EVERYONE IS talking nowadays about coalitions, and Welsh Lib Dem leader Kirsty Williams seems to reckons she has learnt more about creating them than most politicians, writes Clive Betts from the Assembly press gallery.
“I have no intention of getting into the same situation as last time,” said Ms Williams as she discussed how this novelty- except in Wales, Scotland and, of course, the once-British Ireland – of our governmental system should be dealt with.
The issue has arisen, of course, because of political readings which say Westminster will produce a hung Parliament after this summer’s election.
“Last time” for Kirsty was immediately following the last Assembly poll, when the Welsh Lib Dems careered off in the opposite direction to that favoured by the party’s then-leader, Mike German.
New arrangements will have to be adopted for the future, Ms Williams is saying now. After all, coalitions will almost certainly be the norm in Welsh politics for quite some time – until some other party than Labour achieve the dominance that Labour is currently losing.
Ms Williams seems to be thinking of upgrading the role of both the party leader – currently, of course, herself – and of the party group.
Perhaps, it was mused to her at her party’s weekly press briefing, the next party conference in the autumn is the time to achieve that. Presumably, by changing the constitution.
But the leader’s comment was not nearly so clear-cut. She spoke, instead, of a “better understanding” between the leader and the party’s grassroots.
But what in reality does that mean ? An understanding which ends in another misunderstanding, perhaps ?
Kirsty ended up – “The party will get better at dealing with the situation,” she commented. Actually, she tried to make that seem a blunt statement with which no-one can disagree.
Which, unfortunately, it wasn’t.







