A SUGGESTION BY  a senior Conservative that the supermarkets should be broken up created some excitement at the briefings when the Assembly resumed after the half-term break, reports Clive Betts from the Press Gallery.

Admittedly,  it was only a suggestion from one of those think-tanks which had, no doubt, been told to engage in some blue-sky thinking.

But Tory leader Nick Bourne, sitting for Mid and West – where a host of small towns could easily be adversely affected – seemed in no hurry to reject the idea.

Although he poured cold water on the break-up suggestion, he quickly followed by emphasising the problems supermarkets could bring. Although Mr Bourne did drop in a mention of the advantages …

”We do need to mention the dangers of supermarkets. But they do have their good sides.,” he said.

Mr Bourne emphasized that the problem is very much international.

But he failed to come up with the point I noticed in a book review a couple of days ago. One country which has dealt with the problem much better than Britain is Germany.

Presumably, in that country, Aldi and Lidl have not gained the massive power which currently accrues to Tesco in Britain.

You can be sure that in the massively-overcentralised state that is Britain, the closest and most-powerful of links exist between individuals on the main board of Tesco and politicians at the top of both the Labour and Tory parties.

It was because of such links that the comments by Mr Bourne were so surprising.  But then the Welsh Tories are almost left-of-centre.

Kirsty Williams, when told of Mr Bourne’s comments, commented that she was glad that the Tories were catching up with a Lib Dem policy that was eight years old.

As a farmer’s wife living in rural Brecon , she quickly listed the host of problems with Tesco and their ilk cause. The basic one is that they are so big, and many of their suppliers are small.

Lack of equity between the two sides was a major problem. The little men were unable or afraid to complain about their treatment because of fear of losing contracts.

A supermarkets ombudsman would be a first step in reform. And what about breaking up – “An ombudsman is the first step,” she said.

Share
 

WE ALL wondered why the entire Tory group turned up for that group’s weekly press briefing – plus Cheryl Gillan, the shadow secretary of state, writes Clive Betts from the Assembly press gallery.

Then someone else walked in, and Plaid AM Oscar – formally known as Mohammed Asghar – became their 13th member.

Unlucky 13 ?  No, I was told by one of the original 12, it’s a lucky 13.

Oscar had done his flit only half-an-hour before he was due to attend the Plaid group’s weekly group meeting just down the corridor.

We asked him what Ieuan Wyn Jones, the Plaid leader, had said. “Haven’t told him yet,” was the reply.

Oscar was a bit vague about precisely why he had decided to depart that party. Lib Dem leader Kirsty Williams in her briefing which followed directed us to some of Oscar’s recent contributions to plenary debates: he had been effusive in praise for the work being done  by Plaid ministers.

But perhaps that was only a cover-up for the action he was then contemplating.

For how long he had been was unclear. Certainly the talks with the Tories had been cloak-and-dagger with only a small group within that party, and did not seem to have continued for long.

One had the feeling that Oscar’s background – he is a chartered accountant dealing with small businesses, lived in a nice house in Newport, and had a strong background in the Pakistan Air Force – would have placed him out of sympathy with some of the more left-wing elements within the Plaid group.

But he steadfastly refused to be drawn on such matters.

The biggest surprise was that he had ever been chosen as Plaid’s second nominee for South East, for he is clearly out of sympathy with any idea of “independence”. He said he a strong believer in the United Kingdom (!), and seemingly in the Royal Family.

Elected under false pretences ? No, he had never used the word “independence” in his election literature. But then does presiding officer Lord Elis-Thomas in Dwyfor Meirionnydd ?

To Oscar the critical political issue is the need for a Parliament, and that is the word that he used for the elections.

Why stand for Plaid ? Oscar had told me several years ago that a vital reason was the approach made to him by now-deputy minister Jocelyn Davies – who stands perhaps on the right (or perhaps centre, certainly not hard-left) of Plaid.

Previously, indeed, Oscar had been a Labour Party member in Newport.  Why switch from that party ? Well, Newport Labour contains some racist elements, and Oscar clashed with them at one time. Yesterday he did not remind us this week of that part of his history.

Met along the Assembly corridors, it was Andrew Davies, the Labour minister, who filled in that gap.

During the Tory press briefing, it turned out that some years ago, Oscar had approached the Tories to join that party “but I heard no more”.

I asked him whether he suspected racism among the Tories at that time for the lack of a reply, and whether he believed that the Tory Party had really changed its spots ?

The first part of the question he avoided answering, saying it had happened many years ago. The second was answered by Nick Bourne, and what do you expect his answer was?

It was very clear during the briefing that Oscar’s economic beliefs link up very clearly with Tory beliefs as advertised by party UK leader David Cameron and by Mr Bourne – who is, of course, very strong on the need for a parliament (although he avoids use of that word).

The departure from Plaid was treated as a home-coming.

His political interests, as listed in Dod’s National Assembly for Wales Companion, fit in neatly with the new-style Tory Party – economic development and social exclusion – rather than that of the Thatcherites.

But it could yet be a home-coming which causes a few problems for the Tories – if they win the next London election.  For Oscar won a seat in the Assembly as a top-up member for Plaid to compensate that party for their absence of constituency seats in the South East.

When one elected regional member drops out, the next on the list simply takes over the seat (this happened in North during the last Assembly, where Rod Richards was simply replaced by David Jones, without any new election being held).

The third-placed individual on the Plaid list was senior Caerffili councillor Colin Mann, who would have been an excellent addition to the party’s corps of AMs.

The Tories apparently checked very carefully on the Government of Wales Act that Oscar could continue with his seat, despite being part of another party’s list.

No doubt, quite an argument could be had as to whether this should be permitted. As Nick Bourne ruefully commented yesterday, it will no doubt be his own party – when,  and there’s no “if” in Mr Bourne’s mind, it wins the next Westminster election – which will have to consider whether to change the Government of Wales Act to deal with the problem.

Share
 

ARE WE seeing a new-style Tory party in the Assembly, writes Clive Betts from the Assembly press gallery ?

Nick Bourne has done much to rescue the party group in the Assembly from the right-wing days when everyone harked back to Thatcherism.

Comments, for instance, on the party’s central policy towards Europe consistently leaned towards the line that there was no need for a referendum once every country had accepted the Lisbon treaty … hardly a line which the party’s Euro-sceptics are very keen on.

The latest stage in the re-make came with the room where the party’s group of AMs held its weekly meeting.

On the outside it was broadly labelled “Equal Opportunities Committee”.

Now that was the committee from which a Tory AM was ejected because his publicised ideas were so much at variance with the committee’s aims.

David Davies, the former AM for Monmouth, was replaced by one of his more-acceptable colleagues.

But David is now confined to Westminster. And the party group is meeting in a room marked for the committee he was ejected from.

As they say, the Tory party is changing fast.

Share
 

DAVID MELDING spelled out a few Conservative principles to the weekly Conservative party briefing, writes Clive Betts from the Assembly press gallery.

Some journalists almost-presumed the briefing would not have been held because the party’s UK conference was then currently under way in Manchester.

But it was – unlike the Lib Dem do, which was ditched because they were all in conference and didn’t think that either the press or Wales was important enough to turn up for.

But the principles that Mr Melding spelled out had nothing to do with federalism or any other sort of devolutionary development which he himself personally favours.

Mr Melding spoke rather of the present system of Legislative Competence Orders (“elcos”) being both “very untidy” and a “dog’s breakfast”.

His principle for government was that the legislative process should be clear and easy to understand. The present system is however like the soup which can be found in any canal – these are not his words, but mine – with anything passing through likely to find their passage snagged by hidden underwater debris, dumped there by Labour Party anti-devolution members – again my words, not his.

Mr Melding stated the obvious – that his party is not united on devolution. He reckoned it was split in three equal parts – pro extra powers; happy with the present split between Cardiff and London; or favouring the abolition of devolution.

Then he brought into our gaze another Tory principle – that Cardiff and London should work together within the UK. He spoke of the Prime Minister coming down to Cardiff to be quizzed by the Assembly.

And the committees established by Labour – but seldom used; some of them encompassing the old Irish Free State – to link the devolved nations and London would meet regularly at First Minister level.

These committees’ inactivity is surely a not-unimportant reason why the relatively new Irish consulate in Cardiff, staffed by a full-time Irish foreign ministry official, is being abolished.

Cheryl Gillan, the shadow Secretary of State, spelled out the latest stage of thinking on that principle in her Tory conference speech. It sounded pretty good – the problem, however, is the party politics which could so soon come to dominate proceedings of meetings between Cardiff and London, instead of being just one our of many strands of that committee’s existence.

Ms Gillan said, “We are examining the mechanisms for joint working between the two institutions [Assembly and Parliament] and will be aiming for cooperation to achieve this.”

Mr Melding talked of the changes the Tories will bring in as being not much more than the formalisation of what currently happens (behind the scenes, of course, between Labour and Labour-led governments in the two cities).

Ms Gillan’s speech sounded reasonable – as you would expect from a one-nation, non-dogmatic Welsh Tory. Reading her words, it was difficult to pick out the gaps into which political opponents – of her own party in London, rather than the Nationalists in Cardiff she professed to fear – will wriggle in order to cause trouble.

But once trouble starts, particularly between two democratically-elected institutions, it would prove extraordinarily difficult to eradicate.

Mr Melding acknowledged the relationship between Cardiff and London once the party in control is each city is different would be “more difficult”.

But as a fellow non-dogmatic, one nation Welsh Tory, Mr Melding is examining things from the same point of view as Ms Gillan.

But there’s another standpoint. It is held by Ms Gillan’s assistant (or should it be “deputy”) David Jones, MP for Clwyd West.

When he spoke to Cambria at the Tory conference in Cardiff this spring, he used much the same words as Ms Gillan. But he pitched them in a different direction.

Simply, Ms Gillan wants Cardiff and London both to know what the other is planning and doing.

Mr Jones wants to know the same sort of information. But his aim is different. It is to ensure that Cardiff does the same as London. Mr Jones is an anti-devolutionist.

Wales can be different, he feels, only as long as it is not different.

I personally can hardly imagine Wales ever voting for independence.

But everyone in Ireland (the 32 counties) did not always wish to be independent, although a few did.

The events of 1916 and the execution of the leaders changed that for ever. For which you can blame contemporary Tories.

There’s no chance of any similar repetition in Wales.

Our troubles are purely constitutional, with the rare exceptions, such as those who blew themselves up on Abergele station, and John Jenkins, who is still with us (see Freedom Fighers, by John Humphries, University of Wales Press).

But the Tories should realise they are currently standing atop a slope which could easily prove to be very slippery.

It they aren’t careful, they’ll push us all down that slope. And goodness knows where we’ll end up then.

Share
 

The Welsh Tory strategy for countering Nationalists appears to be to ‘give in’ on national sovereignity and full devolution but repair Unionism by insisting on ‘ federalisation’ to the UK in a sort of United States of Britain. This is prefigured in a book by David Melding AM.

Nationalists should be aware that this could potentially be a real vote winner for the Tories and could destroy the Plaid Cymru vote in the predominantly English speaking  urban constituencies of  Wales such as the South and North East and Borders.

THE United Kingdom is in danger of disintegration and should embrace a federal structure of government and create individual parliaments in each nation, Conservative AM David Melding declares in a major book published today.

He envisages a new constitutional settlement which could cut the number of MPs at Westminster to 300 and officially recognise the sovereignty over domestic issues of the parliaments of Wales, England, Scotland and Northern Ireland.

Source: David Williams

Share
 

ARE THE Welsh Tories showing their true colours in these Euro-elections ?

The election leaflet pushed though my door contains NOT ONE word of Welsh.

Apart from a line saying that if you want to read the election manifesto in Welsh (in pamphlet form), you have got to phone a number in Cardiff (and it’s not a freephone number), presumably only during working hour.

Or you can get on your computer and send Conservative Central Office in Whitchurch an email (the purchase of the computer, and the cost of the email are both, of course, paid by yourself).

Across the front of the leaflet are emblazoned the words “Vote for Change”, and a picture of David Cameron.

Old Etonians can, of course, easily afford buying a computer to contact Central Office.

But, clearly, if you want to vote for a change of language, you will have to vote for a party which does not so insultingly condemn the Welsh language to the land of nothingness.

If you want to change the language, the message is plain, Vote for anyone but the Tories.

Now, let it not be thought I am only bashing the Tories. Admittedly the leaflet is that for South East; but the same total lack of Welsh applies to South Central. What happens in areas where more Welsh is spoken ?

What are the other parties doing ?  Plaid is not always a good exemplar; the party’s leaflets for Caerffili council are usually only in English. Even worse than the Tories, as they don’t give an option of receiving a Welsh version.

Labour, to be fair to the old crows, is totally bilingual, at least in South Central.

That still leaves the Lib Dems and the British National Party (blacks and continental barred from membership, or indeed entry to Britain.

I know, running a pamphlet bilingually costs more, or means less can be said. Labour’s dealt with the problem by using quite small type.

Share
 

Nick Bourne and the Welsh Tories seem to be storming to political advances within the next year after the collapse of the Western Mail concatenation of attacks on the propriety of the expenses he has received for being an AM and living in a flat in Cardiff during Assembly weeks.

We can expect an annual sluice of such journalistic stories each time the details of expenses paid – which almost descend to the issue numbers on receipts – are released. Normally, the not-so-hidden agenda among the public is – don’t give taxpayers’ money to politicians.

The agenda with the Western Mail, however, seems rather to serve the interests of the anti-Assembly far-right in Welsh politics.

The Mail was founded to serve the Tory Party; it then killed off the opposition which stemmed from the majority party of Wales (the Liberal-supporting South Wales Daily News); after which success it ridiculously claimed that a “paper created to serve a party now serves a nation” (Nye Bevan didn’t think so; he accordingly burned it above Ebbw Vale); and the resultant current effective monopoly (how often is the Daily Post referred to in Cardiff Bay ?) continues far too often to curry its own favourites, usually right wing Tories.

Continue reading »

Share
 

So massive is the hypocrisy and political correctness being displayed over the Alun Cairns light-hearted faux pas over “greasy Italians” that only one question remains to be asked.

And that is, when will the South West AM get his jobs back as Tory education spokesman and as chairman of the Assembly finance committee.

Well, perhaps there is a second question. How quickly before the governmentally-incompetent Italians agree to go back on their independence and invite Austria to return to run not just the north but the entire country.

Mr Cairns made his comment on a BBC radio programme, and it was truly sad to hear members of that organisation, having obtained on the show the sort of lively comment on which the entertainment industry is based, then doing their best to emphasise the seriousness of the happening.

During the week’s regular Tory briefing, they piled in with questions seemed designed to ensure the production of material to fill an extra 10 minutes or so of air time – at the expense, of course, of the person who had been good enough to fill a gap left in their original radio line-up.

At one point, party leader Nick Bourne was asked about whether Mr Cairns could be rehabilitated. Well, it’s done for serious criminals, Mr Bourne replied.

In that one short comment, the ridiculousness of the entire issue was laid bare. This was no street-corner knifing; it was a comment to the entertainment industry. And don’t tell me that the BBC isn’t on occasion involved in dumbing-down their news values.

This journalist at one point got so fed up at the over-zealous political correctness being displayed that Mr Bourne was asked when the clearly non-racist Mr Cairns would get his job back. “How long is a piece of string,” was the reply. Quite short, one felt the leader felt.

Particularly as he later felt that the BBC were trying to keep the story going for their own purposes.

Mind you, there’s another reason why Mr Cairns’s period in the doldrums is unlikely to be long. In a sign that the Beeb can also be fine journalists – I’m being nice to them, now – they took up the entire first part of the briefing by dissecting the Tory’s new education spokesman.

It turns out that the two elder children of Andrew Davies, the South Central AM, attend private school, although the others are at the local primary. Were state schools not good enough; had he no confidence in them; did he agree in giving parents vouchers for educating their children (a method of favouring the private sector); would he favour expanding the private sector ?

His replies were extremely competent. Clearly a man of ministerial calibre (very unlike two of the fading Labour characters in the present cabinet). It was a pity Mr Bourne was not there to hear this part of the briefing. But the message was plain. Mr Davies is a political liability in this particular post.

The answer to the problem is simple. Bring back Cairns quickly. And ease up on this horrendous political correctness which seems so ridiculous to everyone – except to those in the Cardiff Bay hamlet.

GIVE THIS ITEM ABLOOD BOIL – RATING
(ie. does it make your blood boil when you read this!)
[ratings]


Share

Cambria Books

New publication.
Important contribution to our knowledge of the Arab Spring by Denis Campbell.

Cambria Books

New publication. Entertaining guide to the US Elections by Denis Campbell.
© 2011 CAMBRIA POLITICO Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha