PLENTY OF doubts among the press as the Assembly resumes after its half-term break about Plaids strategy for its Westminster election campaign, writes Clive Betts from the Assembly press gallery.
What a great way to gain votes, by campaigning for a hung parliament, party leader Ieuan Wyn Jones argues. Although some of the press add an exclamation mark, in surprise.
Interestingly, that strategy is the precise opposite of that being followed by Kirsty Williams and the Lib Dems.
KIrsty had to put up with a bit of semi-barracking during her press briefing from journalists who demanded to know with which party her party would link after the election due shortly.
Her line was simple. Our aim is to get as many MPs elected as possible. In Wales, that means to hold the current three, and to add Swansea West and Newport East.
As for a post-election coalition, that issue rests “in the hands of the people” – in other words, in where they put their votes.
Behind that line lies the statement that a crucial issue in deciding which way the Lib Dems should swing is the movement in how the votes are cast. In other words, the numbers of MPs elected for each party could fail to reflect the trend of voters’ intentions; and this the Lib Dems might not go the “obvious” way.
Kirsty then reflected on the problems which followed the last Welsh general election. At that time, careful discussions led to the negotiation of a Plaid – Conservative – Lib Dem coalition.
Until, that is, Lib Dem leaders met in Llandrindod. That conflab was lobbied by a demonstration, with Kirsty and Lembit Opik (MP for Montgomery) dominant, urging that the agreement be thrown out. Which it was.
This was to the absolute fury of the party’s sensible wing, prominent among them Mike German and Jenny Randerson – both, of course, former ministers in a previous coalition, and expecting, with good reason, similar jobs in the next.
Kirsty’s reflection this week on those happenings was most revealing. She said, “We didn’t cover ourselves in glory.” Indeed, indeed, as the Sensible Wing said afterwards.
Ieuan’s position in those Assembly plans was, of course, that he would have become First Minister.
Ieuan’s current argument in favour of a coalition at Westminster (or “hung parliament”, as he would have it) is that his party would avoid a coalition, but use its votes in support of the “best” policies for Wales – in particular, the extension of powers to the Assembly to rectify the current incomprehensible cat’s cradle that Cardiff is saddled with.







