Peter HainUnbelievable but we are being foisted with both Peter Hain and Glenys Kinnock yet again.

Guido Fawkes was the first political blogger to have a go at Peter Hain and here is his reaction below

Hain is we are told heading back to the Welsh Office.  Is it because of his brilliance?  When Gordon sacked him last time it was for incompetence.
Is it because he is clean when it comes to his expenses and will demonstrate the sincerity of Brown’s plans to clean up politics?  This is the man who failed to declare £100,000 laundered through a think tank / slush fund for his deputy leadership campaign.  Hain, do not forget, was the cabinet minister who argued for the change in the system that allowed ministers to designate their London home as their second home, he “employs” his 80 year-old mother at the taxpayer’s expense to look after his interests, such a shame she never actually visits his office…

Diolch i chi  Gordon Brown.


Share
 

Kinnocks carbon footprintNews that the Anglesey Fishwife’s carbon footprint is greater than almost all other 785 members of the European Parliament was revealed in today’s The Sunday Times (Globetrotting MEPs scramble aboard gravy train¹ by Jason Allardyce and Jon Ungoed-Thomas). It’s precisely what we suspected, and very much in tune with what Cambriapolitico has been saying about Glenys Kinnock¹s consistent and long-term abuse of her position as one of the elected European representatives for Wales.

Who gives a fig about the Welsh unemployed…

In all her years as an MEP, not once, it appears, has La Kinnocchia performed a single service in Brussels or Strasbourg on behalf of her electorate, preferring instead to concentrate on the needs of the people of Africa, and jet around the world at our expense on meaningless “fact-finding” junkets to exotic and interesting parts of the world. Places, you can be sure, with a good deal more sunshine than either Anglesey or Bedwellty (of which hubby Neil is now ‘baron’). Now this is not to say that the issue of the interests of the people of Africa shouldn’t be raised in the European Parliament, but since Kinnock was ostensibly elected to represent the people of Wales – one of the poorest and most deprived parts of the mighty EU – her electors might have expected a tad more for their votes, and indeed, their hard-earned money? Surely there are MEPs from relatively prosperous regions of Europe who might well have the time and the spare cash to champion the cause of Africa? No, it’s left to our Glen, despite the desperate state into which her lamentable party has led our little country. She’s got the time, the cash and the attitude. Sod the beleaguered farmers and the woebegone unemployed of Wales.

Fishwife Glen: FIVE TIMES round the world at our expense!

According to the ST, Kinnock is the ‘best travelled’ of all 78 UK MEPs, and has covered a staggering 127,465 miles on behalf of the Welsh electorate – ‘equivalent to flying round the world more than five times’! As part of her work for the farmers of Ceredigion, the steel-workers of Neath and Port Talbot and the unemployed of just about everywhere else in our little country, the Fishwife has been on delegations to the Seychelles (“Welcome to Another World”), Barbados (“Wake up to the rhythm of the tropics and paradise to explore.”) and Namibia (“Never fails to enthral its visitors….still poets do not tire to invent attributes to do justice to its unique, ever-varying magnificence.”)
Yes, yes, we get the picture. But we should be very angry.

Wales needs proper representation in Brussels as never before

Mercifully, the Fishwife and her ghastly handmaiden and sidekick Eluned Morgan are standing down as MEPs, (their only Welsh initiative in Brussels, incidentally, has been to pour scorn on the Welsh language in a revolting exhibition of BNP-style xenophobia) but when Welsh voters put their crosses to their ballot papers this week, they should think very carefully about giving a carte blanche to any representative of any party other than a Welsh one. Jill Evans has served Wales loyally and royally since 1999. Bear that in mind on June 4th. Wales desperately needs proper representation in Brussels as never before. It has been appallingly betrayed by the Fishwife and her flighty coven of freeloaders.



Share
 

Time to call time on Wales’s Westminster freeloaders

If ever there was a need to get rid of an ‘extra, expensive and useless tier of government’ (the old chestnut once much loved by critics of the National Assembly) it is now. And the tier that should be in our sights is that which consists of Wales’s 40 Members of Parliament and some 48 Members of the House of Lords.

In the light of the unfolding constitutional cataclysm which has broken over a benighted Westminster, and which has revealed a veritable rats’ nest of, in varying degrees and combinations, incompetence, profligacy and downright criminality, why not let’s get rid of the lot of them – and run our own affairs.

Quite apart from Liebour’s costly – in terms of wasted resources and young lives – and winless wars, quite apart from the idiocy of maintaining Trident as a ‘unilateral deterrent’ (which isn’t unilateral at all) and the construction of vast new aircraft carriers (to defend what against whom exactly?), when Britain has a national debt now hitting almost incomprehensible trillions of pounds, Welsh taxpayers have to shoulder the phenomenal cost of subsidising a largely useless gang of gravy-trainers zipping up and down from London to Wales in Great Western’s First Class coaches enjoying a more than a few doubles-and-mixers on the way. Time to call time.

Here are the facts. An MP’s basic salary is £64,000, – ‘Spudface’, Wayne ‘Smacked Backside’ David, Chris ‘Y-front’ Bryant and others serving either as members of the Cabinet or holding junior ministerial posts rack up a whole lot more, including ministerial residences, chauffeur-driven limousines, personal staffs, expenses etc. In addition MP’s get a second home allowance of £20,000, and an expenses allowance to cover the cost of offices, staff, researchers etc – which is, in reality often abused with MPs employing family members and hangers-on. If we take a broad average these come to somewhere in the region of £150,000 per MP, which amounts to an average of £250,000 per MP per annum and, with 40 Welsh MPs, that’s a staggering £10,000,000 shouldered by you and I. And for what?

If you reckon that £10,000,000 good value for money, study the records of the vast majority of these politico’s, especially in the light of The Daily Telegraph’s revelations, and think again. Add to this figure the Welsh taxpayer’s share of the maintenance of the Palace of Westminster with its antediluvian rituals and rigmarole, the subsidised food and wine in Westminster’s many bars and restaurants. Add the attendance allowance*, expenses, perks and backhanders (that’s lobbying fees to you and me)** of Welsh members of the House of Lords and the figure rapidly doubles, if not trebles. All this before we ask ourselves what these people actually do for us. Oh and ponder awhile on Baron Kinnock of Bedwellty in starched linen bib-and-tucker dining on the finest foie gras and agreeable claret – all of which you are paying for – and remind yourself what you and your family are having for supper. Ponder also if you will, on the Orange Lounge-lizard’s chameleon-like makeover – which you and I have generously granted him: new home, new wife…and new shed roof! We’d all like at least two of those, wouldn’t we, but they’re probably a little beyond our reach in these difficult times.

Wales now has a democratically elected representative body in our capital city. It is called The National Assembly. It’s been there for ten years. It works – but it could work better with full law-making powers, and, better still, sovereignty. Why on earth do we need another body anywhere else? Why pay twice for democracy?

A vast majority of the issues raised by individual constituents can be handled in Cardiff, and a great number of these are actually duplicated by MPs and AMs at even greater cost – and waste. We are in a deepening recession. Britain isn’t working.

The drive for independence – the drive for sanity – must start now. Time to say ‘Enough is enough, you are no longer fit for purpose.’

* Their noble lord and ladyships can claim a £150 per day attendance allowance, £75 per day subsistence allowance (that’s the foie gras and claret), and £65 per day office costs. In addition there are generous UK – and European – travelling expenses, an annual secretarial allowance of around £5,000 per year, and free postage.

** Earlier this month two Liebour peers, Lords Truscott and Taylor, were dismissed from the House of Lords for taking bribes disguised as ‘lobbying fees’.

Share
 

Loony TunesA Labour MP has denied using a second home allowance for London to furnish her first home in south Wales.

Bridgend MP Madeleine Moon has been accused in the Daily Telegraph of claiming more than £4,000 in expenses for furniture bought in Wales.

Here is her response:

The insinuation of the Daily Telegraph that I have bought and retained goods using my Parliamentary allowance to furnish my home in Wales is unfounded. Before making purchases I have always contacted the Department of Finance and Administration to confirm that I was acting within the rules.

I bought the majority of my goods in Wales, during the summer recess of 2005 in places like Crazy Macs and Dunelm Mills in Swansea, Ikea in Cardiff and Curry’s in Bridgend. These and additional furniture from my family home were transported to London by a local furniture and haulage contractor once contracts on the flat had been exchanged. The Telegraph has a copy of the receipts confirming this.

I have bought the majority of my household goods in Wales where I knew I would have value for money and would bring money into the Welsh economy.

I fully support the publication of all receipts and the operation of clear guidelines for the spending of public money.

Madeleine Moon MP
Bridgend

Make of it as you will. Peter Hain has a house in Bridgend, doesn’t he?

Share
 

ballotIn the run up to the European and General Elections, Cambria Politico will be publishing occasional articles and opinion pieces about the reasons to vote FOR a particular political party. A great deal has been written about the negative  ‘attack dog’  role of political blogs and, without giving up on our campaigns against corruption and loss of liberty, we want to provide a more balanced positive commentary.

We will be taking each party in turn and finding one good reason to vote for them, starting with NuLiebour oops! Labour. We will also be scoring them against appropriate parameters to put them in a historical and societal context.

Finding a good reason to vote FOR Labour at the present moment is difficult. However, the Labour Party/Movement has an honourable history, has accomplished many fine things, and has produced figures and personalities of international renown and historical significance.  It has a proud and valued record of  social and political achievements.

labourtideBut that was then and this is now. Labour is now psychologically and socialogically an irrelevance. It has washed out on the tide of political thinking. In Monty Python terms, it is a Dead Parrot or on a par with the People’s Front of Judea or is it Judean People’s Front?

So where is the FOR reason to vote for them?

The brilliant  SF author John Brunner, wrote a famous novel  published in 1965 entitled ‘The Squares of the City’ (ISBN 0-345-27739-2). It is a sociological story of urban class warfare and political intrigue, taking place in the fictional South American capital city of Vados. It explores the idea of subliminal messages as political tools, and it is notable for having the structure of the famous 1892 chess game between Wilhelm Steinitz and Mikhail Chigorin. In this story, society is ‘managed’ using city planning techniques. There are no actual villains and heroes it is mainly  an exploration of how people can be controlled using bulldozers, urban planning  and surveillance. The grim and powerful result is a true nightmare foreshadowing present and possible future conditions in Britain.

So how does this relate to a positive vote for Labour? Brunner, Orwell and other writers, like the late J.G.Ballard, tell us that a truly ‘efficient’ and well organised government is the greatest threat to freedom and human liberties of thought. So a vote for  a useless, chaotic, bumbling, directionless government with real identifiable  ‘faces’ attached to it is a vote for liberty and freedom from faceless efficient supra national oppression. Labour is classically inept and disorganised and thus truly worthy of your vote.

Forget the lies, the minor expenses corruption, the broken manifesto committments, Labour is infinitely preferable to a Brunner, Orwellian, Kafka-esque world of super efficient civil service and control by ‘faceless’ bureaucratic elites exemplified by the frightening Kinnockian European ideal.

Political X Factor Scoring

PARAMETER SCORE (out of 10)
Leadership 1
Grassroots Organisation 5
History 9
Corruption 2
X Factor / Charisma 1
Planet Earth Reality 2
Future Potential 0
Policies 8
Personalities 3
Financial Competence 1
Magic 0
Internet Awareness 2
Governmental Competence 4
Media Savvy 5

TIDE OF HISTORY : AGAINST

Selected quotes:

“[This Labour government] is the most mendacious, dishonest, endemically corrupt, power-hungry, incompetent, illiberal f**king shower of shits that has ruled this country…”—Devil’s Kitchen

Times’ David Aaronovitch – similar wavelength?

Share
 

Oliver CromwellOliver Cromwell’s famous speech dismissing the Rump Parliament 20 April 1653.

It is high time for me to put an end to your sitting in this place, which you have dishonored by your contempt of all virtue, and defiled by your practice of every vice; ye are a factious crew, and enemies to all good government; ye are a pack of mercenary wretches, and would like Esau sell your country for a mess of pottage, and like Judas betray your God for a few pieces of money.

Is there a single virtue now remaining amongst you?

Is there one vice you do not possess? Ye have no more religion than my horse; gold is your God; which of you have not barter’d your conscience for bribes?

Is there a man amongst you that has the least care for the good of the Commonwealth?

Ye sordid prostitutes have you not defil’d this sacred place, and turn’d the Lord’s temple into a den of thieves, by your immoral principles and wicked practices? Ye are grown intolerably odious to the whole nation; you were deputed here by the people to get grievances redress’d, are yourselves gone!

So! Take away that shining bauble there, and lock up the doors. In the name of God, go!

MP’s and AM’s should take note.  History is repeating itself. No lessons have been learned. Clichés are becoming Truisms.

Hat tip: a commentator on Guido Fawkes.

Share
 

snouts in the troughWe at Cambria Politico predicted last year that the ‘credit crunch’ would result in EU Convergence Funds being  ‘subsumed’  or diverted into  public sector coffers and never see the light of day in the real Welsh economy where it is urgently needed and where it was intended to be delivered. The following article by Wyn Pryce illustrates how this was done to Objective One funding and is being done now to Convergence Funds.

—————————————————

For many years the West Wales Business Initiative (WWBI) has expressed concerns about the economic policies of the Welsh Assembly, the size of the Public Sector in Wales and the consequent imbalance of the Welsh economy.

We have argued that the Assembly Government has channeled UK and EC resource into a rapidly growing Public Sector in Wales to the detriment of the private sector. Throughout the “so-called” good years of 1999-2007, when UK GDP rose significantly, the private business sector in Wales has declined. The opportunity to rebalance the Welsh economy was missed.

We have warned several times in submissions to Ministers and Civil Servants of the outcome of these mis-directed strategies. As scarce resources have been poured into the public sector so there was less for the private sector.

In the words of Welsh economist Ted Nevin in his Textbook of Economic Analysis, “Scarcity is the foundation of Economics”. Resources are scarce and have to be competed for. There is also the Opportunity Cost: the alternative use of resource. If you do one thing, you cannot do another. Whatever that may be. You cannot do, or have everything. Therefore, there is a choice. The Assembly has chosen to divert resource into the public sector. The majority of this into wages. 71% of the total Welsh economy is now dependent on the public sector.

Some commentators have stated that the public sector is now greater in Wales than in Russia in the 70′s or China in the 80′s. Therefore something has had to give. At the moment Wales is the “basket case” of the UK. Continue reading »

Share
 

So we, the taxpayers, paid £10,000 to have Mr.Blair’s kitchen refurbished and for Mr.Oaten to have a new bed (too much information).  MP’s  (and of course AM’s iPods as well) expenses are a perennial issue that crops up again and again.

It’s not so much the amounts (we paid £6,500 for the now defunct MFI to do our kitchen) that are involved than the principles or rather lack of  them that grates. As the campaigner of Unlock Democracy Paul Facey has said below:

Unlock Democracy director Paul Facey said so far protests against the proposed FOI exemption had been largely restricted to what he termed “the civil liberties fraternity”.

But he was confident many ordinary voters would join the campaign, thanks to the power of the internet.

Mr Facey added: “I challenge senior MPs and leaders of all political parties to say where they stand and oppose this idea.

“The politicians must realise that by behaving so cynically, they will cause great damage to the reputation of Parliament.”

Source BBC

The reputation of our politicians is critical to a stable society. Without a political class seen to be ‘more or less’ representing the people and not ripping them off by having their ‘noses in the trough’, then all bets are off on widespread civil disobedience. Examples have been set.

Like a three legged stool, there are three pillars that hold society aloft : the financial system, the political system and the police/judiciary. If even one of these legs crumbles then the stool of society falls over. Throughout history politicians have had variable morals but the parliamentary system has contained them. There are clear worrying signs that Parliament is under attack and the normal checks and balances eroded.  The Labour government has alot to answer for.

Share