TALK OF the Cardiff government undertaking a sea-change in its industrial policy was somewhat overwhelmed by publication of a report on that most sensitive of subjects – the level of expenses paid in governmental sources, writes Clive Betts from the Assembly press gallery.

Briefly, International Business Wales, the successor to the apparently-successful Welsh Development Agency, paid out far too much in “exes”, particularly to its overseas officials.

We’ve heard of the hundreds of claims for which no paperwork existed.

Really ?

Join the club.

Just like old-style journalistic expenses. Where the exes made up for pay which was significantly below that received by a teacher.

The same as for MPs. Where exes made up for pay increases that were not given

Except, a senior Assembly press officer, hearing me mouthing such comments, said bluntly, “You obviously haven’t read the report.”

Which is true. I’d only heard what those of my colleagues who have were saying.

In fact, the report goes on far beyond exes. It basically points out that the government’s entire policy of attracting overseas investment though international offices had been a failure.

Which is presumably where Ieuan Wyn Jones’s briefing of the Western Mail for Monday’s edition came from.

He knew that journalists were about to write the following day that large unjustified (ie, no backing paperwork) exes were being paid out to officials for a policy that was then failing to deliver.

Clearly, this was a story that could run and run. And in doing so run into the ground Plaid Cymru’s belief that they were doing a good job running one of the biggest government departments.

Cambria was purposefully excluded from the briefing. Which might not be too surprising as we come out only every two months, which compares poorly with the Daily Post and Western Mail.

But Lib Dem leader Kirsty Williams had read the report. And she’s had an official briefing.

Her point when talking to the press was simple. It was obvious that the Welsh Labour-Plaid government is “confused”. While Ieuan Wyn Jones, the economic affairs minister, says one thing, Rhodri Morgan, the first minister and an expert on economics, says the near-opposite.

Ms Williams said, “In a highly complex global market, we cannot afford to send mixed messages to investors.”  She sent on, “To announce there will be no more grants for inward investors is reckless in the extreme. There may well be no more grants, or far less.”

She pointed out that the Minister for Economy and Transport had signalled an end to grant incentives for investors and a new focus on skills.

“But last week Government slashed the post-16 education budget by 5%, cut £7m from business start-up funding, and slashed infrastructure budgets,” said Ms Williams.

“And tomorrow Rhodri Morgan will speaks to UK investors and is billed as outlining the incentives on offer in Wales. These conflicting messages will leave potential investors with little confidence that Welsh Government has a clear strategy. When confidence is low, clarity is vital.”

Now this is only Kirsty’s view of the situation. But no-one has told Cambria anything else – although Plaid had a chance. So, it’s only Kirsty’s view which is given.

Share
 

THE FAUX PAS  by the Assembly Commission with their attempted ditching of a parallel English-Welsh version of the official record of Assembly proceedings rumbles on, writes Clive Betts from the Assembly press gallery.

Both the Tories and Lib Dems are incandescent about the attempt by the Commission to end translation into Welsh of what is said in plenary sessions.

Tory leader Nick Bourne says it sends an appalling message from the Assembly to the outside world – particularly local authorities and businesses.

And Kirsty Williams points out the strongly-challenged decision follows a succession of similar “mistaken rulings” by the commission, for instance over blogging by Assembly staff (mainly by AMs’ assistants) and over aspects of the Roger Jones report on AMs’ expenses.

Mr Bourne was keen to keep his attacks general. The commission, he said, should be the servant, not the master, of AMs.

He pointed out that the commission’s four ordinary members were not delegates of the political parties, although they put forward their views. On the language issue, he quietly admitted later that his party’s member on the commission – William Graham, South East – would no doubt personally be in favour of ending translation into Welsh of everything said in England during plenary sessions.

But it is not Mr Graham who writes the official reports on which commission members then voted. An official proposed that the translation into Welsh (but not, of course, of Welsh into English), be ditched to save money – although the budget is in good enough shape for there to be no need to search for such a saving.

And the chairman of the commission would have had sight of the  report before it was presented to the commission for members to vote on.  Chairman of the commission, of course, is Dafydd Elis Thomas, the presiding officer.

Indeed, a good and activist chairman could have gone as far – after considering the various alternatives – as dictating the line to be taken in the report.

It has been suggested, in defence of Lord Elis-Thomas, that the proposed ditching the translation was made in the expectation that the commission would have to restore it, but in a cheaper way. If we have to wait more than a week, money can be saved by avoiding translators have to work overnight.

But why the panic in any case? There’s no real need to save the money; the budget’s in good shape for next year.

Perhaps the likely reason is  that the presiding officer is keen to ensure the Assembly is in tip-top shape financially for the coming referendum on additional powers. The fear is not so much attacks from the Welsh Tories, but from the Taxpayers’ Alliance, closet friends of right-wing Tories in England.

Both political leaders refrained from criticising the presiding officer by name. It was however suggested to them that they perhaps feared his reaction in terms of calling them to speak during sessions.

Eventually, a Lib Dem official blurted out the Elis-Thomas name; by then, Kirsty was no longer in the room.

Let it not be thought that this piece is an attack on Lord Elis-Thomas. He is emphatically not the best PO that the Assembly has got (meaning better ones exist were they to have tried for the job).

He is far more than that, he is the best PO possible. His deputy Rosemary Butler (Newport West, Labour) would be a disaster – she is an extremely good democrat, very keen to ensure that members make their point (albeit within the time limits laid down).

But Lord E-T is more; he is the only individual in the Assembly who can think the unthinkable about the future (ie full independent status) and ensure that decisions made in the interim would not end up as difficult blockages along the pathway.

UPDATE:  I see that the commission has partly backed down, and agreed to provide translations into Welsh after only five days.  The statement says nothing, however, on how long it will e fore the primary Record of Proceedings (using just the language used) will take to appear.

Even the current 24 hours is too long. How few hours does Hansart take ?

Share
 

IT CAN be advisable not to cross Kirsty Williams, the Lib Dems’ leader. She can be quite sharp in her corrections, writes Clive Betts from the Assembly press gallery.

It would have been nice as a reporter to be around when she confronted Nick Clegg, her UK party leader and Vince Cable, the treasury spokesman, over the latter’s proposal to ditch the massive military facility planned for St Athan.

Mr Cable had put forward the plan – which would put an end to a £13bn proposal and 5,000 jobs – without consulting the Welsh party at all.

Senior figures in the Welsh party were – to put it mildly – rather surprised at the proposal.

Ms Williams let it be known yesterday that words had been had at the most senior level with the culprits about what they had said. “And we obtained apologies,” she added.

Ms Williams then listed a long series of committees on which a Welsh member would in future sit so that both countries know what is happening. But some of the committees named seem so obvious that one wonder why the link has not existed for years …

And what is the policy about the proposed military development of St Athan ?  “It remains in both the Welsh and UK policies,” said Ms Williams.

All the same, now that the Lib Dems have listed the project for possible axing, how long will it be before the other parties steal yet another Lib Dem policy ?

Share
 

IN THE dying days of the system, is there much point in discussing whether or not it is being correctly operated ?

But that was what Kirsty Williams tried over how to present Legislative Competence Orders  (LCO) to the Houses of Parliament, writes Clive Betts from the National Assembly press gallery.

Two LCOs have run into considerable troubles, almost amounting to their rejection. Both housing and the Welsh language will have to be rewritten.

Why ?

Ms Williams has read deeply into the hearings of the Commons Welsh Affairs Select Committee, and come to the conclusion that the LCOs’ title pages – which lay out what the LCO aims to do – have been too narrowly written.

The result has been that MPs have argued in London that the terms of the LCO as sent down from Cardiff are being exceeded.

Ms Williams’s argument is almost that of her predecessor as Lib Dem leader, Mike German.

Mr German always took a maximalist view of the Government of Wales Act 2006.  He believed that MPs would treat the Assembly as a grown-up body, and act accordingly. London would, he argued, be willing to transfer blocks of legislative power to Cardiff.

But Mr German reckoned without former First Secretary Alun Michael, who took a legalistic and minimalistic view of how power should transfer from London. He also reckoned without David Jones, Tory MP for Clwyd West, an anti-devolutionist who uses his legal skills to develop convolutions apparently aimed to assist devolution, but really aimed to sink them.

Ms Williams takes a benign view of the attitude of  MP dinosaurs in London.

It has been argued that in their near-rejection of the Welsh language LCO is for reasons so varied that there is no way in which their complaints can be answered.

Too many London MPs want to kill the Assembly. They will use many ways in achieve that aim.

In such a situation, there is no point in writing an LCO’s aims in a wider form. London really wants to kill LCOs because the mother of parliaments is so perfect.

The only answer is a federal-style solution for Wales. If that leads eventually to a 26-county situation, presumably David Jones will stand up and take the credit.

Except that the Welsh equivalent of the English Tory refusal to give home rule will be Wales taking the part of the 26 counties, while England plays the part of Ulster.

Share
 

I WONDER whether the new Lib Dem leader Kirsty Williams can ever win over the issue of payments to Assembly Government contractors, writes Clive Betts from the National Assembly press gallery.

She complained to the press at the weekly Lib Dem briefing that while suppliers of goods – such as paper and pencils –  to the Welsh government get their bills paid very rapidly, contractors who supply training services – particularly to the newly-unemployed – have to wait at least two months.

“This has left a very bad taste in the mouth,” she said. “The very companies working to tackle the impact of the recession are in danger of going to the wall because Labour and Plaid are mismanaging the departments responsible.”

The answer to the problem seems to be the problem of ensuring that training has been delivered. Close checks have to be made.

There have already been a couple of scandals within Wales of training services being billed for, while they have not been provided.

Sad to say, it seems training is a service open to fiddles.

Also sad to say, the Lib Dem’s new leader doesn’t seem to making sufficient impact at these weekly briefings, in comparison with what the other party leaders manage.

Share
 

QUITE A little battle is opening up between new Lib Dem leader Kirsty Williams and certain parts of the Assembly Government, writes Clive Betts from the National Assembly press gallery.

The Lib Dems released a press statement at their weekly press briefing on the number of  laptops and other electronic equipment which the Assembly government and its officials have lost or had stolen.

The worst department, apparently, is economy and transport, headed by deputy First Minister Ieuan Wyn Jones.

Ms Williams went close to blaming Mr Jones himself for the 13 laptops and two Blackberries (a superior form of mobile phone) which have vanished. Was this because of  the sort of leadership his department was providing ?

One almost expected Ms Williams to say that, clearly, nationalist leadership could not be trusted; perhaps they were secretly exporting them to independent Dublin.

Ms Williams certainly used one very good point … in that it is proving extremely difficult to obtain information about missing property from the government. Or of most other sorts of information. The open government we were promised from our National Assembly is certainly far from what we are in fact being provided at the moment – except perhaps in openness to theft and loss.

But beyond that openness problem – which deserves greater dissection, at a later date -  lies a personality clash which seems to be developing. The previous week, Ms Williams had claimed Mr Jones’s economic department had been making a bad job of dealing with one of her constituent’s business problems during the present economic downturn.

This had led to Mr Jones leaping to his feet during an Assembly session, waving a sheet of papers at the Lib Dem leader, and alleging that all the information she had claimed was not available was in fact easily to hand, if only she had asked him.

Yet, a week later, Ms Williams demanded to know why she had still not had sight of the information that Mr Jones waved around. Her constituent made the same complaint. He still had not received the information that Mr Jones said was available to him.

A strange issue.

It almost seems to link with the complaint made by an Assembly committee that Mr Jones was refusing to supply them with information on transport priorities which they thought they had a right to. Some (Labour) members of the committee even threatened to take Mr Jones to court.

The Cardiff Assembly was supposed to be an excellent example of openness of information. Or, it was when Ron Davies, Caerffili AM, father of devolution, and former Welsh Secretary, still roamed the corridors.

It’s been a sadder and weaker institution since he left.

Share
 

The Lib DemsFor the Liberal Democrats, the European votes looked a disaster, and one must wonder whether the party has much future in Wales, writes Clive Betts from the National Assembly press gallery.

Before the poll, the party was confident about winning the fourth seat; in the event, the Lib Dems came 14,000 votes short, and it went to UKIP.

And worse than that, in the Westminster constituency returns [available from the Pembrokeshire County Council website] the party usually came fifth.

In only six seats was a decent vote scored – in Cardiff Central, where the party came first;  the party was second in  Ceredigion, Brecon and Radnor, Swansea West and Newport East; while it managed third place in Montgomery.

One of the first questions from the press was whether it was time to ditch Lembit Opik in Montgomery before he got ditched by the electors.

In both Powys seats, the sitting Lib Dems were resoundingly passed by the Tories.

Kirsty Williams, the party leader and sitting AM for Brecon, was taking the briefing. Her argument was simple – her party consistently under-polls at European elections in Powys.

She refrained from saying why that might be. But it is simply because the large hill farming electorates of those two areas are strongly anti-European – that might seem strange as it is farming subsidies from Europe which help keep those farmers in business. But that it is how it is.

The Lib Dems are probably the party which is best at comparing the different results that can be produced by elections for Brussels, Cardiff and London.

Montgomery is the obvious problem constituency. The party clearly believes Lembit Opik, the MP, is at risk over his antics (with both cheeky girls and with asteroids). “He is the right candidate,” Ms Williams proclaimed. Which is rather different from  expecting him to win.

She then added, “The Welsh party will be doing everything they can to get him elected.” This presumably means drafting in workers from the plenty of constituencies in Wales and in border counties of England where a win cannot be expected.

When similar doubts were declared by the press about Ceredigion – where Plaid scored almost twice as many votes as the Lib Dems in the Euro-poll – Ms Williams put on her lively-lady act. Whatever figures the press could produce, Ms Williams had others. And those figures were far more convincing. At least, they convinced her.

Compared with the Euro-election five years ago, Lib Dem support in Ceredigion had risen substantially, we were told.

Afterwards, Peter Black, the regional AM for South West, weighed in. He forecast that Mark Williams, the MP who unexpectedly snatched the seat from Plaid at the last London election, would go back with a greatly-enhanced majority.

This line strongly contrasts with what Plaid says – in particular Elin Jones, the AM. But the Lib Dems refuse to give way. They talk of the strong support on the doorstep that was during the Euro-election willingly given to Mr Williams.

Really, there is only one constituency where the party polled well – Cardiff Central, where the sitting AM strongly challenged Ms Williams to succeed Mike German. But youth won out over age and experience.

Ms Williams fought her leadership election on the need to “change the way in which we organise the party”. Yet the only person who clearly had organised her party successfully was Mrs Randerson.

But the Lib Dems possess two very different base-roots in Wales. There is the rural base – and that is where Ms Williams admitted she had been temped to pay the candidacy fee for her cash-strapped would-be UKIP candidate in Brecon. That was because he would be sure to take votes from the feared Tory challenger.

The second base is the urban one represented by Mrs Randerson. That base is achieved through the archetypical Focus newsletters delivered each month to every elector, focussing on local problems, and, of course, the possible Lib Dem answer.

In Cardiff, Focus eventually won the city council. The same is on its way both in Swansea (with Mr Black the leader) and, more slowly, in Newport.

Ms Williams declared she was “very buoyed up” by the Welsh results. The party had out-performed the parties in both England and Scotland (as the Welsh votes increase was by only 0.2 per cent, rising to 10.7 per cent, compared with 21.2 per cent for the Tories, the Welsh leaders), she really didn’t have much to boast about.

Ms Williams said she was “disappointed” not to have won the party’s first seat.

In the way that things are going, perhaps she should be more concerned about the possibility of losing the party’s last seat – which will probably be in Cardiff Central.  Although, on current showing, Ms Williams would have had to become old and experienced.

Share
 

I’M SURE Cambria - and its political editor – will get the blame for this report.

But all I’m doing in penning this attack on Ieuan Wyn Jones, Plaid group leader and deputy first minister, is repeating the words from the Liberal Democrat briefing this morning.

Kirsty Williams, the Lib Dem group leader, asked whether Mr Jones was capable of continuing to hold his alternative job as minister for the economy.

The reason she gave was not political. It was because she said he could not manage his workload.

She took her evidence from a freedom of information answer – the percentage of his letters which he answered within the official target of 17 working days. His figure was only 72 pc, compared with figures of over 90 per cent for other ministers with relatively-allied responsibilities.

Ms Williams, AM for Brecon and Radnor, said, “The head of the department that is responsible for the well-being of our economy doesn’t seem to be responding to the economic downturn in Wales.

“If Welsh businesses treated their customers this poorly, they wouldn’t last long. The First Minster’s mantra of agile government for fragile times should be more like agile government in fragile times.”

Ms Williams then goes on to claim that “some Labour AMs even question whether he is capable of holding both economy and transport portfolios while being Deputy First Minister”.

It isn’t, of course, Mr Jones who pens the actual answers to the public; he merely signs on a dotted line put before him by his civil servants. But it is he who agrees the line to be taken. Ms Williams wonders whether he is taking far too long in deciding what the lines should be.

Shades, indeed, of Alun Michael when he was First Secretary in the months after the Assembly first opened 10 years ago. The jokes that went around then about Mr Michael taking care to pile neatly the paper-clips undoubtably played some small role in his early departure and replacement by Rhodri Morgan.

Share

Cambria Books

New publication.
Important contribution to our knowledge of the Arab Spring by Denis Campbell.

Cambria Books

New publication. Entertaining guide to the US Elections by Denis Campbell.
© 2011 CAMBRIA POLITICO Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha