrupt very quickly, cut off from UK and international investment.”

If, like me, you can’t honestly believe that Piggy is completely devoid of intelligent thought, then he’s got to be spouting this stuff for nefarious reasons.

The whole idea of independence is to give Wales the prosperity and economic security it lacks as part of the United Kingdom, because union with England (and the boom-and-bust policies of successive Liebour and Tory governments) has turned Wales into one of the poorest parts of the EU. The whole idea of independence is to attract inward investment into Wales, because it can’t get it under the present arrangement. The whole idea of independence is to ensure job creation in Wales and to prevent the current drain of talent as young people are forced out of the country to find work. The whole idea of independence is to put Wales at the heart of Europe with a direct voice at Europe’s decision-making top table rather than seeing it represented by dodgy second-hand car salesmen from Essex. What on earth would be the point of championing it if it wasn’t?

It’s precisely because those who get the point realise that small independent nations like Iceland and Ireland have the ability to control their own affairs – for good or ill. Iceland may be bankrupt, but this is NOT because it is independent, but because it had bad leadership and bad fiscal management in a global financial crisis.

Britain is bankrupt for the same reason.

Ireland, on the other hand – another example Liebourites use to warn of the ‘dangers’ of independence – is regularly disparaged in the British press with gleeful headlines such as “Roar goes out of Celtic Tiger” and “Celtic Crown loses Gleam” with accompanying pictures of half-drowned cats, drink-sodden leprechauns and the like, is, actually proof that small nations have a better chance than large ones. Well, better, certainly, than the poor old UK.

In an article (‘Celtic Tiger sharpens its claws for recovery’) in last week’s Financial Times, BP chairman and former EU commissioner Peter Sutherland describes Ireland’s problems as being ‘acute rather than chronic’. The article is worth quoting at length because it clearly shows the unfathomable chasm between the incisive analysis of a brilliant international economist on the one hand, and the bizarre ramblings of a puffed-up buffoon from the backbenches of Wales’s toothless Assembly on the other.

“The reasons for the deficit are well known,” writes Sutherland, “Ireland’s growth and tax revenues, from about 2003, became overly dependent on housing. So, when the property bubble burst, the economy slowed sharply and tax revenues plummeted. The problems of the Irish banks are related to this issue too (their exposure to US mortgage-backed securities and other non-domestic toxic assets is minimal).

While the housing slowdown and the associated budget deficit has created a major challenge, to focus exclusively on housing-related problems provides a distorted picture of the under lying health of the Irish economy. The economy has been a phenomenon since the late 1980s. From a relatively poor country on Europe’s periphery, Ireland has risen to become one of the richest economies in the world in 20 years. Even after an anticipated 8 per cent fall this year, its GDP per capita, in terms of purchasing power, will remain significantly higher than that of the UK or Germany. And, while unemployment has risen, there are still 80 per cent more jobs in Ireland today than 15 years ago. Much of its infrastructure has been transformed during this period.

Since 2007, Ireland’s current account position has been rising and, at the current trajectory, it should return to surplus by the year end. To the extent that Irish public sector borrowing has been rising, this is being more than offset by a rise in private sector saving.

The cause of these favourable statistics is export-led growth, led by inward investment in industries such as information technology, pharmaceuticals and private sector services. The fact that Ireland’s economic success has been driven by exports in these areas has resulted in a far stronger basic Irish economy than the one that existed in the 1980s. Because of the nature of these exports the drop in exports anticipated for this year, as a result of recession, is estimated to be only 5.9 per cent. The corresponding Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development figure for Germany is 16.5 per cent, France 11.4 per cent and Great Britain 9.8 per cent. Some others are considerably worse, such as Japan, forecast at 26.4 per cent.

Another issue on which there has been much comment is the alleged disadvantage to Ireland of being in the eurozone. In reality, Ireland may have been saved by its membership from the possibility of a run on its currency – however unwarranted such a run would have been. The UK, meanwhile, has seen its currency fall by 30 per cent against the euro and this is likely to bring short-run benefits. This option is not, of course, available to Ireland; flexibility has had to come instead from an adjustment in real wages. But – and this is the most important positive for Ireland’s long-term prospects – there is clear evidence that it is dealing with the competitiveness issue in a sustainable manner and one I believe to be unprecedented in the OECD area.

The latest data suggest there has already been an 8 per cent drop in private sector wages and salaries and, via the “pension levy”, there has also been in effect a 7-8 per cent fall in public sector pay. It is hard to imagine wages in other economies displaying such flexibility. If these figures are maintained or even supplemented, the Irish economy should emerge from the recession in a highly competitive position. Meanwhile, the minister of finance has given an undertaking to maintain Ireland’s low corporation tax rate of 12.5 per cent.

It has to be recognised that Ireland has a very open economy.

Ireland’s problems are acute in nature rather than chronic. Once Ireland overcomes this short-term panic – and I believe that last week’s budget, whatever its alleged deficiencies, was a vital step in this process – the basic strengths of the Irish economy remain formidable. If the Irish people continue to react constructively to the harsh measures necessary, Ireland will be in a very strong position to benefit from the eventual global recovery and its healthy demographic profile will greatly help in this.”

Piggy and his cronies need to wise up. Yes, we all know that the recession is global; but it will be small nations like Ireland who will see the first green shoots of recovery rather than Britain’s benighted wasteland.


by Cuneglas

Share
 

snouts in the troughWe at Cambria Politico predicted last year that the ‘credit crunch’ would result in EU Convergence Funds being  ‘subsumed’  or diverted into  public sector coffers and never see the light of day in the real Welsh economy where it is urgently needed and where it was intended to be delivered. The following article by Wyn Pryce illustrates how this was done to Objective One funding and is being done now to Convergence Funds.

—————————————————

For many years the West Wales Business Initiative (WWBI) has expressed concerns about the economic policies of the Welsh Assembly, the size of the Public Sector in Wales and the consequent imbalance of the Welsh economy.

We have argued that the Assembly Government has channeled UK and EC resource into a rapidly growing Public Sector in Wales to the detriment of the private sector. Throughout the “so-called” good years of 1999-2007, when UK GDP rose significantly, the private business sector in Wales has declined. The opportunity to rebalance the Welsh economy was missed.

We have warned several times in submissions to Ministers and Civil Servants of the outcome of these mis-directed strategies. As scarce resources have been poured into the public sector so there was less for the private sector.

In the words of Welsh economist Ted Nevin in his Textbook of Economic Analysis, “Scarcity is the foundation of Economics”. Resources are scarce and have to be competed for. There is also the Opportunity Cost: the alternative use of resource. If you do one thing, you cannot do another. Whatever that may be. You cannot do, or have everything. Therefore, there is a choice. The Assembly has chosen to divert resource into the public sector. The majority of this into wages. 71% of the total Welsh economy is now dependent on the public sector.

Some commentators have stated that the public sector is now greater in Wales than in Russia in the 70′s or China in the 80′s. Therefore something has had to give. At the moment Wales is the “basket case” of the UK. Continue reading »

Share

Cambria Books

New publication.
Important contribution to our knowledge of the Arab Spring by Denis Campbell.

Cambria Books

New publication. Entertaining guide to the US Elections by Denis Campbell.
© 2011 CAMBRIA POLITICO Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha