Huw and Edwina soon to goTHE TREMENDOUS result which saw Carwyn Jones easily returned as leader of the Assembly Labour Party group  – but not, I believe, as leader of the party in Wales; that job goes to a Scotsman – should lead to a period of peace with that party, writes Clive Betts from the Assembly press gallery.

Mr Jones’s ability to win a PR vote without the need for a single recount sends the bluntest message possible to the entire Welsh party.

If I were Mrs Hart, a former president of the National Union of Banking Employees, perhaps I’d start looking for a job with Lloyds Bank.

And why, the day after the result, did her agent Andrew Davies announce he was standing down from the Assembly in 2011. His excuse was that he wanted a more rounded personal life.

If that’s shorthand for a woman, make sure there’s mutual respect between you for each other’s achievements.

Another possible reason is that he doesn’t fancy a lot of time in opposition. Particularly as fixing deals with the opposition was his raison d’etre when he served as business minister under the Alun Michael minority administration.

Although he was a former party full-timer in Transport House, he was broad-minded enough to realise that there was much that was good in the other parties.

He was also one of those in the Labour Party who was not afraid of the press. That party often has dreadful difficulties handling the press – very similar to Plaid Cymru. Although in complete contradistinction to both the Lib Dems and the Tories.

I can recall two of us journalists once having a deep political discussion with Andrew late one evening on Cardiff Central station – he on the Swansea platform, and we some way away on the Valleys platforms. Goodness knows who else was listening.

Perhaps one of the reasons for his decision is that the size of Carwyn’s win means that the new First Minister is truly his own man in what he does about the shape of his cabinet. You can be sure there will be a lovely job for Rhondda AM (and former Lib Dem) Leighton Andrews.

But what about the Gower AM ? Mrs Hart didn’t do herself many favours in her conceding speech; too much about herself. And it is her own personality which is her weak (or, as some would say, her strong) point.

As to Huw Lewis, he presumably realises that the size of his vote indicates that he is in danger of emulating the Communist Party of GB in votes terms. Of course, they had good ideas to the very end, which they continued to believe in. But politics and life had passed them by. Ditto Huw. And that’s without living in Penarth.

Interesting to note that Huw’s younger son – who must be aged around six – was present at the official declaration at the Millennium Centre, with eyes and ears all awake, sitting next to mother Lynne Neagle, the AM for Torfaen.  There sat certainly the next generation of Labour activism in Wales.

Whether Huw will get anywhere under Carwyn, I know not. Let it be remembered, however, that Huw’s first ministerial resignation was aimed in Carwyn, over the disposal of foot-and-mouth carcases.

Huw was criticised in full plenary at the time by a fellow Labour AM for his entire mishandling of the issue. His attacking of a minister (Carwyn) should have been handled entirely differently. He should not have based his line on his own personal feelings, but on the feelings of his constituents … which he felt obliged to pass on to the minister.

It’s difficult to see Carwyn finding any post for such an individual in his cabinet. After all, the second resignation was over the formation of the Labour-Plaid coalition, which Carwyn now has to keep in existence.

Share
 

Edwina HartTHE SECOND-RUNNER for the post of First Minister came under sharp attack at the Assembly press briefings, writes Clive Betts from the Assembly press gallery.

Edwina Hart is usually reckoned to be trailing Carwyn Jones.

Opposition politicians have normally kept their mouths shut about the strengths and weaknesses of the trio bidding to replace Rhodri Morgan as leader of the Labour group in the Assembly – and thus as First Minister of the coalition government.

But for not the first but the second time, Lib Dem leader Kirsty Williams has decided to start taking Mrs Hart, the health minister, apart.

The Gower AM had earlier come under severe criticism from sections within her party – and also from the North – about the presumptuousness of some of her proposals and/or decisions.

Mrs Hart takes some pride in her decisiveness. Thank goodness something happens under her stewardship, many people will say.

But Ms Williams takes a slightly different tack. She focuses on those areas where nothing happens in Mrs Hart’s department.

Last week it was the £50m which the department has failed to spend.

This week it was about a linked series of official reports – including one from the Wales Audit Office – on the health department’s failure to maintain key mental health services for children.

Perhaps Ms Williams and her fellow-speaker Peter Black (South West) went a touch overboard in their criticisms of the minister.

But what is more important is that space was left by the administration for the criticisms to be made, and that the minister had little to say in response. Carwyn Jones, leader of the house told plenary that no government could be expected to respond in full to every report containing criticisms that was published.

Indeed. But a report from the Audit Office is a bit different to most other reports that are produced by the Assembly and its linked organisations.

Another leading Lib Dem said yesterday that the success of Elin Jones as agriculture minister was that no-one had heard anything about her ministry recently. In other words, the minister was so much on top of her job that nothing was being allowed to go wrong.

On that basis, Mrs Hart isn’t doing too well. Which SHOULD carry a message for those voting in the current party Labour Party leadership battle.

Share
 

Kirsty WilliamsKIRSTY WILLIAMS seems willing to risk martyrdom, writes Clive Betts from the Assembly press gallery.

The Lib Dem leader launched a cutting attack on the size of the health budget, its wastefulness and suggested the need for cuts.

Normally, health spending is absolutely sacrosanct for politicians. The only issue is how to find some more money; never how to cut the existing budget.

Much of the blame was placed by the Brecon and Radnor AM at the foot of health minister Edwina Hart – which sparked the query from a member of the press whether, if she couldn’t run her own department, how could be run the entire government as leader of the Labour group and hence first minister.

Ms Williams declined to comment on that point.

But her attack on Mrs Hart certainly raised questions about the minister’s competence.

It is not that Mrs Hart doesn’t make decisions. But that she rushes into them, without perhaps considering issues carefully enough.

Ms Williams claimed that that the health budget is spent very inefficiently; that about £50bn remains unallocated of this year’s budget. When asked in committee about that unallocated money, Mrs Hart had the gall to ask members whether they had any ideas of how it should be spent, according to the Lib Dem leader.

There’s also the big issue of cash savings from the massive reorganisation carried out last month, with number of NHS organisations reduced from around 37 to about 10.

Ms Williams said that no figure exists for expected savings. Perhaps that it because the rushed change was pushed through on the back of a no-redundancies agreement. How many senior officials are now sitting around doing nothing, but still getting paid, she asked.

Hence the Lib Dem demand for the NHS to face a need to meet during the coming financial year of efficiency savings which are 0.4 per cent higher than faced by other departments.

In return, the under-pressure further and higher-education sector would be given a better deal during the coming year.  We certainly hear quite a few moans from FE and HE – not only from the Lib Dems passing on their pleadings, but direct from the sectors themselves. But both sectors are quite well organised for public relations.

I admit I am surprised at the Lib Dem willingness to attack the health budget. The only reason I can see them getting away with it is that the health minister is not the most popular of characters politically.

Which says something about who should become the new Labour leader …

Share
 

I WAS told this by a Tory AM, so I can’t vouch for it myself, writes Clive Betts from the Assembly press gallery.

As we know, Edwina Hart is not the world’s leader at personal relationships.

The Western Mail carried a piece saying that Carl Sargeant had decided to give his backing to Carwyn Jones, Counsel General and AM for Bridgend, because he was the only of the three contestants who had approached Carl for his support.

I was speaking to the Tory about Edwina’s weakness over personal relationships.

Which was when I was told that Carl and Edwina had been seen in close chat in the Assembly coffee shop.

The Tory thought this had been in response to the piece in the Western Mail.

Edwina possesses some good support among the ranks of non-labourites. They see her as extremely competent, extremely frank, and extremely keen to make the right impression over decisions.

Labour possesses an extremely complicated voting procedure – with three voting stages – to chose the new leader. Which means no-one knows beforehand who will win.

But opposition parties give Edwina a very strong chance. Possibly ahead of front-runner Carwyn

We shall see. Decision day is December 1.

Share
 

Even the formidable health minister Edwina Hart admitted she was surprised by some of the secretive ways of working that her civil servants operate.

Mrs Hart had launched a massive consultation operation over the future of the NHS, suggesting that she would abolish the local health boards and make various other changes.

Over 800 submissions quickly submerged her desk on the fifth floor at Ty Hywel. She read them all, she told us. After her initial decision in mid-July to merge trusts and LHBs into eight regional bodies providing most NHS services, she said she would spend the summer holidays reading some responses again to help her decide what sort of national board to set up.

Lib Dem health spokesman Jenny Randerson asked why these responses hadn’t been published – no doubt, she fancied reading them…. so she could advise the minister. Mrs Hart replied that her intention had been to publish – “I had envisaged that, as the responses came in, they would automatically go on the website, but apparently that is not how it is done.”

She found out that permission had to be sought from each respondee.

I am glad that point was news to the minister. It was also news to me.

For it contradicts what had seemed to be official Welsh policy. The general consultation website states clearly, “We will publish a summary of the responses we receive, or the responses themselves.  If you want your comments to be anonymous, you will need to tell us.”



Continue reading »

Share
 

We all know the Western Mail (otherwise Llais y Sais) is losing readers, and that their reporters sometimes can’t find stories (after all, it is still the “silly season“).

But today’s effort on the future leadership of the Welsh Labour Party in the wake of Rhodri Morgan is peculiarly off-centre.

So peculiarly off-centre that it’s worth examining, for what might be behind it.

Examine first the author. Martin Shipton, chief reporter (never political reporter, although that is where his interest lies) hardly knows the Assembly, apart from over a phone line.

Although a Welshman, he spent some years in north east England, has been close to Labour up there, and sometimes displays the anti-regional assembly bias that seems to have been a bit too common within Labour in both that region and this.

When not much news is around, reporters will often be exceptionally receptive to the musings of their senior colleagues. If that colleague is Mail editor Alan Edmunds, a musing rapidly becomes a story – the pair have been extremely close ever since Edmunds headed Wales on Sunday, and Shipton was his political man. Continue reading »

Share
 

Wales is in grave danger of being considered a nation of narrow-minded hypocrites in the wake of the Rev Rhodri Glyn Thomas being forced to resign as culture minister after mistakenly walking into a Bay public house with a cigar in his hand .

Apparently, the resignation followed a tete-a-tete on his future with party leader Ieuan Wyn Jones.

Yet it could all be for a future good – which could propel Plaid Cymru towards the Assembly stratosphere, and Labour towards the exit almost everywhere in Wales.

Mr Jones often seems buttoned up, sometimes even the first minister’s poodle, as if he’s keeping an ear open only for what emanates from the fifth floor Ty Hywel room occupied by the FM overlooking the Pierhead building.

But I feel the DFM is much wider awake to the world than he seems.

The minister’s son must know a bit about sin (when performed by others); the former solicitor should know about the importance of keeping away from the clutches of the hypocrites-in-chief who run certain London newspapers; while the political leader should have been asking himself whether his selected minister was handing far too many votes to the Conservative and Liberal Democrat opposition through his decisions and opinions on the (now-vanished) Welsh language daily paper.

In other words, the Rev Min was ruining his own future. And it was no help that he was doing so in an arrogant fashion – possibly in a worse way than even health minister Edwina Hart.

The cigar was a quickly-corrected mistake; the misread literary prize-winner was because of vanity (refusing to wear glasses); and the arrogance a human failing.

But the possible eventual interest of certain newspapers is a different matter – London hypocrites of that type, we know, always exaggerate beyond truth, so it’s far better not to attract their attention.

This is where – rather ironically – we reach another world…that of the future of Plaid Cymru.


Continue reading »

Share
 

 Ann Jones, normally a fairly amelioratory character, is spitting blood over health issues in the North. Words such as “ridiculous” are ejected with venom against a decision by her own party’s health minister Edwina Hart.

Unfortunately, the disagreements by Mrs Jones, AM for Vale of Clwyd, combine with the weak devolution beliefs of some Labour AMs to produce a toxic brew that will no doubt cause trouble for the Yes campaign when it comes to mount a referendum for Scottish-style powers.

The issue came to a head over the past practice of patients from the North being sent to hospitals in Liverpool for routine treatment of heart complaints. As part of a gradual restructuring of the fiendishly-complicated NHS operative and financial regimes, Mrs Hart is trying to build up centres of excellence in Wales. Unfortunately, for heart-surgery (the big problem in the North, where patients are accostomed to being referred to Liverpool and Manchester), they are in the South.

Simon Thomas, senior adviser to Plaid leader Ieuan Wyn Jones, pointed out to me that the series of issues that have to be dealt with includes the “fiendishly high” charges that hospitals in England make for treating Welsh patients.

Mrs Jones’s weak-devolution beliefs had already been expressed in her attempt to delay the onset of the smoking ban in Wales from April 2 last year to the July date adopted in England. That (failed) bid was launched jointly with Karen Sinclair (Clwyd South), another devolution sceptic.

Now, I hear that Mrs Jones’s bile is reaching written form. She has completed a pamphlet for the Wales 20:20 devo-sceptic group run by fellow-sceptic, Merthyr and Rhymney AM Huw Lewis.

“It’s the next one,” Mrs Jones told me, “unless someone else beats me to it !” Now, with all respect to Ann, there can’t be that amount of competition. I’m sure she’s just winding me up.

And, in any case, there’s another way to look at the problems which exist between Wales and England over who pays for treating NHS patients, and how much. The short piece in The Independent yesterday was written in the context that Bristol hospitals seem at blame in refusing to accept patients from Wales.

But that is hardly the argument that a Welsh devo-sceptic would want to hear.

Share

Cambria Books

New publication. Important contribution to our knowledge of the Arab Spring by Denis Campbell.
© 2011 CAMBRIA POLITICO Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha