Who are we thinking of? You know who you are.

cic gosb!

Who is Look Luke Holland?

‘The unsmiling svengali behind Screwloose’s campaign….’.  ‘Is Luke the Rasputin to Huw and Anne’s Nicholas and Alexandra….?’ ‘Is he Dutch…or is he Georgian? – just who is this enigmatic Machiavelli whose very name strikes dread into the hearts of erm……his own Party!?…..this media magus, this augurer of the airwaves, this thaumaturge, seer and sorcerer who is leading his idol so deftly and so brilliantly to almost certain disaster victory in Labour’s  leadership armageddon?????????????’

Is he (gulp) a manifestation of Jonah’s Curse?

Share
 

This interesting video from Guido Fawkes blog sums up how NuLiebour appear to be twisting historical facts in their party political broadcasts. It gets worse and worse!

Share
 

The redacted version of the Huw Lewis blog post instead of the one the Labour Party bully-boys don’t want you to see. We’re confident that the full version will be back on line for your delectation (and their confusion) soon!

xxxxxxx xxxxx the xxxxxx

By Axxxxx Llxxxx Pxxxx

xxx xxxx it all appeared to be going swimmingly well for xxxxxx, xxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx Labour leadership candidate Huw ‘xxxxxxxxxx’ Lewis – xxxxxx xxx xxxxxxxxxx.

Over the last few weeks in the gripping battle to succeed Rhodri Morgan as First minister of Wales, it appeared that rank outsider xxxxxxxxxx, xxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xx xxx xxxxxxx xxxx Harry Ramsden xx x xxxxxx xxxxxx, might yet slip under the radar and bring the contest to a tight finish.

Obvious favourite Carwyn Jones, a xxxxxxx xxxxxxx and xxxxx xxxx xxxxxx with xxxxxx gravitas to lead a political party, xxxxxx out on the burning issue facing Wales: increased powers for the Assembly – apparently xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxx. Meanwhile xxxxxx xxxxxx Edwina Hart’s campaign ran xxxxxx xxxxxx with xxxxxx the future of xxxxxx.

No mention of anything remotely xxxxxx, xxxxxx xxxxxx or xxxxxx

Suddenly xxxxxx seemed to be a contender. The former chemistry teacher’s 5-minute interview on Thursday’s AM/PM programme actually gave the impression of a reasonable, softly-spoken family man and with no mention of anything xxxxxx, xxxxxx xxxxxx or xxxxxx -as might have been expected. When considered against the xxxxxx of Edwina and Carwyn on the same programme, xxxxxx his chances. xxxxxx then came yesterday’s headline…

xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx BEHIND HUW LEWIS’ VISION FOR WALES!

and the dream is all xxxxxx.

Political xxxxxx

The very idea of this xxxxxx duo of political xxxxxx and xxxxxx xxxxxx (Kinnock as Labour leader, Glenys as a xxxxxx ‘xxxxxx’ MEP xxxxxx xxxxxx Foreign Office minister) giving a boost to anyone in this contest is as xxxxxx as it is xxxxxx. Here is a couple whose xxxxxx  Wales, its people, language, culture and history (xxxxxx is on record as saying that xxxxxx) is matched only by an xxxxxx (see Cambriapolitico passim). Lewis xxxxxx that he was “honoured and humbled to have the backing of two such great party figures”, adding xxxxxx that xxxxxx was somehow responsible for having “saved the party from electoral extinction”, xxxxxx opposite xxxxxx case. He famously xxxxxx election xxxxxx it to years in the xxxxxx until Tony Blair recreated it along Tory lines in the lead up to the New Labour victory of 1997.

Champagne- xxxxxx

xxxxxx avowed socialist AM for Merthyr Tydfil – who lives with his AM wife in xxxxxx Penarth (xxxxxx his “passion is to rid Wales of the xxxxxx of child poverty”) – being endorsed by a duo of champagne- xxxxxx and political xxxxxx, is one step xxxxxx.

xxxxxx the Labour Party in Wales has the sense to see straight xxxxxx.

The Stasi are waiting in the wings!!

Share
 

A warning from history.

In an attempt to gag Cambria Politico, one of the fiercest critics of the Labour Party in Wales, agents for Labour leadership contender Huw Lewis launched a barrage of intimidatory threats resulting from an article on this blog which hit their boss a little too hard for comfort. With precious little investigative political journalism in Wales as it is, and the consequent yawning democratic deficit, Labour’s thugs are determined to hound journalists who criticise their bosses even in a quite obviously satirical and tongue-in-cheek way.

Such naked intimidation on the part of the Huw Lewis camp does his campaign no credit whatsoever. If this is a foretaste of what we might expect from a Labour administration led by Lewis it bodes very ill for Welsh democracy indeed. But this is Labour showing its true colours and they are ugly ones. Be warned.

For the record, here is the full text of an email (sent erroneously to the editor of Cambria Magazine) from one of Lewis’s henchmen and forwarded to Cambria Politico:

Dear Editor

Further to my phone message this afternoon and my conversation with Clive Betts, I’m writing to inform you that I am making a formal complaint to the Press Complaints Commission regarding defamation in the above piece and in regards to how the article relates to the following sections of the PCC Code.

1. (i) The Press must take care not to publish inaccurate, misleading or distorted information, including pictures.

4. (i) Journalists must not engage in intimidation, harassment or persistent pursuit.

12. Discrimination (i) The press must avoid prejudicial or pejorative reference to an individual’s race, colour, religion, gender, sexual orientation or to any physical or mental illness or disability.

Leaving the entirely puerile tone to one side, there is a clear implication running through the piece that Labour AM, Huw Lewis, suffers from a mental health problem. This is an extraordinarily serious allegation made in a totally unacceptable and staggeringly crass fashion.

I would like to know what your publication guidelines are for Cambria Magazine and the accompanying blog, which is registered to the magazine.

Where does editorial control lie?

I am also reporting this matter to Claire Clancy, the Head of the Assembly Commission in order that she may review ongoing concerns in relation to the conduct of Cambria Magazine in relation to Members of the National Assembly for Wales, with particular regard to article 4 of the PCC code.

I am also asking for legal advice in relation to taking the matter forward relating to the specific blog post.

For your information, Clive Betts today denied to me directly that he wrote this piece and is therefore not responsible for its content. I have to accept his word on that matter.

Mr Betts also denied knowing who did write the piece and who was responsible for the publication of the blog. A statement which I believe to be untrue. I look forward to your clarification on who the blog author is.

Whilst these matters are being taken forward, I would like this blog post removed immediately.

Yours sincerely,

Matt Greenough

Office of Huw Lewis AM & Lynne Neagle AM

matt.greenough@wales.gov.uk

Tel: 029 2089 8752

Fax: 029 2089 8387

National Assembly for Wales

Cardiff Bay CF99 1NA

While Cambria Politico takes legal advice on this issue the post has been ‘unpublished’. Watch this space.

Cambria Politico will not be silenced but will continue to speak for, and fight for, the people of Wales and continue to expose cant, humbug, corruption, bullying and intimidation wherever it is found.

Share
 

Huw LewisJust when it all appeared to be going swimmingly well for ultra-left, ultra-unionist devo-sceptic Labour leadership candidate Huw ‘Screwloose’ Lewis – suddenly it’s all gone pear-shaped.

Over the last few weeks in the gripping battle to succeed Rhodri Morgan as First minister of Wales, it appeared that rank outsider Screwloose, despite having more chips on his shoulders than Harry Ramsdens on a Saturday night, might yet slip under the radar and bring the contest to a tight finish.

Obvious favourite Carwyn Jones, a patriotic Welshman and the only contender with enough gravitas to lead a political party, wimped out on the burning issue facing Wales: increased powers for the Assembly – apparently terrified of being labelled a closet nationalist. Meanwhile statuesque valkyrie Edwina Hart’s campaign ran messily into the mud with an unnecessary and unwise spat over the future of Faith Schools.

No mention of anything remotely anti-Welsh, rabidly unionist or loony-left. Suddenly Screwloose seemed to be a contender. The former chemistry teacher’s 5-minute interview on Thursday’s AM/PM programme actually gave the impression of a reasonable, softly-spoken family man and with no mention of anything remotely anti-Welsh, rabidly unionist or loony-left as might have been expected. When considered against the lacklustre efforts of Edwina and Carwyn on the same programme, you’d have fancied his chances.

But then came the headline…

KINNOCKS THROW WEIGHT BEHIND HUW LEWIS’ VISION FOR WALES!

and the dream is all but over.

Political clowns

The very idea of this Wales-hating duo of political clowns and abject failures (Kinnock as Labour leader, Glenys as a globetrotting ‘Welsh’ MEP who failed to champion one single local issue, and latterly as a disastrously bad Foreign Office minister) giving a boost to anyone in this contest is as laughable as it is pathetic. Here is a couple whose loathing of Wales, its people, language, culture and history (Kinnock is on record as saying that that Wales didn’t have any) is matched only by an obscene greed for wealth and gargantuan appetite for adulation (see Cambriapolitico passim). Lewis simpered that he was “honoured and humbled to have the backing of two such great party figures”, adding bizarrely that Kinnock was somehow responsible for having “saved the party from electoral extinction”, when the exact opposite was the case. He famously and disastrously lost Labour an election condemning it to years in the wilderness until Tony Blair recreated it along Tory lines in the lead up to the New Labour victory of 1997.

Champagne-swilling freeloaders

The very idea of the avowed socialist AM for Merthyr Tydfil – who lives with his AM wife in comfortable middle-class style in the leafy avenues of smart, upmarket Penarth (he claims his “passion is to rid Wales of the curse of child poverty”) – being endorsed by a duo of champagne-swilling multi-millionaire freeloaders and political dinosaurs, is one step too far.

Let’s hope what remains of the Labour Party in Wales has the sense to see straight through this grotesque charade.

By Cynfelyn

Editor’s Note

Wales gives notice to Liebour’s Stalinist bullies – we will not be silenced!

After due consideration by Cambriapolitico’s legal counsel, we feel that the people of Wales have the right to read, in full, our contributor Cynfelyn’s article which has induced such a hissy-fit in Huw Lewis’s highly-strung henchmen Matt Greenough and Luke Holland.

The idiotic idea that reminding readers of Huw Lewis’s nickname “Screwloose” – it’s been applied to him in political circles in Cardiff Bay for some considerable time – and, DOH!, it’s also er… a play on his name, is in anyway a comment on his mental health, should send those who thought it up scrambling onto the couch of their own therapists in Cathedral Road.

The whole silly exercise shows how running scared Liebour’s lost legions
are, and that’s what’s made them so pathetically – and babyishly – touchy.

As we have said – be warned – this is a foretaste of the sort of intimidatory regime a Huw Lewis Liebour leadership will mean.

Share
 

News that plans for the Murder Academy at St Athan are in serious jeopardy will lift the hearts of Welsh patriots. The Sunday Times reports that the whole project is threatened as the contractor Metrix, which is lead by the ‘defence group’ Qinetiq, is struggling to get the £1.3 billion from the banks needed to keep the project afloat.

A New Liebour pipe dream built on lies and half-truths.

Those of us who have been following developments over the last couple of years with mounting disgust will hope that this signals the beginning of the end for this ill-conceived and sinister knavery, largely peddled by Labour Vale of Glamorgan MP John Smith. Smith, a faceless New Liebour fellow traveller, will be defending a slim majority of just 1808 at the next general election, has high hopes that the project might just save his skin. It was Smith, you will remember, who once gushed about Barry experiencing a 21st century Welsh rerun of the Californian Gold Rush, with 5,000 new jobs, and a spanking new ‘centre of excellence’ infrastructure bringing as yet undreamed of benefits to the whole of South Wales. It is turning out to be just another New Liebour pipe dream built on lies and half-truths. And thank goodness it is.

Anyone with any sense knows that any ‘Defence Training Academy’ worth its salt would need a huge influx of highly qualified specialist personnel into the area, and that means around 4,500 of the new jobs. Such an invasion would bring with it all the unsavoury curses of a large-scale military presence with vastly increased traffic and construction, not forgetting the inevitable increase in violence and drunken behaviour and resulting local resentment. Any jobs left over for locals would be those of the order of cleaners, security personnel, ancillary labour, cooks and bottle-washers.

We’ve seen it all before. Remember the sweeteners to attract valuable inward investment by the old WDA? Remember the jobs-for-the-boys of the 1980s and 90s, the reneged deals, the red faces, the desolate, unoccupied state-of-the-art ‘facilities’?

Another idiotic splurge of public money

A recent idiotic splurge of public money, incidentally, was right there at St Athan with the much vaunted “Project Red Dragon” – an aeronautical ‘super hangar’ maintenance centre. Back in 2003, this promised us the creation of, 3,300 jobs and a lot more besides because the new facility was to open its doors to commercial aviation concerns. Ribbons were cut, red carpets laid, champagne sprayed, and First Minister Rhodri Morgan promised the inevitable ‘bright new future’ from the regulation bright new ‘centre of excellence’. Within a year the project was on the rocks with a loss of 550 already existing jobs – the result of sensible rationalisation and a more realistic bid by the RAF.

You’d have thought we’d have seen this one coming then? No, Liebour just can’t help it.

The Sunday Times article continues: “Ministers have insisted that the troubled programme to centralise the military’s specialised engineering and technical training at St Athan in South Wales is back on track and would be signed before MPs’ summer recess.”

“But officials revealed that the deal would not now be signed off before the recess, with the possibility that contractor Metrix, led by defence group Qinetiq, “could walk away”. The memo admits that the “currently planned programme will be hard to achieve” and the implementation team is “conducting fall-back planning”.

“The state has provided another £44m to keep the project going, a sum recently confirmed in a parliamentary minute. The government came under fire this year when it emerged that it had already provided “contingent liability” funding of about £50m.”

‘Fall-back planning’? Sound idea – as long as all the bills, the sweeteners, the perks and the pensions are settled first of course – all from a total that’s not far off £100 million of public money.

Afghan adventure costs Wales £127,000,000 a year

In the light of the current financial crisis, a government defence spending review is now looking seriously at Britain’s Trident programme – the true cost of which, including the purchase of new missiles, the replacement of existing nuclear submarines and the overall costs of maintaining the entire system for 30 years was, in 2006, estimated at £76 billion. It is significantly greater today.

The government is also re-examining the construction of two vast 65,000 ton super aircraft carriers, the original budget for which has risen by a quarter to £5 billion (from an original £3.9 billion). In view of the obvious and urgent need to cut public expenditure, why on earth is Britain still trying to punch so far above its weight when it patently can’t afford it? Why is Britain still sending a foreign aid package of £825 million to India, a nuclear power with its own space research programme and one of the fastest-growing economies of the world? Why is Britain pursuing a winless war in Afghanistan with troops issued with inferior equipment which is patently not fit for purpose, at an annual cost to the British taxpayer of more than £2.5 billion – that’s a cost, incidentally, to Welsh taxpayers of a staggering £127,000,000 a year. Think also of the terrible, criminal loss of life Liebour’s ill-conceived adventures in Iraq and Afghanistan have brought about, and there’s no sign of the latter ending any time soon.

No! to saving John Smith’s parliamentary career

Commenting on the latest developments Mark Pritchard, Conservative MP for The Wrekin in Shropshire, a fierce opponent of the scheme, whose own constituency has a location and facilities which provide a far more feasible and cost-effective option said: “With further delays and escalating costs, no more public money should be allocated to the programme until its viability has been fully considered.” You’ve said it!

Angharad Mair asked recently “Is this the kind of development we really need or want here in Wales?” adding that the St Athan military academy would “be the military centre for the whole of the UK, and that could bring dire consequences to Wales, as well as turning a beautiful and peaceful part of our country into what would have to be a security-obsessed nightmare. In Wales we have a long and proud tradition of peace and pacifism, and that should be enough reason to condemn this horrific development.”

Indeed, the building of Murder Academies in Wales has an ignominious history. In September 1936 a ’Bombing School’ set up to train RAF pilots in the arts of aerial bombardment was burnt down by a group of Welsh patriots, Saunders Lewis, D.J. Williams and Lewis Valentine, outraged at the desecration of one of the most beautiful parts of Gwynedd. As with St Athan, there were perfectly good alternative sites in England, one in Dorset and the other in Northumberland. Both had been rejected after protests by local historians and naturalists. Wales, then as now, was singled out for the privilege.

The answer to the Murder Academy must be NO on every count:

NO to saving John Smith’s lacklustre parliamentary career, NO to disrupting and overwhelming the communities of South Wales and the outstandingly beautiful Vale of Glamorgan, NO to squandering further taxpayers’ money, NO to swelling the coffers of unscrupulous and sinister ‘defence’ consortia – and most important of all, NO to creating a monstrous colonial leviathan which will serve to bind a steadily devolving Wales to a rapidly failing England with titanic bands of armoured steel.

Sources:

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/public_sector/article6638748.ece

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2006/sep/21/military.armstrade

Share
 

Peter HainDoes he still claim for his old mum as secretary?

The Sunday Times has uncovered that Peter Hain, despite being made Welsh secretary  is still a partner in a firm that specialises in political communications. Haywood Hain, a consultancy set up with his second-wife claimed to have a “detailed understanding of the political landscape in the UK” on its website and used Hain’s London home as the office address.

Ah, bless him. Old dogs new tricks. Call the vet.

Share
 

The Barnett Formula is dead. Long live the new Barnett Formula, writes Clive Betts from the National Assembly press gallery.

The formula is of course the method for deciding how much money is allocated by Westminster to the devolved parliaments and assemblies in the UK.

It seems the new formula which will eventually appear will be almost exactly the same as the old one. Almost the only difference will be that an appeal formula will be built in so that the “regions” can object to the way the carve up that has been decided by the Treasury in London.

The future of the formula is currently being considered by the Jerry Holtham Independent Commission on Funding and Finance for Wales, set up by the Assembly after the last election. An “independent” commission only in so far as it was founded by the Assembly Government and signed into existence by Rhodri Morgan.

This committee will, of course, not be able to rewrite the formula – that has to be agreed by all sections of UK governance – in particular, London.

But for years, the Labour Party had been deeply opposed to any re-think of the formula. Why then has the Welsh party suddenly changed its mind.

Finance minister Andrew Davies, speaking to the press, more or less admitted that he didn’t want to risk any change until he was sure that Wales would come out better – which is a fair enough way of going about politics.

So what changed his mind ?  Becoming finance minister, it seems.

He then discovered how the formula was drawn up. It was already known that large construction projects in Wales (such as the A55 Expressway through the North) are excluded from it because they would cause so much distortion.

Quite what other projects are included or excluded is totally unknown. This is, after all, hardly an open part of government. Not that much is open, anyway – after the fiasco of the publication of MPs’ expenses.

So why suddenly an urge to change ? Mr Davies told us, out of nothingness, that one of the reasons the party had changed its opposition to Barnett being opened to consideration was the lack of a proper appeal procedure to the decisions made by Treasury officials.

“They are judge and jury,” said Mr Davies.

The only procedure which currently exists is to appeal to one of the rarely-used committees which deals with coordinating relations between the countries which make up the UK.

But that committee is chaired by the Prime Minister Gordon Brown. In other words, that is the Treasury in another guise. Judge and jury again, repeated Mr Davies.

It seems that this issue of creating an appeal procedure could open the way to major change.

With the road to some kind constitutional reform (in the wake of MPs’ expenses) now open, and much talk about power moving away from self-satisfying MPs, perhaps we could find the Barnett allocations decided no more by just civil servants and the London Cabinet?

Mr Davies mentioned a suggestion which came forward some time ago from former Lib Dem leader Mike German.  This was the Australian system, where funds are distributed to individual states strictly in accordance with need.

Apparently the system is pretty open. Although it can result in quite a political battle, as each state lists how great its “needs” are.

But it would be very different from the 30-year-old British system –  which everyone seems to accept as outmoded.

Share

Cambria Books

New publication. Important contribution to our knowledge of the Arab Spring by Denis Campbell.
© 2011 CAMBRIA POLITICO Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha