THE FUTURE of Montgomery constituency is one that greatly concerns Lib Dem leader Kirsty Williams, writes Clive Betts from the Assembly press gallery.

But Ms Williams’s hopes of gaining it back at the next poll – or next but one, supposing we see a repeat Westminster election within a short span, which now seems unlikely – seem unrealistic.

The loss of his seat seems to have been as much a surprise to the controversial sky-watcher Lembit Opik as well as to the winner, ex-AM Glyn Davies.

The holding-party, the Lib Dems, seem to have harboured no inkling that the worst was about to befall them.

Similarly the Tories failed to play up beforehand – although they mentioned it – the possibility of winning the seat.

However Glyn Davies, their candidate, seems a bit disingenuous to claim – as he seems to have done – that he had no victory speech prepared, which perhaps gives the idea that winning was somehow not on the realistic horizon.

The truth, of course, is that those with exceedingly long memories will recall that the constituency was retained for the Liberals for so long – probably for decades – purely because an official deal being reached by the constituency committees of each party.

The Conservatives would stand down and tell their supporters to vote for the Liberal. Shades indeed of what Nick Clegg finally delivered for what remains of the United Kingdom.

Precisely what the Liberal used to offer the Tories for that old agreement to stand down never got as far as the public prints.

But the understanding by both parties was that a large pool of similarly-minded voters – mainly, I suppose, small hill-farmers and their associates – was involved.

While makes Ms Williams’s expectation that the seat will return to the fold at the next election somewhat difficult to understand.

The party leader points to the significance of a clash between two big “personalities”. She adds she is convinced that Montgomery “is a Lib Dem seat at heart”.

She reminds us that the seat fell once before to the Tories – at the 1979 Thatcher landslide – but that it swiftly returned.

Ms Williams had to be told by the press that that earlier Tory was an entirely different kettle of fish from Mr Davies.

This week’s winner is a solid Montgomeryshire farmer – even though he some strange stories attached to his name, such as that which features himself driving a lorry while wearing no trousers. As Mr Davies tells the story against himself, you can be pretty sure that the tale doesn’t also feature anything like any of Mr Lembit’s numerous girlfriends.

No hint of a bra-strap, possibly, lying over the next seat … That would be hardly Glyn.

In contrast, the “kettle of fish” who previously held the seat for the Cons seemed a really fishy character, a bit smelly and a real “con-man” rather than a Con.

The stretch of time over which Delwyn Williams held the seat resulted in a steady stream of lurid headlines – plus several stories which were run by broadcasters but reckoned too stupid ever to make the printed page – which made his downfall entirely expected, as well as unlamented.

It was to that sort of background that the seat “went home” to the Lib Dems, to Alex Carlile.

It is true that the new winner Glyn Davies occasionally manages to contradict himself politically, but the thoughts he commits to his lengthy blog mark him out as a good-class thinker, with his heart deeply involved in the rural areas.

Much as I dislike saying it, I think Kirsty is going to be disappointed in her expectation that Montgomery will “come back to the fold”.

Share
 

EVERYONE IS talking nowadays about coalitions, and Welsh Lib Dem leader Kirsty Williams seems to reckons she has learnt more about creating them than most politicians, writes Clive Betts from the Assembly press gallery.

“I have no intention of getting into the same situation as last time,” said Ms Williams as she discussed how this novelty- except in Wales, Scotland and, of course, the once-British Ireland – of our governmental system  should be dealt with.

The issue has arisen, of course, because of political readings which say Westminster will produce a hung Parliament after this summer’s election.

“Last time” for Kirsty was immediately following the last Assembly poll, when the Welsh Lib Dems careered off in the opposite direction to that favoured by the party’s then-leader, Mike German.

New arrangements will have to be adopted for the future, Ms Williams is saying now. After all, coalitions will almost certainly be the norm in Welsh politics for quite some time – until some other party than Labour achieve the dominance that Labour is currently losing.

Ms Williams seems to be thinking of upgrading the role of both the party leader – currently, of course, herself – and of the party group.

Perhaps, it was mused to her at her party’s weekly press briefing, the next party conference in the autumn is the time to achieve that. Presumably, by changing the constitution.

But the leader’s comment was not nearly so clear-cut. She spoke, instead, of a “better understanding” between the leader and the party’s grassroots.

But what in reality does that mean ? An understanding which ends in another misunderstanding, perhaps ?

Kirsty ended up – “The party will get better at dealing with the situation,” she commented. Actually, she tried to make that seem a blunt statement with which no-one can disagree.

Which, unfortunately, it wasn’t.

Share
 

PLENTY OF doubts among the press as the Assembly resumes after its half-term break about Plaids strategy for its Westminster election  campaign, writes Clive Betts from the Assembly press gallery.

What a great way to gain votes, by campaigning for a hung parliament, party leader Ieuan Wyn Jones argues. Although some of the press add an exclamation mark, in surprise.

Interestingly, that strategy is the precise opposite of that being followed by Kirsty Williams and the Lib Dems.

KIrsty had to put up with a bit of semi-barracking during her press briefing from journalists who demanded to know with which party her party would link after the election due shortly.

Her line was simple. Our aim is to get as many MPs elected as possible. In Wales, that means to hold the current three, and to add Swansea West and Newport East.

As for a post-election coalition, that issue rests “in the hands of the people” – in other words, in where they put their votes.

Behind that line lies the statement that a crucial issue in deciding which way the Lib Dems should swing is the movement in how the votes are cast.  In other words, the numbers of MPs elected for each party could fail to reflect the trend of voters’ intentions; and this the Lib Dems might not go the “obvious” way.

Kirsty then reflected on the problems which followed the last Welsh general election. At that time, careful discussions led to the negotiation of a Plaid – Conservative – Lib Dem coalition.

Until, that is, Lib Dem leaders met in Llandrindod. That conflab was lobbied by a demonstration, with Kirsty and Lembit Opik (MP for Montgomery) dominant, urging that the agreement be thrown out. Which it was.

This was to the absolute fury of the party’s sensible wing, prominent among them Mike German and Jenny Randerson – both, of course, former ministers in a previous coalition, and expecting, with good reason, similar jobs in the next.

Kirsty’s reflection this week on those happenings was most revealing. She said, “We didn’t cover ourselves in glory.”  Indeed, indeed, as the Sensible Wing said afterwards.

Ieuan’s position in those Assembly plans was, of course, that he would have become First Minister.

Ieuan’s current argument in favour of a coalition at Westminster (or “hung parliament”, as he would have it) is that his party would avoid a coalition, but use its votes in support of the “best” policies for Wales – in particular, the extension of powers to the Assembly to rectify the current incomprehensible cat’s cradle that Cardiff is saddled with.

Share
 

THE LIB Dems seem terrified that the expected referendum on extra powers for the Assembly will be lost unless a unified Yes campaign is able to concentrate fully on that issue and not be distracted by an election, writes Clive Betts from the Assembly press gallery.

The party has indeed been concerned for some time that the Labour Party’s unwillingness to commence organising at the earlier time possible – ie, some time ago – an all-party Yes campaign will lead to a referendum defeat.

That was the line continually spun by the Welsh LD party’s previous leader, Mike German.

Now we have a variation on that tune. This time it comes from Peter Black, the party’s AM for South West – and voice for present leader Kirsty Williams in the land of hard-spun policy.

Mr Black was playing hard-ball at his party’s weekly press briefing. If the coalition parties, Labour and Plaid, did not give assurances that the dates of the referendum and the 2011 election were not separated, the LDs would refused to vote for the trigger-motion that would enable the referendum to go ahead.

Few journalists believed that the LDs would, in fact, stick to their guns when the time for next week’s vote arrives. The party are just too pro-devolution.

It’s true that it seems likely that the LDs would be willing to accept a weaker form of promise on this issue than would the Tories – who are taking a very similar line.

Speaking to the press, Mr Black was very convincing on why the referendum had to be split from the election. Basically, an election is the time when parties maximise their differences with every other party.

It’s hardly the sort of time when your campaigners would either want to – or be capable of – start talking about how much they agree with aspects of another party’s policies,

But then another issue has perhaps to be brought into the reckoning.  This is the issue of who in fact wrecked the planned rainbow coalition alliance between Plaid, the Conservatives and the Lib Dems immediately after the last Welsh general election in 2007.

The Western Mail reported that former Plaid parliamentary candidate Sian Caiach, of Llanelli, stated in her letter resigning from the party that one of the reasons she was quitting was because the party had turned their back on the rainbow alliance.

The party had decided to link with Labour because, she claimed, senior figures in Plaid were unwilling to see Ieuan Wyn Jones become First Minister.

Now, that’s a very, very interesting story. And there could well be a lot of truth in it.

Except for the fact that the rainbow deal collapsed because the Lib Dems walked out – to the not-inconsiderable fury of the party’s two former ministers in the coalition they had once run with Labour – Mike German and Jenny Randerson.

After the Lib Dems had done the dirty, a deal with Labour was all that was left for Plaid to enter into.  For some reason the Western Mail didn’t tell us that.

Perhaps that was because they couldn’t remember. Or the reporter couldn’t find the file of the story in the paper’s library. Or because the paper didn’t even have an Assembly reporter at the time.

But why did the Lib Dems walk out ?

Because of a demonstration outside a meeting of the Lib Dem’s Welsh executive being held in Llandrindod.

The demo was in opposition to the planned rainbow coalition.

I don’t think we ever discovered the precise reason. But it was said at the time that the basic reason behind it was opposition by some prominent Brecon and Radnor Lib Dems to any close link with the Tories.

The reason for that was purely local constituency concerns about the contest with the Tories at subsequent elections. In other words, local concerns killed national policy.

The local Lib Dem AM is of course Kirsty Williams. She has indignantly denied allegations from inside her party that she was a driving force in that demo.

In any case, she is now facing her first big national test.

Which may be why she – in the form of Peter Black – is threatening to act so strongly against both the election and the referendum being on the same day.

Share
 

I REALLY must question the strategy being used by the Liberal Democrats in their weekly press briefing, writes Clive Betts from the Assembly press gallery.

Whether she likes it or not, it’s time for party leader Kirsty Williams to give way on occasion to the person she beat in the contest for the leadership, Jenny Randerson.

This week was one of those occasions – and not perhaps the first. Mrs Randerson had a superb point to make about the costliness of the North-South air link, which would have made headlines.

While all that Mrs Williams could present was a very vague press release which I’m sure no-one was really interested in. And, to make matters worse, the AM for Brecon and Radnor regaled us with a mother-in-law joke which was really not in the best marital taste.

In other words, as has been said before, Kirsty Williams isn’t starting well in her new post as leader of the Welsh Lib Dems.

Indeed, some wonder whether Mrs Williams is slowly going nuts.

She will not like the comment, but the press gallery is slowly getting the impression that she is a very poor replacement for Mike German as leader of the Lib Dem group.

This week’s press release was a demand that new First Minister Carwyn Jones “matches rhetoric with action” over his commitments to education.

Mrs Williams demanded that he reverse the higher education spending cuts which his government had implemented last autumn. She wanted a supplementary budget passed.

Now, precious few politicians are going to do an about-turn that quickly, particularly when it so obviously a financial issue.

So, that story wasn’t much of a runner.

Then Kirsty had some good points about the failure of child-poverty to be reduced in Wales in accord with the Assembly’s written policies.

Her solution ? Carwyn should have a chat with Gordon in London about changes to taxes and benefits.

Somehow, I don’t think that would be worth it.

But what makes me think that Kirsty is going nuts is what passed for her mother-in-law joke. She asked the press gallery to guess what he mother-in-law had given her for Christmas.

Some of them even tried. But Kirsty put them out of their agony.

The present was a roll of cling-film and a cling-film dispenser. What for ? So that Kirsty could better prepare her sandwiches for her daily trip down to Cardiff Bay.

If I were Kirsty’s mother-in-law I would take hold of that cling-film and slowly wrap it around Kirsty’s neck, before pulling it tight.  Not too tight, mind you; we don’t want a by-election.

Not for the first time, the following days revealed that other Lib Dems AMs had material prepared which more than justified an airing at the Lib Dem briefing.

Mrs Randerson, the heavy-weight AM for Cardiff Central, demanded of Carwyn Jones, “The continued subsidy of air-travel by the Welsh Government shows just how out of touch they are with the economic and environmental reality Wales faces. In year one, Welsh taxpayers subsidised each plane passenger using the service by £84, whilst the subsidy for rail travel between North and South Wales was just £6.30 per passenger.

“It cannot be right that Welsh taxpayers continue to subsidise costly and heavily polluting air-travel, while our railways and public transport remains desperately underfunded. The Welsh Liberal Democrats would switch the air-link subsidy to be spent on improving the vital and more heavily used North-South train service.”

Under the regulations which govern FM questions, I believe that Mr Jones was given notice that he was going to be quizzed on the Valley link.

The link was proving much more popular than expected. It had “exeeded expectations”.

But, due to the way the Assembly is now run, that is all we got. The old-style transport committee could have demanded – and would indeed have received, without any need to demand – full reports from civil servants on what was happening, on the rules, and so on.

But now, next to nothing.

Quite clearly, Mrs Randerson had a far better tale to tell than had Mrs Williams. For once, Kirsty should have given way.

Share
 

Carwyn Jones CARWYN JONES has often been accused of being lazy, writes Clive Betts from the Assembly press gallery.

Those of us who have known him for a long time wonder whether that accusation is entirely fair.

And now  Lib Dem leader and farmer’s wife Kirsty Williams  pointed out that there are TWO Carwyn Joneses.

There is the agriculture minister who was hurled into the job the day before the Royal Welsh Show opened in Builth

Not long after that, the foot-and-mouth crisis descended on Wales. That involved the burning and burial of immense numbers of animal carcases.

This period of high feelings saw the minister rushing across Wales dealing with crises left, right and centre. In the heights of the Brecon Beacons, it also saw a driverless tractor hurtling down towards him … why or how we have never been told.

Ms Williams said the farming industry had noticed the two different Carwyns. The first was lively and energetic. That individual lasted for about two years.

But then things slipped back. That was when people started describing him as lazy.

Ms Williams wondered whether the change came about when Mr Jones got fed up with being stuck in the same specialised ministry. At each cabinet reshuffle – and, to be fair, there haven’t been many – or possibility of a reshuffle, he ended up in the same post.

The Lib Dem leader’s view fits in with the line that Mr Jones mentioned to me once when I was still on the Western Mail – prior to the five years when the “national newspaper of Wales” had NO reporter based at the Assembly.

He told me and the Daily Post reporter that he was getting fed up with the job because there was so little to do. Of course, Mr Jones’s father was not a farmer – which would have meant she had been inbred with the minutiae of agricultural officialdom – but an official for an educational professional association.

Ms Williams also agreed that the serious illness his wife Lisa had suffered – now overcome – may have had an effect on his work attitude.

Ms Williams hopes that her feelings about Mr Jones’s attitude to his job – his current post of Counsel General is also almost a non-post – will be borne out when he takes on the party leadership, and the post of First Minister which goes with it.

The new challenge will, she hopes, reinvigorate him to become like the agriculture minister he was at the beginning.

God help us otherwise, was her attitude.

Share
 

Kirsty WilliamsKIRSTY WILLIAMS seems willing to risk martyrdom, writes Clive Betts from the Assembly press gallery.

The Lib Dem leader launched a cutting attack on the size of the health budget, its wastefulness and suggested the need for cuts.

Normally, health spending is absolutely sacrosanct for politicians. The only issue is how to find some more money; never how to cut the existing budget.

Much of the blame was placed by the Brecon and Radnor AM at the foot of health minister Edwina Hart – which sparked the query from a member of the press whether, if she couldn’t run her own department, how could be run the entire government as leader of the Labour group and hence first minister.

Ms Williams declined to comment on that point.

But her attack on Mrs Hart certainly raised questions about the minister’s competence.

It is not that Mrs Hart doesn’t make decisions. But that she rushes into them, without perhaps considering issues carefully enough.

Ms Williams claimed that that the health budget is spent very inefficiently; that about £50bn remains unallocated of this year’s budget. When asked in committee about that unallocated money, Mrs Hart had the gall to ask members whether they had any ideas of how it should be spent, according to the Lib Dem leader.

There’s also the big issue of cash savings from the massive reorganisation carried out last month, with number of NHS organisations reduced from around 37 to about 10.

Ms Williams said that no figure exists for expected savings. Perhaps that it because the rushed change was pushed through on the back of a no-redundancies agreement. How many senior officials are now sitting around doing nothing, but still getting paid, she asked.

Hence the Lib Dem demand for the NHS to face a need to meet during the coming financial year of efficiency savings which are 0.4 per cent higher than faced by other departments.

In return, the under-pressure further and higher-education sector would be given a better deal during the coming year.  We certainly hear quite a few moans from FE and HE – not only from the Lib Dems passing on their pleadings, but direct from the sectors themselves. But both sectors are quite well organised for public relations.

I admit I am surprised at the Lib Dem willingness to attack the health budget. The only reason I can see them getting away with it is that the health minister is not the most popular of characters politically.

Which says something about who should become the new Labour leader …

Share
 

DESPITE ALL the problems both they and the country is facing, a pledge was made in the coalition briefing that local councils will NOT be forced to merge, Clive Betts writes from the Assembly press gallery.

Instead, any changes must originate with the local area, said local government minister Brian Gibbons.

He said YES to the on-going merger of Powys county council with Powys Local Health Board, but NO to any forced merger between the successful Gwynedd and the unsuccessful Ynys Mon counties.

The sort of top-down mergers of councils which successive governments are so happy about introducting were ruled out by Dr Gibbons.

In the past, the Assembly government has not been so strident in ruling out such activities. Some Welsh councils are considered to be rather small – certainly, compared with those in England.

Those which have been mentioned include Ynys Mon – much hit by a very long period of internal strife – Merthyr, and Blaenau Gwent.

At one point, Cardiff seemed to be merely waiting for time to give them the courage to institute mergers.

The sort of mergers Dr Gibbons is thinking about are radically different. He talks of “back offices” – meaning, I suppose, pay, personnel, etc.

Dr Gibbons also spoke about adjoining councils merging individual services, with the stronger council in that service taking the lead.

This is something like the system which existed sometimes before the mid-60s mergers which abolished tiny urban and rural district councils. In those days, chief officers would be shared between councils – although, admittedly, the departments concerned were often quite minor.

The political view over mergers varies. Kirsty Williams, Lib Dem leader and Brecon and Radnor AM, was a bit surprising in her open support during her party’s briefing for a merger that would encompass the currently-planned county and LHB, and then add on the Brecon Beacons National Park.

Ms Williams worried about the cost of providing services over such a large area to so few people.

But then she is too young to have any experience of the mass of urban and rural councils which existed within the three old counties of the present Powys.

After all, that system DID work !

Share

Cambria Books

New publication. Important contribution to our knowledge of the Arab Spring by Denis Campbell.
© 2011 CAMBRIA POLITICO Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha