DESPITE ALL the problems both they and the country is facing, a pledge was made in the coalition briefing that local councils will NOT be forced to merge, Clive Betts writes from the Assembly press gallery.

Instead, any changes must originate with the local area, said local government minister Brian Gibbons.

He said YES to the on-going merger of Powys county council with Powys Local Health Board, but NO to any forced merger between the successful Gwynedd and the unsuccessful Ynys Mon counties.

The sort of top-down mergers of councils which successive governments are so happy about introducting were ruled out by Dr Gibbons.

In the past, the Assembly government has not been so strident in ruling out such activities. Some Welsh councils are considered to be rather small – certainly, compared with those in England.

Those which have been mentioned include Ynys Mon – much hit by a very long period of internal strife – Merthyr, and Blaenau Gwent.

At one point, Cardiff seemed to be merely waiting for time to give them the courage to institute mergers.

The sort of mergers Dr Gibbons is thinking about are radically different. He talks of “back offices” – meaning, I suppose, pay, personnel, etc.

Dr Gibbons also spoke about adjoining councils merging individual services, with the stronger council in that service taking the lead.

This is something like the system which existed sometimes before the mid-60s mergers which abolished tiny urban and rural district councils. In those days, chief officers would be shared between councils – although, admittedly, the departments concerned were often quite minor.

The political view over mergers varies. Kirsty Williams, Lib Dem leader and Brecon and Radnor AM, was a bit surprising in her open support during her party’s briefing for a merger that would encompass the currently-planned county and LHB, and then add on the Brecon Beacons National Park.

Ms Williams worried about the cost of providing services over such a large area to so few people.

But then she is too young to have any experience of the mass of urban and rural councils which existed within the three old counties of the present Powys.

After all, that system DID work !

Share
 

IT WAS like old days when local government minister Brian Gibbons stood up to talk to the press about the amount of money he is giving local councils next year, writes Clive Betts from the Assembly press gallery.

True, there was a press handout. Dr Gibbons gave us the guts of what it contained.

But far more interesting and attractive was his presentation of a re-run of what an Assembly subject committee used to be like under the regime which existed up until the last election.

Dr Gibbons gave us the facts, he followed up with the political “spin”, and then he rested back and fielded the questions from the press, some of them hostile.

It was as if he were responding to the questions from the AMs of other parties on the committee. Of course, he was keen to ensure that his own view got over.

But what was the crucial difference between today’s briefing and what we generally receive from the weekly government press conference ? Was it that in the front row were sat three of the most senior officials from the minister’s department ?

On occasion, they were brought in to help the minister give an answer.

More important, their presence ensured that Dr Gibbons knew that he was not just speaking to the press; he was also addressing his officials. His answers were therefore that much more authoritative.

As everyone present could also answer back, the comments were thus far more valuable than the answers given in the Assembly itself. In the chamber, a strict protocol has to be followed by questioner  which owes far too much to the “Mother of Parliaments” and far too little to the obtaining of information.

This is, of course, aside from the issue of how good the settlement is considered this time by local authorities. According to Dr Gibbons, the settlement is a good one.

“This settlement is significantly above current and projected levels of inflation,” he said.

But Kirsty Williams, the Lib Dem leader and AM for Brecon and Radnor had a different view half an hour later. Her local authority – Powys – gets one of the worst settlements of all. So, as you would expect, she differs from Dr Gibbons on how good the settlement is.

An extremely significant concession by the minister will see NO CAPPING of council tax this year.

To do so would go contrary to local government democracy, he said.

His reaction was very different from that of previous ministers. For instance, Sue Essex, a former senior local councillor herself, who knows all about local government democracy, was quite willing to impose capping on council tax when she was minister. She has now retired from the Assembly.

Dr Gibbons did not entirely reject a cap. But he made it quite clear that he was not thinking along those lines. He knew the sort of council tax figure that local authorities were considering; they all seemed quite fair.

However, if anyone did think of ascending towards the stratosphere ….

Share
 

A slap on the wrist for local government minister Brian Gibbons from his senior, the minister for finance and public service delivery Andrew Davies.

There has been quite a lot of quiet talk for some time that 22 councils is too many for Wales – some are too small, such as Merthyr, with only 56,000 people, and that is before you factor in the competencies resulting from the resultant difficulty in attracting good officers.

Dr Gibbons told a BBC show that numbers of councils could be cut if targets were not met within the next four years. Bearing in mind the time needed to affect changes, that almost amounts to the minister drawing out an executioner’s sword and telling the prisoner to start walking towards the block.

Questioned about the effect of such talk on the stability of the system, Mr Davies strongly emphasised “reform” – such as councils working together, changing the culture so that the needs of customers (ie, us) predominates over the interests of the providers (ie, the councils and their workers). “To talk about local government reorganisation is premature.”

.

He curtly finished, “Reorganisation does not automatically improve things,” It is true that the last reorganisation in 1996 can be said to have been bungled; it had been planned a few years before by the Welsh Office, and some of the ministers concerned seemed more concerned with establishing as many unitary authorities as possible rather than with how effective they would be.

That explains how there was much talk of Meirionnydd and Llanelli continuing in existence. For Meirionnydd to have survived would have been farcical. But debate about the far more viable Llanelli seemed to have choked off by local Labour interests who seemed far more interested in using the tin town’s voting power to seize control of Carmarthenshire in its entirety.

But talk so far recently has been of getting the system to work better, and placing heavy pressure on areas of partial-failure. A reorganisation would amount to failure by the centre, and ensure local chaos for almost a decade.

Share

Cambria Books

New publication.
Important contribution to our knowledge of the Arab Spring by Denis Campbell.

Cambria Books

New publication. Entertaining guide to the US Elections by Denis Campbell.
© 2011 CAMBRIA POLITICO Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha