The opening scene…
A Frank Lloyd Wright designed house perched on a rocky cliff overlooking the ocean where a wild storm is raging. A white middle-aged man is sitting in a recliner watching the US election results from  Fox News on his 50 inch flat screen HD TV which when not on is recessed behind an original painting by Claude Monet depicting something impressionistic with lilies and a wooden bridge. On his lap is a white long haired cat with almond shaped eyes the colour of emeralds and wearing a diamond studded collar. Beside him on the coffee table is a cut glass tumbler and a bottle of Kentucky Old Rip Van Winkle Special Family Reserve bourbon and a half smoked Cohiba Esplendidos Cuban cigar.

Also on the table is a leather-bound hardback first edition of Atlas Shrugged open at the fly leaf which displays the scrawled authorial signature of the High Priestess herself. On the TV, is a man whose recent ancestors would have been slaving in cotton fields or tending to animals and whose most important item on his agenda, in a time of apocalyptic economic melt down, appears to be the choice of  a non-allergenic puppy to crap on the immaculate White House lawn. There is no expression on the man’s face as the results are announced. Still without emotion, he drains the glass of fine whiskey, picks up the antique Colt 45 lying waiting next to the now empty bottle and … well, you can guess the rest. CSI to you too.

You cannot understand John McCain and why he made the decisions and choices he made during the US Presidential election, such as the choice of Sarah Palin and his actions on the economic situation, unless you have read the novels of the neo-Con High Priestess, Ayn Rand. Both McCain and Palin are archetypal Ayn Rand characters which is probably why the neo-Con ‘men in grey’, Cheney and Rove, chose them in the first place. McCain and Palin are tragic figures taken straight from the pages of ‘Atlas Shrugged’ – the defining Gospel of the objectivist neo-conservatives.

Reading Atlas Shrugged, you begin to understand the venom and contempt with which ‘socialism’ and socialist ideals are viewed by Republicans and those that follow Ayn Rand’s ideas of objectivism and ‘selfishness is good’. To call Obama Barack a socialist is one of the very worst insults that a neo-con can throw without being liable to legal proceedings. The main thesis, and a very attractive one it is to certain types of rich white American men and women (WASPs) who need to assuage vague feelings of guilt about being wealthy and being ‘masters of the Universe’, is that…’what is good for me must also be good for the rest of mankind’. A concept famously  encapsulated by Michael Douglas in the movie, Wall Street by stating… “Greed is Good!”

Another defining characteristic of an Ayn Rand character is the struggle and the sacrifice (and eroticism) that must be gone through in order to live up to Rand’s ideals and which leads to the ultimate vindication of objectivism and denial of socialism. However, unfortunately for the Republicans, McCain is no John Galt and Palin is no Dagny Taggart.

The election of Barack Obama represents a change in the Zeitgeist. Even if he did absolutely nothing except walk the new puppy on the White House lawn for four years he would still be a seminal figure in history. If he was to be assassinated he would be elevated in the American consciousness to the level of a God (like JFK). His job is essentially done. The real job of managing the economic and militaristic ambitions of the US will now fall on the Democratic Congress and government.

The Republican Party and neo-conservativism appears to have suffered a fatal blow … but have they?

Fast forwarding to the end of the movie...
We see President Obama standing still as a heron looking out of the window of the newly decorated Oval Office. On the desk made from the timbers of an ancient sunken warship dating from the Civil War, lies a well thumbed paperback book – the Fountainhead.
Howard Roark lives on!

Share
 

Just as the Climate Change debate is over whether Global Warming is man made or part of a natural cycle, so the political conversation is about whether we are in control over our politics or is it being shaped by global forces of change. God, Man or Chaos Theory.

Political dogma is fragmenting as a consequence of changes in people’s perception of government due to the Media and the Internet. There are no simple questions and answers these days with persuasive and bullying opinion being raised on every conceivable issue. Why is this? Is it because we are in the pre-ordained End of Days as foretold by religions or is it due to changes in our psychology?

Carl Jung, in his explorations of the nature of religion and human psychology, was one of the first to postulate the existence of ‘group minds’ or group (un)consciousnesses. He considered that there were four group psychologies (mindsets) that were roughly geographically based on continents ie. the Western, Eastern, African and possibly Aboriginal. We can now extend this theory to propose a new and different pan geographical and global group consciousness – the Internet. This Internet consciousness has a very loose and undetermined shape at the moment but it has all the classic characteristics of a group mind as explored and prefigured in science and fantasy fiction (cf. Tad Williams). It is a  vast tag cloud of information, music, video clips, imagery, blogs, comment threads and random thoughts difficult to define and wholly unregimented.

Or is it? Just like the oceans, there are patterns and currents to this seemingly vast sea of infojunk. I find it is is sometimes useful to employ artistic analogies/visualisations to help with this concept.  For example, even the UK government’s Dept of Trade and Industry has drawn from the imagination of the graphic artist M.C. Escher to try and get a handle on this in its publications of the role of the Internet in commerce. This new mind is constrained not by geographical and traditional societal boundaries but by access and technology and human psychology  so this is the key to understanding how to use it. The politicians that can understand this fully and utilise it predictively , will be the powerful men and women of the future. Barack Obama and his campaign team exemplifies this new understanding.

These group minds are peculiarly susceptible to music (melody patterns). The Beatles were a music phenomenon which unconsciously gave expression to changes in the (Western) group mind. We find it very difficult to comprehend these days why the Beatles simple lyrics and melodies were so popular but it can be understood if explained in terms of being in tune or resonating with an unconscious mind. at a particular time in its evolution. It’s the vibes Man! Similarly today, it is no accident that music drives a large part of the Internet and is a powerful medium for disseminating music both old and new.

Peer to peer systems, the stock markets, blogging and the social networking phenomenon are manifestations of the new consciousness. These ‘viral channels’ are a kind of nervous system or ocean current and look how fast they react.

Politically, the important questions of today are how do the traditional mind sets of the West interact, use or merge with this new mindset. How does a politician locked into old ways of doing things – knocking on doors, holding surgeries, attending conferences, dealing in smoke filled rooms, troughing in pork barrels approach what is now a new paradigm? The politician of the present now needs to understand how the Internet works, not the techie bits, but the psychology of it. It’s not about issues but about surfing the wave breaks of the group mind  – being in tune with the Internet  and other  group (un)consciousness. In Wales, most of the politicians are ‘old school’, and have little or no understanding of the Internet or its political and marketing tools.  Well, except maybe for  Chris ‘Pants’ Bryant! Some, like Peter Black and Adam Price are starting to use blogging as a means of communicating (mainly to political anoraks) but most only have their staff monitor blogs or news websites for stories that might be attacking them.

The political and economic climate is set to change and change fast. It is clear that none of our current crop of politician either here in Wales or the UK is ‘ahead of the curve’. In the US, Barack Obama is probably the closest. McLuhan was partially right. The Medium is now the Message is now the Mindset.

There will be much Tribulation.

Share

Cambria Books

New publication. Important contribution to our knowledge of the Arab Spring by Denis Campbell.
© 2011 CAMBRIA POLITICO Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha