IT’S A move that will please petrol-heads and some of their fast-moving Tory friends, writes Clive Betts from the National Assembly press gallery.

Ieuan Wyn Jones, the transport minister and Deputy First Minister, is bringing in new speed limits for roads which are HIGHER than for the same sort of roads in England.

Mr Jones first told us about the impending changes a short while ago.  Some of us wondered at the time where this idea originated; where, for instance, was the preliminary consultation among road-users, which might have led to the idea.

But the publication of the Assembly coalition government’s half-term report – entitled One Wales 24 (because we are talking of 24 months of governmental activity) – gave a chance to raise the issue again.

The reason for placing one’s voice into gear and ask Mr Jones a question was that some English organisations – such as, no doubt, the AA among them – are complaining that the result of changes being introduced by the Department of Transport for England could result in considerable confusion on English roads.

This will be because on any particular road speed limits could change frequently – in accordance, you understand, with the character of the road.

The question which arose in my mind was whether Mr Jones’s statement of some months ago was merely a copycat reaction to what England was doing. This thought was heightened by the apparent absence of any separate Wales-only consultation process.

Well, indeed, there were some elements of copying the English, Mr Jones admitted to Cambria during the cabinet press briefing. The department in London had apparently decided to relax the normally-strict rules on speed limits.

Which means Wales can do the same.

Of course, Scotland has rather more power, and that country is on its way to gain the power fundamentally to change speed limits.  Perhaps they could even copy the Germans and drop them entirely on motorways …

When Mr Jones spoke this week to the press on what what will happen in Wales, he focussed on pressure for lower limits around schools. Nice and liberal – except in the opinion of petrol-heads.

“There are different issues,” in Wales, Mr Jones said. But he let the cat out of the bag when he started talking about the what these “different issues” might be, where they concern main roads.

In England, he said, main roads between towns were usually dual carriageways or motorways.  He didn’t need to tell us that, in Wales, they usually aren’t.

Wales would, from now on, be able to decide on speed limits in such locations. To suit the character of the country.

In Mr Jones’s words, “A lot of Welsh roads are single carriageway, and therefore there is a different relationship, and how you take is forward … “

And what does that mean ?  Does it mean you would be able to drive faster on a Welsh road than on a equivalent road in England ?

The answer from the transport minister was unequivocal – “Yes, we will be able to.”

But Mr Jones refused to say by how much that would reduce his travelling time from his Anglesey constituency to Cardiff Bay.  Of course, usually Mr Jones travels by either train or plane, to he wouldn’t want to emulate a former Plaid candidate in Denbigh who boasted of how quickly he could easily manage his trip to Cardiff – at least half-an-hour faster than I could ever manage in a newspaper office car.

Share
 

snouts in the troughWe at Cambria Politico predicted last year that the ‘credit crunch’ would result in EU Convergence Funds being  ‘subsumed’  or diverted into  public sector coffers and never see the light of day in the real Welsh economy where it is urgently needed and where it was intended to be delivered. The following article by Wyn Pryce illustrates how this was done to Objective One funding and is being done now to Convergence Funds.

—————————————————

For many years the West Wales Business Initiative (WWBI) has expressed concerns about the economic policies of the Welsh Assembly, the size of the Public Sector in Wales and the consequent imbalance of the Welsh economy.

We have argued that the Assembly Government has channeled UK and EC resource into a rapidly growing Public Sector in Wales to the detriment of the private sector. Throughout the “so-called” good years of 1999-2007, when UK GDP rose significantly, the private business sector in Wales has declined. The opportunity to rebalance the Welsh economy was missed.

We have warned several times in submissions to Ministers and Civil Servants of the outcome of these mis-directed strategies. As scarce resources have been poured into the public sector so there was less for the private sector.

In the words of Welsh economist Ted Nevin in his Textbook of Economic Analysis, “Scarcity is the foundation of Economics”. Resources are scarce and have to be competed for. There is also the Opportunity Cost: the alternative use of resource. If you do one thing, you cannot do another. Whatever that may be. You cannot do, or have everything. Therefore, there is a choice. The Assembly has chosen to divert resource into the public sector. The majority of this into wages. 71% of the total Welsh economy is now dependent on the public sector.

Some commentators have stated that the public sector is now greater in Wales than in Russia in the 70′s or China in the 80′s. Therefore something has had to give. At the moment Wales is the “basket case” of the UK. Continue reading »

Share
 

The issues surrounding new roads and their planning just never goes away as this latest message to their AMs from objectors to  the A494 widening in Deeside indicates.

The Parliamentary Planning Bill -Proposals for Infrastructure Planning Commission

This week in our Parliament, the government will propose a new “Planning Bill”. It seeks to “fast-track” the planning approval process for infrastructure projects such as highway construction and waste treatment plants by replacing existing processes with an “Infrastructure-Planning Commission”. This legislation, if enacted will at a stroke, remove from any planning process the possibility of a public inquiry conducted by an impartial inspector.

During the government sponsored proposals to widen the A494/A55 roads, the ordinary people of Deeside were aware of your own significant calls for caution in respect of consequences and due consideration of the alternatives. It was informed sentiments like this, expressed with authority and vigour that contributed to the setting up of a formal independent inquiry. Far from recommending “tweaks” here and there, the Inquiry Inspector, concluded with a recommendation that the whole scheme be rejected. Short of planning expedients that might justify a state of martial-law in the UK, I hope you will agree that this process must be seen as a cornerstone of our democratic accountability.

This needs to be kept an eye on. More on this … HERE

Hat Tip: John Butler



Share

Cambria Books

New publication. Important contribution to our knowledge of the Arab Spring by Denis Campbell.
© 2011 CAMBRIA POLITICO Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha