Tourism minister Alun Ffred Jones had an upbeat tale to tell about holidays in Wales for this summer.

His department’s advertising campaign for the industry has gone very well this year, and targets have already been exceeded.

Some sections of the industry – such as the caravan businesses – are already reporting a very good year.

Sitting in the press briefing, you could almost hear the rain beating down outside. Which prompted Mr Jones to add, “Of course, it depends on the weather.”

When we spoke to the Tories shortly afterwards, Nick Bourne threw a glass of cold rain-water on the minister’s predictions.

He mentioned one small problem that the minister has to face. The budget allocated for this year had been cut.

He could have mentioned a second problem. The abolition of the Wales Tourist Board, with all functions handed over to civil servants, seemed an own-goal by the previous Labour-only government. The ponderousness of civil service procedures did not seem well-suited to a task which must involve quick-thinking and movement.

And, more important, it had to be asked to what extent WTB-style experts within the civil service are now leading activities, and to what extent the lead is being taken by civil service “generalists”.

Above all, Mr Jones merely gave a very short statement of what he saw as happening. No report was presented to the press; all we could do was the accept or forget about the half-dozen sentences which Mr Jones presented to us.

The wealth of facts upon which any judgement must rest was totally absent.

A ministerial report to an old-style committee would have been prepared by experts; it would have been carefully penned across probably one or more pages of A4.

In distinct contrast, we were presented with not much more than the equivalent of an oral AM’s question to a minister. If you are very lucky that oral question might amount a half-dozen sentences,.

If you want to realise the value of those questions and their answers, try and find a single journalist who nowadays bothers to listen to them.

Later, the minister did in fact in his statement to the plenary make amends about the abolition of the WTB.

In fact, he came close to reversing the previous Labour administration’s desire to obtain total control of everything in the interests of Transport House [by the way, has the place fallen down yet ?]

He talked of establishing “a stronger industry-led partnership” in the development of tourism policy and strategy. That was the view of the industry itself (ie, the private sector, as spelled out by the Wales Tourism Alliance),

Hardly a “socialist” policy as would have been written by First Minister Morgan prior to the last election.  But what or who turned Morgan and his tribe into a wild group of control maniacs ?

Were they merely determined to be Left of London ?  Or perhaps some leading figures on the private side of the old WTB were too determined to be Thatcherites, despite their darling hero’s decapitation ?

Or perhaps it was the failure of the WTB’s then-chairman to tell London that Cardiff were determined to introduce compulsory registration of hotel properties – which meant that the chance of specifically Welsh legislation as part of a UK Bill had to be unceremoniously abandoned by the side of the road ?

Interestingly Minister Jones has quietly swung his party rightwards, to win the backing  of the thinking middle-class in Wales, rather than to ape some of the latest half-baked thoughts from the “socialist” part of his party.

While some of Plaid’s “socialists” think a lot (often, of sense, too), that group also makes a lot of noise.  And that noise seems designed to appeal to the weenie handful of Welsh-oriented lefties who read the Grauniad.

In other words, the voices seemed designed to receive the plaudits of the English rather than the votes of the Welsh. Which is not a good way to advance electorally.



Share
 

To some, Tory AM Darren Millar is assuredly a right-winger – mainly because of his links to Christian groups. You know, a sort of Welsh version of an an American Christian republican.

Leaving that point entirely aside, what about the views of the North member on  devolution ?

His linking with Preseli AM Paul Davies in the row over a replacement chairman to South East AM William Graham for the Tory Assembly group, however, put a different light on such thoughts.

Mr Davies is definitely One Nation – a Tory grouping which still encompasses some members of the party despite the demise of Edward Heath.

Indeed, Mr Millar has been described by a trusted informant as a “federalist ” – something akin to David Melding, the South Central AM and party policy director, as well as bete noire to right-wingers.

Asked about his “federalism”, Mr Millar yesterday demurred.  But he agreed that he “did not like” the devolved assemblies within the UK all working to different rules – Scotland has the greatest powers, followed by Stormont, with Wales some way behind, followed by London (which isn’t a country, in any case).

Really, Mr Millar’s stance probably cannot be differentiated from federalism – but that is one of the words that a rising Tory can never associate himself with.

The Northern member points out, additionally, that devolution should not halt at Cardiff Bay. He claims – and there is evidence to back up his argument – that Cardiff is indeed more centralist than London.

Mr Millar points to the “guidance” that is sent by the respective governments to local authorities. Cardiff is significantly more prescriptive and demanding than is Whitehall, he says. Planning, he points to, as a clear argument.

It is all a reflection of the Labour pressure to force conformity, and to ensure there is only one centre of leadership, and that from floor five in Ty Hywel.

One obvious example is the way the Wales Tourist Board has been totally subsumed within the Assembly’s civil service. And the other is the way health minister Edwina Hart is gathering every iota of power to herself.

As Tory health spokesman Jonathan Morgan remarked at the Tories’ North policy forum conference in Llandudno, Mrs Hart had embarked on a “very dangerous exercise”.

She had “gone from one extreme to the other – from 22 Local Health Boards to one state-controlled governing body, bordering on old-Soviet style command and control”.

Share
 

Visit Wales (formerly the Wales Tourist Board) has already scored a number of silly own goals with the fiasco surrounding its website failure (exposed on this site) being but the latest.

Even before that particular blunder was exposed, another gaffe has been waiting in the wings for cambriapolitico to swoop upon. VeeWee had, as long ago as 2006 engaged the services of an advertising sales company, based … not in Cardiff, Caerffilli, nor Cwmbran, no, not even in Caernarfon, Caerfyrddin, Caergwrle or Cerrigydrudion…but from across the Severn Sea in… BRISTOL. Uh!?

Remember the Cardiff Civil Service mantra: “An expert is someone from at least a hundred miles away”, and “of course, they do it so much better over there, don’t they? Darling.”

Can you imagine the Scots, Irish or even the French doing the same as our own benighted brethren? Well, can you? No of course not. Not only is Visit Wales keen to visit its bounteous goodness on non-Welsh companies whenever possible (actually that’s your and my bounty, dear reader) but it has chosen a right turkey in its latest ‘external consultant/partner’.


Continue reading »

Share
 

VisitWales.com, the ‘official’ online showpiece for Welsh Tourism, is officially a failure. The parrot is dead. That was the message and admission loud and clear from a consultative meeting of Visit Wales officials and the Tourism industry held in Brecon on Tuesday.

Visit Wales, the website, has been an expensive (£2million+) disaster from its inception. The trade hates it for its unfathomable and needless complexity,  the incomprehensible terminology used (a bed and breakfast is known as a ‘tourism product’!),  and apparent lack of benefit in terms of more tourism business generated (see Dylan Jones-Evans for the recent shameful statistics that tourism to Wales appears to have  grown inversely to the amount of money spent by the WAG on marketing it). On every measurable and unmeasurable level, this so-called destination management system (DMS) has been a failure, now publicly acknowledged, and yet … nobody is going to be held to account. Why not? Continue reading »

Share

Cambria Books

New publication.
Important contribution to our knowledge of the Arab Spring by Denis Campbell.

Cambria Books

New publication. Entertaining guide to the US Elections by Denis Campbell.
© 2011 CAMBRIA POLITICO Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha